Ceedoestrees

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ceedoestrees 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Weirdly enough, despite the hype of NFTs, that's what they were being used for in the background of the bullshit.

Small artists were and still are using it to sell their work internationally, where they can tailor their own contracts that people, by default, agree to by purchasing.

They were used by people to control and verify their ownership of sensitive digital media as well.

[–] Ceedoestrees 1 points 28 minutes ago

The only counterpoint I can think of is that the distributed ledger is much harder to fuck with than a physical or digital archive with a couple backups.

[–] Ceedoestrees 1 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago)

I'm pretty blockchain neutral. I took an interest in it at one point, did some graphics work for a few companies so I learned the ropes. So yeah, I agree with the statement that OP's making a few leaps in logic.

There are a lot of corrupt as fuck companies working in blockchain because of a weird cryptobro need to reinvent the wheel of finance, but blockchain is still kinda neat. Sending funds internationally is easier, in my experience. Moving funds across borders can be a pain in the ass through a bank if you don't do it often - with crypto it's a few clicks.

This is from my old crypto knowledge before I stopped working with those folks, but there was a company in africa that launched a mesh network that spanned across multiple countries, using crypto as both the payment and the fee for spreading the signal or using it. Then there were at least a couple cases of people securing control of personal, sensitive media by tokenizing it as an NFT - which I understand was done as a faster and cheaper alternative to copyrighting internationally.

Again, I can not state enough how not a crypto bro I am, because it seems like standing in the middle of the road makes me too block-chain friendly for the internet. I've just been involved peripherally to a few things that made me go "Huh, that's actually pretty cool." It's just another technology.

[–] Ceedoestrees 2 points 1 hour ago

That's a good point, people make nodes because the incentive helps make sure there are enough servers on the network to keep it secure.

However, back in the days before blockchain we had SETI. So a case could be made that people will volunteer resources for something that mutually benefits them. Protecting ourselves from doctored media and deepfakes would be a pretty good incentive.

Then again, there are a lot of different cryptos tied to tasks already - like using phones as nodes in a mesh network, using a decentralized search engine, learning about crypto itself, etc. If blockchain turned out to be a good way to verify media, there could be a pay off for joining the distributed ledger.

[–] Ceedoestrees 3 points 17 hours ago

People can do multiple things. Like post and organize mutual aid. Or post and engage in activism. Or write a comment and think.

43
submitted 1 day ago by Ceedoestrees to c/cat
 

[–] Ceedoestrees 45 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I almost listed a few of his activism and fundraising initiatives, but then I thought: If this person doesn't think a nearly 90 year old gay man, who survived an internment camp, has seen some shit and has some wisdom to share, I probably won't be the one to open their eyes.

[–] Ceedoestrees 6 points 1 day ago

One is the venom tooth and one is the straw tooth.

[–] Ceedoestrees 0 points 1 day ago

congrats on finally reading the wikipedia page.

[–] Ceedoestrees 2 points 2 days ago

Huh both those articles confirm what I said and say the claim might be a prank. I don't know what this has to do with being wrong about where vinegar comes from.

[–] Ceedoestrees 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's behind a paywall. I'm gonna stand on the side of science and point back to what I said in my last response.

[–] Ceedoestrees 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If that is in fact a thing, it's marketing and fermentation doesn't work that way. And raises a lot of interesting question about how they manage to clear FDA guidelines. I wonder if their candida is isolated and propagated in controlled conditions? More likely it's a lie.

The yeast that colonizes humans is a different species altogether and doesn't produce alcohol, at least not in concentrations high enough to make wine. Actually would love an expert to come in on this, I learned about it long ago but have forgotten the details.

Anyway, I know enough to say they could add their natural spice to the mix, but they need wine yeast to make the alcohol which will quickly out-compete whatever strains they're shlipping in there.

553
Graph Rule (lemmy.world)
 
 
view more: next ›