T156

Myopia (shortsightedness) is a fairly big one.

The cure's been so ingrained that the anti-medicine/eugenics people don't think about their own glasses when posting.

You can just go get your eyes tested, some glasses fitted, and you're done. Repeat if it gets worse.

If you want something more permanent, you can get someone to slice open your eye, blast it a bit with a laser, and in theory, you would be completely cured, as if you never needed glasses.

Even with other forms of generative AI, there are very few notable uses for it that isn't just a gimmick/having fun with it, and not in a way achievable via other means.

Being able to add a thing to a photo is neat, but also questionably useful, when it is also doable with a few minutes of Photoshop.

I've a friend who claims it can be useful for scripts and quick data processing, but I've personally not had that experience when giving it a spin.

That was the intended audience for the comic at the time, though.

CAD was very much immature nerd humour (as was the style at the time), and it'd be inevitable that a sudden tonal whiplash to a serious tragedy around a miscarriage, out of seeming nowhere, would be received poorly.

Because chronic diseases are difficult to cure? A solid portion, like diabetes, or cancer, are a whole host of different causes in a costume.

Anything that can be easily cured/trivially managed, or outright prevented isn't considered a chronic disease any more. Beri-beri and Scurvy are non-issues today. Diabetes and AIDS aren't the death sentences they used to be.

Medical research being deliberately gatekept because a cure would be unprofitable is conspiratorial thinking, and isn't really reflective of reality.

A single dose cure for a chronic illness would be huge, and a lot of places would throw money at one if it existed, even if the cost was several orders of magnitude higher. No insurance, public health scheme, nor medical clinic would want a patient to take a constant course of medication, when they could have one, and be done. It'd be better for them, and patient quality of life. Even for the medication companies, they get to be in history books, and can get instant income, where a long term scheme might have patients dropping off for one reason or another.

Nothing would stop someone from using an AI face for it either.

Though they have made odd decisions before. IO is generic and widely-used enough that it doesn't seem implausible that they might change it to not be tied to the Indian Ocean territories.

Although unlike a naval vessel, Starfleet ships have multiple engines for different speeds. You don't want the pilot to be confused and rack the ship up to Warp cuss when you wanted full-impulse only.

It is also possible "Impulse speed" is a standardised speed in its own right, similar to how someone might say "object approaching at warp-speed, on intercept course".

'Tis a silly place.

They're allowed to join the march, just not as police.

The ban is for the police as an institution.

Right, because you would go to science class and learn economics.

It'd be like asking your economics teachers why you're not being taught English.

Even then, Trek hasn't really pushed the boundaries for a good long time. When it hit it big by TNG/TOS Syndication, it ended up being the cash cow, and thus not worth risking for such controversial things.

At most, it's just been nudging the norm, but the kind of radical shove that TOS had, and nearly got it pulled off the air twice is basically nowhere to be found.

At most, we got one or two token characters or plots, but a lot of it is mostly the norm, or just a little ahead of it.

Compare it to something less established and free to take on more risk, like the Orville. Since it doesn't have the big brand that networks want to keep reaping without sowing, it gets a lot of flexibility Trek doesn't really have any more.

I think this all happens mostly due to the stress trans people are inadvertently causing their parents. When your kid comes out of the closet, this will happen to a parent regardless of how liberal-minded they are. Even if you have no problem with the concept, your kid being trans brings about new kinds of threat scenarios you never had to think about before. If you’re a sensible, smart and handsome person like I truly fucking am, you can process it in a few years and come out as not being a 100% asshole towards the issue.

I feel like it's more the opposite problem. For the parents, trans people are a vague boogeyman. They've never meant a trans person personally, and they're constantly told that trans people are just waiting to jump them in the bathroom, or at sports, or all sorts of other things, so they've never had to contend with someone they know being trans.

If it was simply stress or threat to the kid, it wouldn't really explain the reaction to disowning them, since most of those aren't about the treatment that their kids would receive for being trans.