this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
171 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18865 readers
4552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flossdaily 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The issue really isn't Trump. The issue is Trump's supporters.

It literally does not matter what Trump does or says. Truly. Their support is UNCONDITIONAL.

Trump is inarticulate. He has no policy platform. He has almost no accomplishments from his first term.

Then of course there is all the crime. He's been found in civil court to have raped a woman. He confessed to cheating a charity.

And now he stands accused of the most unAmerican crimes you can imagine: conspiracies against the US to steal classified documents, and to overthrow an election that he KNEW he lost.

Can we give Trump any credit for being a formidable candidate when literally nothing he does matters? Kill a baby? They'd just vilify the baby.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One of the few times he ever uttered the truth was when he said "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters."

[–] flossdaily 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

His covid response killed hundreds of thousands of people.

His insurrection cost multiple lives.

What he's done is way worse than shooting someone in the street.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Every covid responses in the whole world killed hundred of thousands, even in China with draconian measures.

[–] asteriskeverything 5 points 1 year ago

Some countries at least tried. Are you saying every other country took measures that caused higher death rates, infection rates, etc?

Trump was ANTI take measures. And thus more Republicans died because the cult hivemind was that none of that is helpful at best and actively harmful at worst. Even actively mocking how dorky masks look.

And please let us not forget that he suggested injecting bleach. I'm never letting this go and have to mention whenever relevant.

[–] flossdaily 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, I'm not speaking in generalities. These were the findings of a highly respected medical journal. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/10/us-coronavirus-response-donald-trump-health-policy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He would love to claim credit for the COVID vaccines. But you and I know all he did was sign off on something others put in front of him.

[–] flossdaily 13 points 1 year ago

I would give him some credit for operation Warp Speed, except for two things:

  1. The only part of the accelerated vaccine development that was actually supposed to be handled by the Trump was the distribution of vaccines. And as we know from the Biden administration, even when Trump was kicked out of office, they still didn't even have a PLAN for vaccine distributions!

  2. Trump undercut the entire vaccine effort by failing to promote the vaccine when it was done, and generally treating all of COVID-19 as a hoax. We could not achieve herd immunity because the MAGA base would not vaccine. Hundreds of thousands of deaths occurred as a direct result of Trump sending mixed messages about the vaccine, and legitimizing the notion that covid was a partisan issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don't stick your dick in crazy. Its hard to break away.

[–] xc2215x 1 points 1 year ago

Very true. Trump's supporters will defend anything he does.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At the lunch, held in late June in the White House residence, Obama promised to do all he could to help the president get reelected, according to two people familiar with the meeting, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversation.

That commitment was a welcome gesture for the White House at a time when Biden is eager to lock down promises of help from top Democrats, among whom Obama is easily the biggest star, for what is likely to be a hard-fought reelection race.

The White House said there was no specific agenda for the June 27 meeting, and people briefed on the conversation said the two presidents discussed a range of political, policy and personal matters, including updates about their families.

He also appeared in nontraditional settings aimed at connecting with young voters, such as ESPN’s Manningcast during Monday Night Football, collaborations with TikTok influencers and an interview during the NBA Finals.

As he left the White House after the lunch in June, Obama completed his first task to help Biden’s reelection campaign: filming a short video to help the president with online fundraising.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Spacebar 25 points 1 year ago

The risk is for too great to underestimate Trump's chances. Vote, encourage others to vote, and bring a first time voter to the polls with you. Don't care who they vote for, because when more people vote, the minority party loses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I don’t think they know what “private” means

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Obama never beat Donald Trump in an election, but Joe Biden has

[–] xc2215x 3 points 1 year ago

Trump has a lot of support. It will not be easy but defeating him is possible.

[–] Wookie_the_Ewok -3 points 1 year ago

Must of not been that private if it made it into the papers.