this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
20 points (64.3% liked)

politics

20282 readers
5639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] not_that_guy05 57 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Get us an actual progressive person that is fuckin young and will fight like AOC.

Not another run of the mill BS.

[–] inclementimmigrant 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But haven't you heard? AOC is PINO now according to those in the know of the Internet.

[–] not_that_guy05 1 points 2 days ago

WTF is a pino?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

DNC: But what would the centrist Republicans think!? Centrist Republicans are the new cool thing! We're aiming for their support now! The left is out, in with the center!

Sane speak: We're looking to unlife the Democratic party! Down with us!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You can say kill and die. We’re people here not corporations.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

I was aiming more for "political suicide", but I know some people are sensitive to that word so I chose not to use it out of consideration of them not any fear of retaliation.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

She disappeared after Trump won and hasnt had a thing to say to help the democratic voter base. She needs to sit the fuck down and let someone who actually cares about the voter base and is actually going to fight for their rights run

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The only thing this poll is measuring is name recognition. She’s not even announced that she’s running. What are we doing?

[–] CarnivorousCouch 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The comments here reveal that no one actually read the first two sentences of the article. Kind of embarrassing.

[–] xenomor 30 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It seems that the only thing the Democratic Party is remotely good at, is making me want not support Democrats.

[–] inclementimmigrant 3 points 2 days ago

Yup. I haven't help the Democratic party in over a decade now outside of voting for them when the progressive I backed didn't win.

Slow but steady progress.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If you would have said that before the election, you would have been burned at the stake in this community. Attitudes have changed real quick. lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Eh you’ll still get downvotes to oblivion on Lemmy.world for pointing out that the democrats suck a massive bag of dicks. That won’t change.

[–] inclementimmigrant 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And right on that flip side you'll get downvoted and banned from .ml for pointing out that even if Democrats suck a massive bag of dongs they're still unfortunately the least of two evils.

The Internet, 'tis a silly place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have a hard time believing that you got banned from ML for saying the democrats are the lesser of two evils.

[–] inclementimmigrant 1 points 2 days ago

Believe what you will but my personal experience with the politics side of .ml, that's the case. It's not a place for open or honest discussion, not that the internet really is a place for that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Idk I've gotten some pretty good responses to this:

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Today's Democrats are the Republicans of 40 years ago. You're not wrong.

[–] kreskin 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Insulting dems is usually not downvote-worthy here. Insulting Biden is not ok with a lot of people. They still want to carve him on mount rushmore. Comparable to George Washington, I'm told. A real man of genius.

[–] AA5B 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

While I appreciate the hyperbole I think most of us are trying to say he got a raw deal. Biden was much better both in policies and what he got done m than people give him credit for … especially given what he had to work with.

A president is always going to be a mixed bag, never exactly what you want, having to compromise essentially everywhere and deal with many conflicting priorities. Yet if you look back at things actually done, Biden signed quite a bit of very positive changes

Of course that legacy is disappearing fast under someone who ignore laws, only cares about his own priorities, lets his corporate benefactors run wild, and whose entire platform is to regress to a mythical 1950s that never was. It’s going to take years, maybe decades, to rebuild a functioning government, introduce what will be legacy technologies with established foreign dominance, get most of the world to trust us again. It’ll take many years to restore human rights, and the ever more broken education system may doom red states to be nothing more than cheap outsourced labor

[–] kreskin 2 points 4 days ago

You have to balance that stuff with his support for a far right genocide and his treatment of the defund movement.

[–] kreskin 7 points 5 days ago

wooden stakes for burning people on are prohibitively expensive now.

[–] FuglyDuck 5 points 4 days ago

Still tons of people who suck off Biden’s dick as if it were a miracle cure for democracy.

Not that he was ever going to do enough to actually save it.

[–] lemmus 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What will she do differently to Newsom? “There is not a thing that comes to mind.”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

She might hire some republicans!

[–] lemmus 7 points 5 days ago

Maybe she’ll endorse Liz Chaney for Governor.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

So the dems want to lose California too? I'm beginning to wonder if they work for Trump...

[–] JeeBaiChow 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well you could probably sit it out again in protest, seeing how well that worked out last year.

[–] kreskin 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Harris and Liz Cheney reunion campaign tour. Maybe if they both shoot their glocks into the air this time she'd win.

[–] just_another_person 9 points 5 days ago

Nobody cares.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Oh my fucking god that is embarrassing

[–] AA5B 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That’s great, then Newsom can start his campaign for 2028!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago