Benjaben

joined 1 year ago
[–] Benjaben 6 points 1 day ago

Man, ads like this worked SO WELL on me. I was sure having the right stuff would make me extra cool just like the commercials. Pretty messed up when you think about it, those things had a country of little dorks like me sitting around fantasizing about being liked, haha.

But we were kinda poor, and whatever cool toys I did manage to acquire did not make me any cooler, lol. Drugs, on the other hand...

[–] Benjaben 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure Maui's handled worse, should be good. Deer works well low and slow? I have almost no experience with it, woulda figured that'd work badly with how lean it is.

[–] Benjaben 16 points 3 days ago

Thanks for that! I need more of the good lines distilled. People miss that there's a ton of legit philosophy in the show (I mean beyond the scenes where Chidi is directly teaching of course). It's not just a side bit to use here and there where it helps the jokes or the narrative or whatever. I really fell in love with that, like not only was the show hilarious and FULL of interesting and likeable characters, they really made it kind of a class in (or "love letter" about?) the strengths/weaknesses/clashes to different approaches to existential philosophy.

And they did it in a way that wasn't ham-fisted, ya know? If you already knew some, you'd pick up on it, if not, maybe you'd pick up a few tidbits here and there but otherwise, just a great show without any of that! That's so hard to do well, idk, I'm just so impressed lol.

[–] Benjaben 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The biggest difference is that ...

But that's an enormous difference, and it seems like it may push us to a place of crisis before it gets better. None of the tactics are new, they're not even new to the modern era. But the reach is new, and it has enabled the creation of a large and broadly distributed group, that is thoroughly detached from and increasingly hostile toward mainstream society. With every indication that they are getting more entrenched, not less.

Aside from how spread out they can be, a group like that's not new either, and basic intuition and history both point to this being a dangerous situation brewing. We really gotta figure out how to reach one another again.

[–] Benjaben 10 points 4 days ago

Think it's just the official term used by all the park agencies.

[–] Benjaben 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)
  1. CAH is paying more than Musk
  2. CAH is using Musk's own corrupt plan (which started this), to fund some of THIS, and intending to sue him if he doesn't hold up his end of the deal.

For someone who seems to really want more left leaning stuff in our politics...you just seem to have dug your heels in on this one, without knowing very much about it. Every answered question or corrected assumption produces yet another, smaller complaint. This thing they're doing is good. Even if it's flawed, so what. It's good. So few things are.

I'm out, cheers.

[–] Benjaben 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Specifically the language seemed intended to troll such that Republicans miss the satire (not hard), get angry about the fucked up campaign finance situation, and then we can all say "yeah this has to change". I understand skepticism about achieving that, but it's a coherent goal and strategy, and I'm very enthusiastic that we're getting actual real pushback from somewhere. I'm not gonna tear it down in any way, I think it's fantastic and I want to see more clever, patriotic efforts to drag into public view the ugliness we've allowed to take root.

[–] Benjaben 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

It's satire, and it's borderline genius. The actual campaign text would probably change your opinion, it is very deliberately telling people to tweet about how it should be illegal. They give you exact text to post about how it should be illegal. It's the opposite of normalizing. Ostracizing? Idk

ETA: one of the many other things I like about it is they explain very succinctly how it works. Form a SuperPAC, buy the data from a data broker, act barely (but strictly) within the law. It really feels like one of the few serious pushes back I've seen, it's way more positive than you're thinking.

[–] Benjaben 118 points 5 days ago (45 children)

They aren't, they're calling attention to it and directly saying "this should be illegal!". It's not subtle, it's a pitch to point out that this should not be allowed.

However the website with the info (https://apologize.lol) now links to their other thing and I wonder if they are working through some legal concerns, lol.

[–] Benjaben 3 points 6 days ago

Inflation is explicitly not:

a general terms for the costs of goods and services

It's a general term for the change in the costs of goods and services. It's not a merely technical distinction and I think it explains the difference between your take and mine above.

Otherwise I mostly agree. I do think the president has a bit more indirect influence on inflation in particular than you're allowing, but otherwise I think we're basically on the same page anyway.

view more: next ›