this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
440 points (98.7% liked)

Buy it for Life

4636 readers
11 users here now

A place to share practical, durable and quality made products that are made to last, with an emphasis on upcycled and sustainable products!

Guidelines:

Things that are well-made and durable (even if they won't last a lifetime) are A-Okay!

Unlike that other BIFL place, Home-made and DIY items are encouraged here, as long as some form of instruction is included in the body of the post.

Videos links are not allowed as post titles, but you may use them in a text post.

A limited amount of self-promotion is accepted, IF the item you are selling aligns with this criteria:

  1. The item must be made with sustainable or recycled materials.
  2. If electronic in some way, the item must be open-source.
  3. The item must be user-serviceable (if applicable).
  4. You cannot be a large corporation.
  5. The post must be clearly marked with a [Self Promotion] tag in your title.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themachine 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I just received mine a few days ago!

I am excited to have it and start using it but I would also caution people interested in it. It is currently a little rough around the edges software wise but I'm optimistic it will continue to improve with time.

I am personally glad I opted to support this project and while I don't think I'll be able to contribute to code I do hope to at least provide beneficial feedback and end user diagnostics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also got mine recently! Definitely agree with the rough around the edges part. This is definitely an artisanal, hand-rolled, music player. It... doesn't seem very durable. Mine rattles when I move it...

I bought it to support open source and because I'm hoping it'll last a long time. (As long as I don't move it too much.)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does anyone here remember Rockbox? I still have my old Sansa player running it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I have my iPod 5th gen running on RockBox. IMO it's even better than the stock firmware because it can play flacs.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And ogg and m4a and opus and so many more. I have an ipod 6th gen runnung rockbox. Its great. If the harddrive dies I'll replace it with sd-cards and still keep uaing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I even had Doom running on it. The controls were difficult though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rockbox is cool, I just wish it was able to replace the base system without touching the UI. Something about it just feels off on an iPod. Even supposedly iPod-accurate themes just feel uncanny.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Darmok and Jalad, at Tangara?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

shaka, when the walls fell

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

$271,285 raised of $10,000 goal. That's some pretty good odds of success

[–] solrize 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For the more adventurous, Tangara’s ESP32 firmware is written in C++ using the ESP-IDF framework. ... Tangara’s battery is a standard LiPo pouch cell with a 3-pin JST connector. ... Active battery life depends on use case (typically >20 hours)

Sorry, thanks but not thanks. Make it use a swappable 18650 and run Rockbox. Also it costs $250 which might have been ok in the early 2000s but is outlandish today. Finally it's Crowdsupply, which is not a scam but is a pain to deal with. And the battery drain is a lot too. Sandisk players were getting 10+ hours on an AAA cell in 2005 or so. This is just not an interesting product and the makers should have spent a few evenings on the Rockbox forums before starting the project.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I bought one. Unfortunately, it still doesn’t work well with large music libraries. The database building step takes several hours, with no progress indicator, and once it’s done, the scroll wheel does not accelerate, meaning that scrolling through a long list of artists/albums will take a long time. Hopefully these will be remedied in a future firmware.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Holy shit......that seems like day 0 issues. By that I mean issues to address before mass production. Certainly before any customer recieves their product.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

To be fair, the Fiio MP3 player I bought in the late 2010s also didn’t have acceleration while scrolling, and never got it in firmware upgrades. I suspect that 80% of the market might only carry small music collections with them, and the other 20% may be regarded as not worth bothering with (except by Rockbox and the original Apple iPod)

Not having a progress indicator on the exceedingly long database building application, though, is a bit harder to excuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

This would be cool to load up with 10s of thousands of songs and to just leave tethered to your home HiFi system

[–] brillotti 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Easier and cheaper to flash mod a Gen5/Gen7 iPod and put Rockbox on it. Looks better too.

[–] Benjaben 23 points 1 week ago

Yes, but we desperately need a thriving ecosystem of open source devices. With the way electronics are going - for example, being forced to agree to a new license agreement before being able to use a device I already purchased, and the agreement forces arbitration for disputes? We need more people working on enshittification-proof devices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

While I do do electronics, I'm not amazing at it, but, I always wonder how the UIs are so clunky and slow on a processor that outpaces a Pentium 1 ,which would run Windows 95..

[–] DarkFuture 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Eh.

I'd rather have a touch screen. I don't want retro looks over functionality.

The dedicated digital music player scene is rough right now. A year ago I looked into getting one cuz my iPod finally died and I don't want to use my phone for music. I wanted touch screen and Android so I could download apps from the app store. It was surprisingly hard to find one. Ended up with a Chinese brand that works, but there's no support and the screen is real glass and broke already. I like being able to download whatever apps I want and there's a ton of storage space, but I'd really like some better options.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

best bets probably an aliexpress phone that you dont use as a phone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Takumidesh 4 points 1 week ago

If it's an iPod classic/video, you can repair them all very easily and there is huge aftermarket support.

But if you want touchscreen and android plus am app store, why not just buy an old smart phone?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I don't get the appeal of a single-purpose device like this when smartphones are practically mandatory.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I see the appeal when your music gets constantly interrupted due to every fucking app wanting to send you notifications to remind you of its existence and those constant messages from work flooding whatever communications tool you’re using.

I also see the appeal for something for kids to give them music without giving them a fill on smart device.

