this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
1604 points (98.4% liked)

memes

11973 readers
1900 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre 125 points 4 days ago (2 children)

funny but make no mistake, the entire purpose of doge is to find funds to divert to rich people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The money is already diverted. That's what the tax cuts were in 2017.

This is just a way to upset various government agencies that might otherwise not be ok with law being upended to accomplish the goal of eliminating services our elected government has mandated.

The entire legislative branch is broken now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I'm not American, but it seems to me, that to get to where you currently are, the legislative branch probably needed to be already busted.

This just shines a spotlight on how busted.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 121 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Guarantee that’s not going to happen. In fact with all the savings from the other more critical services being defunded, Elon will have more money for his own projects.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago

GIMME ALL YOUR LUNCH MONEY, PUNK! DON'T YOU KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE STARVING WHO CAN'T BUY GROCERIES???

... Now to buy second dessert with this sudden windfall!

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] Botzo 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm five drinks in and this is still what jumped out.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I read the first post, spotted nothing amiss, saw this, thought it was a correction, then noticed they were both the incorrect spelling

[–] cmoney 2 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

The parasite class

[–] [email protected] 54 points 4 days ago

Hey! He EARNED that Welfare UNLIKE those SINGLE MOMS working 3 JOBS!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

Donald Trump's dad made a lot of his money off of overcharging for FHA housing. Does that count?

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Since they started, how much money in subsidies found its way directly to the American co-president anyway?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

well, the one that hit the news recently is that bullshit $400m 'armored tesla' contract for state department. the one they 'oopsed' and went back to remove tesla by name from.

[–] pivot_root 17 points 4 days ago

That whole thing sounds rather counterintuitive. Armor is supposed to protect the occupants of the vehicle, but Tesla's crown jewel of armored* trucks has a track record of spontaneous system failures that put its occupants in direct harm.

*with glass windows and steel sheet metal that can't stop a bullet.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks like that was initiated under the Biden administration?

The Tesla contract started in the Biden administration "to explore interest from private companies to produce armored electric vehicles," a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday.

Tesla was the only company to express interest in the department's request at the time.

https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/g-s1-48571/trump-administration-order-400-million-worth-of-armored-teslas

[–] nexguy 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. Musk must withdrawal his company from consideration due to conflict of interest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

He's not elected. He couldn't give a f about conflict of interest.

[–] JackFrostNCola 1 points 3 days ago

Armoured tesla...
Was the cybertruck just a soft prototype of the TeslaTank© ?

[–] Chivera 9 points 4 days ago

Co-president? Elon is the only president.

[–] cm0002 12 points 4 days ago

FYI this'll prob get removed because c/memes has a strict no political memes rule

[email protected] is a better fit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

"Why save billions, when we can save millions?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Which SpaceX subsidies are you referring to? Just the contracts they're fulfilling for NASA and the DOD?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Nice try.

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html

Musk is insane and lies when he opens his mouth. The whole operation runs on government dollars and tax breaks.

[–] Professorozone 7 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I was wondering the same thing. I wasn't aware he got subsidies. The article only pinpoints $4.9B, but it's an old article. Thanks for sharing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

@[email protected]

The article linked in the post I'm replying to, while from 2015, details $5.9 billion of subsidies that no-one I know approved in forms including tax breaks, century long $1 leasing deal in New York, rebates, and gifted sellable carbon credits.

This is separate to the $5.5 billion in SpaceTwitter contracts.

Both numbers, have, I'm sure I don't need to check any data sets to see have gone up in the 10 years since.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Looks like state subsidies, not federal?

On a smaller scale, SpaceX, Musk’s rocket company, cut a deal for about $20 million in economic development subsidies from Texas to construct a launch facility there.

Included in the local subsidies is a 15-year property tax break from the local school district worth $3.1 million to SpaceX. O

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Nice try, stan

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If that's the case, which I suspect it is, we look really fucking dumb being so hyperbolic(or what would the word be here? I just woke up). Let's not stoop to their level with nonsense like this, there are plenty of legitimate criticisms to be made.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The complete opposite is the case. Musk is lying through his teeth. The whole world sees it, just some folks still don't want to accept it.

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say in response to what I said. I'm not denying that Musk lies.
I'm saying calling money from government contracts for NASA and the likes subsidies is not correct. Unless my definition of subsidies isn't right and needs expanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd agree that unnecessary contracts are subsidies but then that just pushes your point down the road a little bit. I'd say that maintaining the ISS isn't unnecessary, for instance.

[–] Argonne 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maintaining the ISS is absolutely necessary unless you want brainrot like RFK Jr and have all your best scientists move to Chinas new space station projects. The world is a complicated place, but shunning science and space is not the answer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

That's exactly what I said.

load more comments
view more: next ›