this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1230 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

28409 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Agent641 65 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The year is 2045. My grandson runs up to me with a handful of black cords

"Poppy, you know computers, right? I need to connect my Jongo 64k display, but it has CFONG-K6 port, and my Pimble box only has a Holoweave port, have you got an adapter?"

Sadly I sift through the strange cords without a shred of recognition. Truly my time on this mortal coil is coming to a wrap

[–] Dozzi92 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Don't worry, maybe they misjudged the size of the asteroid and 2032 is it.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 6 days ago

Cool, I won't have to update my date formats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie 9 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 89 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (7 children)

I mean, it could... but if you run the math on a 4k vs an 8k monitor, you'll find that for most common monitor and tv sizes, and the distance you're sitting from them...

It basically doesn't actually make any literally perceptible difference.

Human eyes have ... the equivalent of a maximum resolution, a maximum angular resolution.

You'd have to have literally superhuman vision to be able to notice a difference in almost all space scenarios that don't involve you owning a penthouse or mansion, it really only makes sense if you literally have a TV the size of an entire wall of a studio apartment, or use it for like a Tokyo / Times Square style giant building wall advertisement, or completely replace projection theatres with gigantic active screens.

This doesn't have 8k on it, but basically, buying an 8k monitor that you use at a desk is literally completely pointless unless your face is less than a foot away from it, and it only makes sense for like a TV in a living room if said TV is ... like ... 15+ feet wide, 7+ feet tall.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Yes. This. Resolution is already high enough for everything, expect maybe wearables (i.e. VR goggles).

HDMI 2.1 can already handle 8k 10-bit color at 60Hz and 2.2 can do 240Hz.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That graph is fascinating, thank you!

[–] Katzelle3 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't think it's correct though.

The graph suggests that you should be looking at a 65-inch screen from a distance of 120 cm for resolutions above 4k to be worth it. I interpret that as the distance at which the screen-door effect becomes visible, so this seems awfully close actually.

A 65-inch screen has a width of 144 cm, which gives you a 100 degree angle of vision from the left edge to the right edge of the screen. Divide the approximate horizontal resolution of 4000 pixels by 100 and you get an angular pixel density of 40 PPD (Pixels Per Degree).

However for the pixel gaps to become too small to be seen or in other words for the screen-door effect to disappear, you need an angular pixel density of 60 PPD. That means you can sit at a more reasonable distance of 220 cm in front of a 65-inch screen for resolutions above 4k to be worth it.

This is still too close for comfort though, given that the resulting horizontal angle of vision is 66 degrees. The THX cinema standard recommends a horizontal viewing angle of 40 degrees.

So multiply 40 degrees by 60 pixels per degree to get a horizontal resolution of 2400 pixels. That means the perfect resolution for TVs is actually QHD.

[–] wolfpack86 16 points 6 days ago

There's obviously truth to there being diminishing returns, but this chart is garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Commercial digital cinema projectors aren’t even 8K. And movies look sharper then ever. Only 70mm IMAX looks better and that’s equivalent of 8K to 12K but IMAX screens (the real ones not digital LieMAX) are gigantic.

Also screen technology has advanced faster than the rest of the pipeline. Making a movie in a full 8K pipeline would be way too expensive. It’s only since recent years that studios upgraded to a complete 4K pipeline from camera to final rendered out image including every step in between. And that’s mostly because Netflix forced studios to do so.

True native non upscaled 8K content won’t be here for a long while.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

While it is pretty subtle, and colour depth and frame rate are easily way more important, I can easily tell the difference between an 8k and a 4k computer monitor from usual seating position. I mean it's definitely not enough of a difference for me to bother upgrading my 2k monitor 😂, but it's there. Maybe I have above average vision though, dunno though: I've never done an eye test.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

doesn't this suggest that my 27" monitor I sit a foot away from should just be 480p? that seems a little noticable to me

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think you got this wrong. If you sit 0.3 m away, more than 4k is worth it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

you're right lol. at first glance I thought the y axis was in inches not feet. make sense now lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 6 days ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember it? I work on PCs with DVI connected monitors every day.

