this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
209 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36679 readers
2170 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I live in a country where smoking has generally been on the decline for a while now but even still I see thousands of cigarette butts in just about any public place. They litter the sides of the road, bus shelters, alleyways, outside clubs, bars and pubs, public toilets, park benches and just about everywhere else. Its even extending to disposable vapes now as well.

For the most part, where I live doesn't have that much of other kinds of litter about and is generally clean. And most public bins and all smoking areas have ashtrays and dedicated cigarette bins so it wouldn't be hard to dispose of them properly like any other piece of rubbish and even then there's often cigarette butts within sight of the bins and ashtrays.

Why then do people have a completely different approach for cigarettes?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Most of my family are smokers, and I can tell you that smokers are often just annoying and selfish when it comes to their smoking.

My dad and stepmom insist on smoking at the fireplace because 'the smoke goes to the chimney' (hint: it doesn't) despite the fact that a 9 year old lives here, and I remember when my brother dropped his cigarette on the ground in a forest (he put it out first) and when I noted that he shouldn't do that because animals will eat the cigarette butts he drops, since there was a nest with baby birds nearby, his defense was that the birds in the city eat cigarettes and get addicted to them, this was somehow fine or something. I still fail to see the logic there, if he had any.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

They don't see it as litter.

[–] bitchkat 4 points 1 hour ago

Because smokers are usually selfish assholes. And not terribly bright.

[–] iamdefinitelyoverthirteen 13 points 2 hours ago

There's a guy at work who would squat down and chain-smoke outside the building main entrance and littered cigarette butts all over the place.

I confronted him about it one day, and asked him to throw his butts away. Now he smokes by his car and that area of the parking lot is full of cigarette butts.

Fucking disgusting.

[–] LovableSidekick 3 points 1 hour ago

Ron Popeil died before he could invent a pocket ashtray.

[–] cley_faye 23 points 5 hours ago

If someone doesn't care about themselves, why would they care about other or littering.

[–] PumpkinSkink -3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Because there aren't any fucking public trash cans and noone is carrying that shit. Same reason you see nips everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago

For the most part, where I live doesn’t have that much of other kinds of litter about and is generally clean. And most public bins and all smoking areas have ashtrays and dedicated cigarette bins so it wouldn’t be hard to dispose of them properly like any other piece of rubbish and even then there’s often cigarette butts within sight of the bins and ashtrays.

If you can't walk a little to dispose of cigarette butts, don't smoke them.

[–] surewhynotlem 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

And yet I can drink a soda and somehow not throw the bottle onto the ground. I'm a fucking hero.

Maybe just carry a tin for your butts since it's not exactly a surprise that you have them.

[–] surph_ninja 7 points 1 hour ago

I have a Japanese friend who showed me these little zip up bags for carrying them until you find a trashcan, and they’re flame retardant. She said they’re pretty common over there, so should be widely available to order.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

He needs the Peltzer Smokeless Ashtray.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Nips are small single serving alcohol drinks

[–] [email protected] 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Somehow they seem to think that one small cigarette butt is so insignificant that it doesn't matter despite the fact that they can see these small cigarette butts literally everywhere.

[–] surph_ninja 4 points 1 hour ago

No drop of rain blames themselves for the flood. No snowflake blames themselves for the avalanche.

[–] [email protected] 141 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

They don't consider it littering. That the cigarette butt will somehow just magically degrade like a fallen leaf. It truly is remarkable how selfish smokers can be.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 22 hours ago

My first time hearing the word "biodegradable" as a kid was after asking my dad why he threw his cigarette butts into the water when we were fishing.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 21 hours ago

As a former smoker who carried my cigarette butts until I found a trash can, I truly hate those assholes.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

At least some of them probably genuinely believe that, and AFAIK it is more or less true for filterless butts. Maybe we should replace some of the gore pics we have on cigarette packets with information about environmental effects ...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scarabic 29 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Have you ever heard of “broken window syndrome?” It’s the idea that once there are a couple of broken windows on buildings in an area, quickly more will start getting broken. But if every window is intact, you will only get the occasional vandal being bold enough to break the first one.

It’s not scientific and may not even have any truth in it, but there is something to be said for the idea that if people see others doing something, they are more likely to go ahead and do it themselves.

To the point: if you see thousands of butts everywhere, smokers do too and probably consider it normal by now, and don’t care.

This only explains how things go from bad to worse. So who drops the first butt? Well: it’s the most selfish, lazy, inconsiderate guy around. There always is one.

