this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
815 points (97.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2226 readers
1867 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghost_Pepper 2 points 50 minutes ago

Protest by going out to vote. Only 64% of eligible voters participated in the 2024 election. Trump won the popular vote by a slim margin but got less votes than Biden did in 2020. Had more Democrats voted, we would have won the election.

[–] Doomsider 14 points 3 hours ago

We have always known that all broadcast and cable news media is tightly controlled. Hundreds of stations across America literally parrot word for word what each other says.

Now we also know that all social media can also be controlled. There is nowhere safe except small communities that are not controlled by corporations or the government.

They want us disorganized, poor, uneducated, and religious. This is their plan to reduce us to their serfs to be controlled and abused.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Fifty states, one message: we see through the facade. Simultaneous protests coast-to-coast, and the propaganda machines are in stealth mode. Convenient, isn’t it? A nation erupts, and the so-called “free press” opts for strategic amnesia.

This isn’t apathy—it’s suppression. When every state rises up, the system panics. The Capitol steps become battlegrounds, yet the narrative is buried under celebrity gossip and stock market fluff. They’re scared. Scared of what happens when people realize that unity in dissent is their greatest weapon.

Keep marching. If they won’t cover it, we’ll document it ourselves. The truth doesn’t need their permission to exist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Then we start picketing them, too. Right outside their media buildings, asking when they plan to grow a spine and start covering what’s happening. Add media companies to the places being protested and show what cowards they are.

[–] Theonetheycall1845 7 points 3 hours ago

Why don't we start confronting news anchors? Start calling them out specifically for being silent. This could be in person or online or both.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

they did this to “Occupy Wall Street” too… once they couldn’t ignore it anymore, they just made fun of them.
as much as i hate protests blocking the freeway, because it’s dangerous and pisses off innocent people, it does manage to get you on the news….
oh, also because it gives cops an excuse to raid you violently

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

Exactly. They ran the same playbook with Occupy Wall Street—ignore, ridicule, and then unleash the riot squads when the message hits too close to home. It’s not about “safety” or “order”; it’s about silencing dissent before it becomes unmanageable.

Blocking freeways? Sure, it’s inconvenient—but so is systemic corruption, unchecked corporate greed, and a government that treats its people like collateral damage. If a traffic jam is what it takes to make the propaganda machines blink, then so be it.

And yeah, cops love an excuse to escalate. The state’s monopoly on violence doesn’t tolerate competition, even when it’s peaceful resistance. But let them overplay their hand—every raid, every crackdown only fuels the fire they’re desperate to extinguish.

[–] GreenKnight23 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

because it was pointless.

there were 75 fucking protestors at my state capital.

how about we go protest at the federal departments in DC to stop the fucking Nazi's from getting in?

I'm talking fully armed Black Panthers level shit.

bringing guns to a protest are illegal you say? so is forcing yourself into government buildings you aren't allowed to be inside of. so is accessing government servers and cloning the data. so is shuttering these institutions that were put in place by Congress without an act of Congress.

If they don't have to follow the laws then why the fuck should we?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The time to speak up was in November. All this was obvious. People voted for it (or stayed out).

[–] GreenKnight23 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

your point?

I'm not asking for a dialogue with them.

I'm asking to push them down, arrest them, and kick their asses out of power and into a prison cell.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Would you like a unicorn, too?

Judges already decided that Trump is immune and he can pardon anyone who does his bidding. That ship has sailed.

[–] GreenKnight23 2 points 47 minutes ago

let me put it into terms you can understand.

prison cells aren't just in prisons.

if the rule of law doesn't apply to them, then the rule of power does.

why are you so defeatist? perhaps you don't want this to end and you want people to feel helpless? you think that we're trapped in here with them at the reigns?

no. no sir.

they are trapped in here with us, and we will drag them into the streets. we will string them up like Mussolini. we will celebrate their deaths.

We the people of the United States owe the world that much.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

The largest protests in the history of the world were in opposition to the invasion of Iraq. The invasion of Iraq still happened.

Protesting sends a message but it isn't enough.

[–] teamevil 3 points 3 hours ago

The media did the exact same thing too they had a bunch of Iraq war experts and nobody about why we shouldn't go to war..

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If protests aren't enough to sway a democratic system, then the democratic system is broken and resistance becomes mandatory. To quote what the german constitution established after Hitler to prevent exactly what's currently happening again in the US:

Article 20 [Constitutional principles - Right of resistance]

[...]

(4) All Germans shall have the right to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order if no other remedy is available.

I do not know if there's something akin to this in the US constitution (I know your culture very much thinks there is every time it's about guns though). But even if it isn't, fuck it. The system is evidently broken, do what's necessary to regain the power of the people. Do it the French way if you must.