[–] Raiderkev 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hell, I still use VGA for my work computer. I have the display port connected to the gaming laptop, and VGA connected to the work CPU. (My monitors are old, and I don't care)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

My monitors are old, and I don't care

Sung to the tune of Jimmy crack corn.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember? I still use it for my second monitor. My first interaction with DVI was also on that monitor, probably 10-15 years ago at this point. Going from VGA to DVI-D made everything much clearer and sharper. I keep using this setup because the monitor has a great stand and doesn't take up much space with its 4:3 aspect ratio. 1280x1024 is honestly fine for having voice chat, Spotify, or some documentation open.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (6 children)

VGA and DVI honestly were both killed off way too soon. Both will perfectly drive a 1080p 60fps display and honestly the only reason to use HDMI or Displayport with such a display is if that matches your graphics output

The biggest shame is that DVI didn't take off with its dual monitor features or USB features. Seriously there was a DVI Dual Link with USB spec so you could legitimately use a single cable with screws to prevent accidental disconnects to connect your computer to all of your office peripherals, but instead we had to wait for Thunderbolt to recreate those features but worse and more likely to drop out

[–] baropithecus 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

DVI -- sure, but if you think 1080p over VGI looks perfect you should probably get your eyes checked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Deway 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My monitor is 16 years old (1080p and that's enough for me), I can use dvi or HDMI. The HDMI input is not great when using a computer with that specific model.

So I've been using DVI for 16 years.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

I ran DVI for quite a while until my friend's BenQ was weirdly green over HDMI and no amount of monitor menu would fix it. So we traded cords and I never went back to DVI. I ran DisplayPort for a while when I got my 2080ti, but for some reason the proprietary Nvidia drivers (I think around v540) on Linux would cause weird diagonal lines across my monitor while on certain colors/windows.

However, the previous version drivers didn't do this, so I downgraded the driver on Pop!_OS which was easy because it keeps both the newest and previous drivers on hand. I distrohopped to a distro that didn't have an easy way to rollback drivers, so my friend suggested HDMI and it worked.

I do miss my HDMI to DVI though. I was weirdly attached to that cord, but it'd probably just sit in my big box of computer parts that I may need... someday. I still have my 10+ VGA cords though!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

VGA was just analog, it wasn't because the resolutions supported weren't HD.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

100% right. I know it can handle 1920x1080 @ 60hz and it can handle up to 2048x1536

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It can handle way more than that can't it? It's analogue, I remember being able to set my crt to 120hz way back in the day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've seen some videos on YouTube of people overclocking their CRTs so definitely that most be a thing. And yes it is 100% analog.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I remember my buddy getting a whole bunch of viewsonic CRTs from his dad who worked at a professional animation studio. They could do up to 2048×1536 and they looked amazing, but were heavy as fuck for lan parties lol. I loved that monitor though, when i finally 'upgraded' to an lcd screen it felt like a downgrade in alot of ways except desk real estate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stupidcasey 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

It already happened to them multiple times that's why we are on HDMI 2.2 which can go up to:

7680 × 4320 @ 60FPS

HDMI 1.0 could only reach:

1920 x 1080 @ 60FPS

The only reason it still works is because they keep changing the specifications.

And I think I can confidently say we will never need more than 8K since we are reaching the physical limits of the human eye or at the very least it will never be considered low resolution.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Maybe, but I could see thunderbolt replacing HDMI and display port over time. It can carry video, audio, data, and power simultaneously, and has more bandwidth for additional information like HDR or 3D.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But can it spy on users for marketing purposes? That's the real question.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mkuznetsoff 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

nobody noticed dark side of the moon cover on the background

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Kinda already happening with usbc

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

USB-C uses the DisplayPort protocol in many cases.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't think you'll need much more than 8k 144hz. Your eyes just can't see that much. Maybe the connector will eventually get smaller, such as USBC?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

USB-C is already a plug standard for display port over thunderbolt. Apple monitors use this to daisy chain monitors together.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

640k of RAM should be enough for anybody

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You think that's a clever analogy but it's not even close.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›