Funny how all this adds up to the fact that we will inevitably herd behind the worst person around. Maybe that’s why we suck so bad as a species.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If you want a happier example, there's the trash in Wisconsin state parks. The Dept. of Natural Resources used to place trash receptacles in our state parks, and haul the trash away. That worked, people put their trash in the bins, because that's the social expectation.

But the DNR lacked the staff to keep up with the trash. Sometimes animals would get in and spread trash around, but mostly, people would pile trash on or around cans and dumpsters after they'd filled up. If that's where you put your trash, that's where you put your trash, right?

So, the DNR simply stopped putting trash receptacles in the parks altogether, and announced that you'd have to pack your own trash out. And it worked! Without a socially-sanctioned place to deposit trash in the park, people pack it out. (Mostly. Humans are still essentially animals, so various detritus gets dropped, but no garbage bags full of food scraps left on the ground for the raccoons.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

While I've not had the chance to visit your amazing national parks yet, I understand that they're an experience and a proper visit type of outing. I can see how that would work there because you'd hope most people visiting have made a conscious decision to go into nature, are prepared for it etc. I'm not sure a similar strategy would work in normal areas where people just exist, there I definitely think easy access to triaged trash cans is best.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 40 minutes ago

I hear ya. I just wanted to provide an example in which social norms lead people to do the right thing.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

When I smoked cigs, I was literally always the only person who'd always bother to properly throw away butts, even got a psuedo MGS4 style cigarette butt container for when no buttcans or trash cans were nearby.

A few people I'd smoke with would follow my lead.

Most of them just saw me giving a shit about trashing them properly and tell me to go fuck myself, fagg*t, etc.

Why are most smokers so frivolous, entitled and agressive with littering?

They don't give a fuck.

About their own health, or anyone else's, or the environment.

...

Other comments are saying smokers think the filters, the butts, are biodegradeable.

They aren't.

You can only use that excuse if you're rolling rollies or spliffs, or tapping out a spent pipe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most of them just saw me giving a shit about trashing them properly and tell me to go fuck myself, fagg*t, etc.

Doing the right thing is a personal attack against people who want to feel okay about doing the wrong thing.

[–] orgrinrt 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, that old pattern. Damn. I recognize it and see it way too much around. Luckily not much in my inner circles, but spaces I can’t avoid like work for example. It’s starting to eat up on me.

This is one of those weirdly specific pet peeves I have. For the life of me I can not get into the headspace where that is the outcome of the whole chain of logic and intuition that goes into having that stance, and, more importantly, holding to it despite ample chances, throughout tens of years, to change your mind or act differently. At 50, I see you’re still lashing out in this pattern? But why, man, why?

Surely it ought to feel good to see others doing the right thing, so it wouldn’t feel as bad for yourself to do the wrong thing. Assuming you can’t just stop doing it (Many habits are extremely hard to kick, so that’s entirely human and understandable, not faulting anyone for that). But this way, the total amount of good is better when it’s only you doing the wrong thing, so you can just be the margin of error, sort of? Have less of a negative impact overall. Be implicitly slightly better yourself, by this grace of others. Or at least you should end up feeling that way, or something along those lines, right? Or at the very least, feel just nothing, be entirely oblivious to the whole thing. That’d be human and understandable too. It’s a habit. You don’t necessarily think about those. You just do them.

But to lash out for that? Be conscious enough to realize this all, but instead of any other kind of understandable human way, you, of all things, lash out to those doing the different thing. I just can’t figure it out. Why? I suppose it could be a subconscious coping mechanism to shield one’s self from the fact that they are not doing the right thing, but it feels off that it would come out aggressive or you know combative some way. At others, at least. I get that you might feel bad, and “guilty”, sort of, but surely nobody’s mind goes from “I feel guilty” to “it’s your fault I’m feeling guilty”? Ugh.

I find my lack of perspective often very anxiousness-inducing. I can emphatise with such a wide range of lives and beings and situations, but there are so many I simply can’t, often similar to this specific thing. Makes me nervous about me potentially being selfish or stubborn because I can’t see it. This is one of those things. Makes me sweat, almost. Always reminds me of the “are we the baddies?” meme. Am I partially some sort of a sociopath since I just can’t grasp that mindset? What if I don’t even really emphatise with anyone, I just think I do, but what if it feels different for those that really do it? What if I am a psychopath, goddamnit, this really gets me spiraling 🥲

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 hours ago

Drag very often gets called a troll on Lemmy for using different pronouns than most people.

A troll is someone who tries to upset other people. Why would using different pronouns upset others?

