Then why are you confirming his picks?
this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
158 points (98.8% liked)
politics
19950 readers
4342 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Is Kim on the judiciary committee?
Because his donors want him to.
They're taking the bait again, FFS. This is exactly plays into the dismantling process set forth by Trump and DOGE.
Though there's a law to ensure that Fed employees get back pay to cover the time of a shutdown, what happens when it's prolonged? How long can a middle class family support not being paid in the meantime?
Which can hold out longer, the rich and mega-rich ruling class, or middle class families that are already saddled with inflation and job loss in a saturated market?
This will be the functional equivalent of starving out defenders in a castle.
The problem is that Republicans already have the votes to pass whatever budget they want: they just all have to agree. Kim is just saying that if Republicans can't agree, Democrats shouldn't help them like they have in the past.
House Democrats helped to pass CRs in the past because they also held the Presidency and the Senate, so a government shutdown would rightly be blamed on both parties. This time, though, Republicans own the whole enchilada. Why should Democrats help unless they get something tangible out of it in the budget?
Fair enough. I just hate watching this train wreck unfold in front of me.
I bet there are a lot of short term loan companies who'd love to "help" federal employees in their time of need
The same Andy Kim that voted for Noem, Duffy, Ratcliffe into cabinet positions?
Yeah, this dude isn't screaming opposition here.
The people dismantling the agencies don't work for the government so I'm not sure that will work.
Trump/Musk see that as a win/win.
They don't want government to function. Whether it's gutted or shut down makes no difference to them.
I think this is something that a lot of people don't understand, that whether the Republicans and the billionaires behind them take over everything or get to fill a power vacuum they get what they want either way, uncontested control and the freedom to loot America for its scrap.
Stop shutting down the government or else we'll... shut down the government?!?
I mean, we're all asking for some push back but this seems a bit counterproductive.
🙄 That’s exactly what he wants
It's a bit of a gambit, but Trump probably doesn't expect Democrats to pull the lever.