Yes, a phone can do almost anything, but single purpose devices can and should be better for that purpose.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

oh fuck, right, i got so used to obliterating apps ability to send notifications and ads that I forgot that's kind of the baseline experience, yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As someone who owns a digital audio player I can give some reasons:

  • Since most phones don't come with headphone jacks anymore, it's nice to have a device you can just plug your wired headphones into. It also means headphone jack inclusion is no longer a factor when choosing a smartphone.
  • Better audio quality depending on the DAC inside the device.
  • Expandable storage. Most DAPs let you insert one, some even two micro sd cards. No need to stream anything, plus you have space for lossless files.
  • No need to worry about data/wifi, your music is always there ready to listen offline.
  • Some DAPs are really small (Shanling M0 for example), making them more portable than a phone for a lot of use cases.
  • More headphone compatibility. A lot of higher end DAPs support more than a 3.5 mm jack. The Fiio m11 plus for example has a 4.4 and 2.5 balanced output jacks in addition to the standard 3.5 mm.
  • Higher power amps to power hungry headphones. A smartphone can't power say a pair of Sennheiser HD 600s, a DAP can because it comes with a preamp (not all though, depends on the specs).
  • Dedicated physical buttons. A touchscreen will never compare to controlling playback with physical buttons.

Though I will say, even as someone who owns one, unless you're really into carrying your music library with you it's generally not worth it. But they are nifty little gadgets and new ones come out every year to innovate the space.

It's similar to an e-reader as others pointed out. Sure, you can read on a phone/tablet as well but it's nice to have a device that's purpose built for one thing and does it really well. The same applies to a digital audio player. Yeah you can (and most people are fine with) play music on your smartphone, but a dedicated device does add some nice QoL to the experience.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

There's also another niche (that is frankly very annoying to shop for); Music in a SCIF. Assuming you can get the device approved. absolutely no wireless capabilities, and no recording capabilities, amongst other requirements.

More or less limits you to older ipods.

[–] SpaceOctopus 9 points 1 week ago

Smartphones rarely have headphone jacks or physical buttons for blind control anymore. They are also too large to fit most pants pockets. Their audio hardware (if it exists) is also usually quite poor.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I brings back the headphone jack and high quality analog audio for those of us who care enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Then it's not for you and that is fine.

  • I have very good wired headphones and i need a headphone out with very good power.
  • My music is also flac and I have been collecting it for decades, so it would use up all of the storage of my phone.
  • Also phone needs to serve an emergency function so I don't like its battery drained.
  • Ontop of that pixel has some notifications you can't turn off and silent mode is not an option for me so it is very good to have them separated. Especially if you want to waste life on the internet, its nice not to have your song not be intertupted with " wait till you see what happens in the end!!!!”
  • I personally also like a "master of one" devices. I have a supernote and i like that my mp3 player and notepad both only do what they say they do without distractions.
  • My cheap chinese mp3 player and cheap chinese earbuds offer fantastic noise isolation so they're great to travel with, they together also take up less space than noise cancelling headphones and sound wise I haven't seen anything sub 800 range that comes close to them.
  • They last for a long time. It plays music and that's it so 10 years is a pretty normal age for them to last. Now most cheap ones have bluetooth and preamp output as well so there is really no reason to switch.
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This debate is so, sooo old, but after all these times I've wroten arguments for having a dedicated player, I feel I singled out the most important ones to me.

It is not my phone. I enter a different headspace when I use an e-book or a mp3 player, I mentally dedicate myself to use it and enjoy it. I don't switch between apps, see notifications popping up, for if I'm using it, I can turn the beeping fucker off and just have a good time with my tired old Walkman and Sleep's Holy Mountain album undistracted. And I know I can put on the plane mode on, but it feels like an important switch to my brains when I leave my phone for a dumb player. My intent to use it, leaving everything else behind, somehow makes me enjoy my time with music more. We're all wired differently, but maybe you can feel it too.

And I'm left amused by the impressions of W. Gibson, the cyberpunk daddy, when he had his first Walkman and took a walk. Him, having a personal music headspace for the first time, seeing all these huge banner adds for early tech wonders on the streets, gave him a lot of inspiration, made him feel like he is detached from this era and brought into some distant future. For some time, he felt like a character of his novels. In some sense, it was like carving your own room from out of nowhere with a click of a button while leaving in human hives of metropolitan area. And the romantic vibes of it make me take it as another reason pro dumb players.

It's irrational, but I choose to like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Ever heard of a kindle?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

ouuuu that looks rly cool! Right in the vein of Pine64.

I like that despite only supporting SBC for now, they are looking to expand the Bluetooth codec support with updates. I think LDAC might be a no-brainer here, since it's royalty free and the encoder is open iirc

[–] ramenshaman 6 points 1 week ago

I love it. Thanks for sharing, I hadn't heard about this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I'd rather see a project that brings back legacy Zunes - completely jailbreaks or ROMhacks the Zune software. The hardware was badass and you could easily retrofit SSDs into them. The software needs some sprucing up though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] dance_ninja 12 points 1 week ago

If you look at the comparison models, it seems pretty competitive for an audiophile.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

iPod was 400 or 500 when it came out.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In the early 2000s. Depending on the generation that's around 800-900 dollars in today's dollars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tangara also has basic Bluetooth SBC audio support, with more modern codecs possible via future firmware updates.

Well SBC is basically useless so I hope the development is not too far away in the future. I see it's Bluetooth v4.2 but as far as I know the best codec available compresses down to 1 Mbps but v4.2 supports up to 3Mbps and v5 up to 6 Mbps so still room for improvements but that's up to headphone manufacturers to support these future codec.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

For the people that don't want to click through to find the code:

https://codeberg.org/cool-tech-zone/-/projects/12798

load more comments
view more: next ›