[–] btaf45 4 points 4 hours ago

(4) All Germans shall have the right to resist any person seeking to abolish this constitutional order if no other remedy is available.

Wow I love this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Anyone who knows anything about history has seen this story before

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

As much as I hate riots, I mean, yeah?

[–] [email protected] 98 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The revolution will not be televised

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I finally understand what that means.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I hate finding out how my great grandparents felt in the early 1900's -- so ironic their children couldn't care less about repeating history

[–] Soup 1 points 1 hour ago

Many people’s great grandparents saw bad shit happen and then kept enabling it. Is it irony or plain ol’ stupidity?

[–] plantsmakemehappy 19 points 8 hours ago

It was on the 5th, not the 6th like in your title.

[–] PagingDoctorLove 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

After Elon's announcement about the department of Ed, I'm feeling indescribable despair. The systematic dismantling of public education in the U.S. has been happening for decades and is a huge part of the reason we're in this mess.

I know that's what they want. For us to feel paralyzed. I'm trying to fight it. But as someone who is convinced the election was tampered with*, I am sick over the fact that they let him in again. Someone should have objected before the inauguration, when an objection actually might have achieved something. I worry that the protests are not going to be enough, as they stay locked in their ivory towers. I'm terrified that a distress signal at the state department was quickly swept under the rug. I thought this is why we developed so many international alliances and treaties after WWII. To prevent fascism from taking hold in our countries. But they're not doing anything. I live in a blue state and haven't heard a peep out of my governor. Why? Are they waiting for things to get worse? Does a certain person in a specific role have to contact outside help? If so, who? We know this is going to be disastrous for more than the U.S., we can already see it happening.

I feel like I'm doing everything in my power and it's still not enough. I have friends who work for the government and they are just as scared and lost as I am. All I can think to do is be prepared for extreme hardship and try to stay involved in my community. What else is there?

*I'm just too tired to debate. If you disagree but are open to changing your mind, I have links in another comment that I encourage you to check out.

[–] FinalRemix 8 points 7 hours ago

"Our little secret" and "he's very good with computers" "like those counting computers" "landslide in PA"...
I'm rift there with you, man. He openly admitted it because he can't ever fucking help it, either.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 hours ago

Nice of the shitlibs in the comments to out themselves as not just do-nothing cowards, but active agents against dissent.

[–] [email protected] 173 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

On Feb. 15, 2003, millions of people marched in over 600 cities against the plans of U.S. President George W. Bush to invade Iraq.

First time?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But there was a massive amount of coverage on how disliked Bush was (man, in fucking comparison...) whereas op's post is about how major the protest is vs. how little coverage there is of it.

[–] glimse 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The text in the image says it's the first time, though. Don't support misinformation just because it makes us look good

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Was it all 50 states simultaneously?

[–] disguy_ovahea 41 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Many of those protests were shut down too. I was up in MA for the Blood for Oil/WMD protest. We were shut down due to a ‘bad actor’ that not one of us witnessed. Neither the bad actor nor the protest made the papers.

Props to the AP, Newsweek, and USA Today for covering 50501 while the rest show where their loyalty lies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

That was my first experience organizing a protest. Fack I am old now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Elon and the felon: "Does their protesting stop what we're doing in any way? No? Then why would I care?"

[–] OrteilGenou 9 points 10 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 49 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

By all means, protest. Push these bad actors. Stick up for democracy! But Is anyone else mildly anxious that JD Vance’s hero, Curtis Yarvin, suggested in 2022, that all Trump needs to do is declare a state of emergency to extend executive immunity to prosecution, and to do it early on? So far, project 2025 combined with the manifestos of Dark Gothic Tech Bros are aligned.

“If the institutions deny the President the Constitutional position he has legally won in the election, the voters will have to act directly. Trump will call his people into the streets—not at the end of his term, when he is most powerless; at the start, when he is most powerful. No one wants to see this nuclear option happen. Preparing for it and demonstrating the capacity to execute it will prevent it from having to happen.”

Apr. 7, 2022 Curtis Yarvin

[–] gift_of_gab 14 points 11 hours ago

But Is anyone else mildly anxious that JD Vance’s hero, Curtis Yarvin, suggested in 2022, that all Trump needs to do is declare a state of emergency to extend executive immunity to prosecution, and to do it early on? So far, project 2025 combined with the manifestos of Dark Gothic Tech Bros are aligned.

I mean, yeah.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It could be covered in social media but not by mainstream news. The real source of information these days is from the former, whether one likes it or not.

[–] NarrativeBear 33 points 14 hours ago

When you own the media...

load more comments
view more: next ›