Drag will tell you why: because a lot of people have already made up their mind to misgender drag because they don't respect different pronouns. But in their hearts they do know right from wrong. So they feel guilty. And that's the bad feeling. They think drag is intentionally trying to make them do the wrong thing and feel guilty.

It's ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Most of them just saw me giving a shit about trashing them properly and tell me to go fuck myself, fagg*t, etc.

What, just from seeing you not litter? That's insane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Yes.

I would just properly bin the butts, then I would be derided for this.

I wasn't evangelizing, I wasn't starting the discussion.

I would just do basic non littering, and would routinely be mocked for this.

That is how absurdly insecure and aggressive most (not literally all, but most) other smokers I've encountered or known are.

[–] rockSlayer 18 points 21 hours ago

You can only use that excuse if you're rolling rollies or spliffs

Even then, don't be an asshole and just find a garbage can

[–] deacon 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I was a smoker for about 20 years and quit in 2021 with Chantix.

For all but the last maybe 5 years of that, I just had cigarette butts on my mental whitelist. I was an otherwise very litter-conscious person who just didn't consider butts litter because...? I never reasoned it out, and was like I suddenly realized I was fucking littering and then I became hyper sensitive about it.

[–] orgrinrt 5 points 11 hours ago

It took me over ten years to realize this too, although I was young and stupid so it kind of follows. I started carrying a bag with a seal with me and if there wasn’t a public ash tray in view, I’d just drop them in there and I was so ashamed when I first started that, since it was so easy and all the things I thought would be problems, like the smell, just… literally never was. And how quickly the bag would fill up, ugh. All that used to go to the ground. Note however that I was conscious of littering and always if I knew there was an ash tray, say, no more than some 100m detour from my current path, I’d just take the extra steps to put it there. But they are surprisingly rare, especially towards the end of my smoking habit, when smoking started to really die out and be a lot less common. A lot of places, like bars for example, didn’t necessarily put ash trays by the door or terrace, which was how it used to be.

I’m lucky I got out of the habit. But I can sort of emphatise those who do it without thinking about it, especially if they are young.

Younger generations are also lucky, at least here, since smoking is so ludicrously expensive nowadays with the taxes and all, and add to that good education, I very rarely see young people smoking anymore. Seems to be mostly people in their 30s or 40s — my age group — and of us, mostly the “hillbilly” types.

I do use nicotine pouches though, to this day. Low nicotine ones, but anyway. Those are very natural for not trashing, like the Nordic snus, since the pucks/containers come with its own small compartment for the used pouches, that’s easy to clean up at home. And those pucks are very recyclable too (granted that the region has the sort of plastic sorting that differentiates washable/directly reusable containers like we do for glass) which at least from what I have seen, gets done properly a lot of the time.

In general, I think the newer generations are much more aware of all this and do a great job of being conscious of the environment, not only at the global scale, but also just the local environment and surroundings too.

Let’s just hope we didn’t fuck up bad enough so that they might have a chance at adulthood and actually transferring all that to more effective and serious politics and activism. We might just get saved ourselves, too, if they just learn to be decisive enough to push us fuckups out of the picture. God I hope enough of them have the dreams, passion and idealism to actually have that drive and fire.

This became a random tangent, sorry if you got this far!

[–] [email protected] 63 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Maybe it's because smokers already have to make the decision to blow toxic smoke around where other people (most of them non-smokers nowadays) are likely to breathe it in - it's pretty much an inherently anti-social activity nowadays, so the step to littering your smoking trash isn't that big. Maybe related to broken window theory?

[–] ChillPill 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Came here to comment on how smokers seem to congregate specifically around doors to public buildings (businesses, hotels, restaurants, ect) despite having had legislation for years that requires them to be anywhere from 5-10 metres from any inlet to a building (air vent, hvac, door, window, etc)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Oh it gets worse than that.

Many times I've attempted, and failed, to get a group of smokers (that I was a part of) to move away from a nat gas pump/valve that even my smoker self could smell to be leaking.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Because it generally takes a certain type of person to smoke and there happens to be quite a lot of overlap with the type of person who's fine with littering.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I.e. If they don't care about themselves, why would they care about anyone else or the environment around them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

they mistakenly believe that the cigarette butts will biodegrade fast enough to not be an issue.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

also they don't care that much

[–] [email protected] 34 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I don't think there's a single answer.

I used to be a smoker. And it always pissed me off how cavalier other smokers were about just flicking a butt anywhere.

Having discussed it many times with other smokers, I gotta say the major reason for out is pure fucking laziness combined when apathy. People just don't care, or think it doesn't matter, and aren't willing to put even the tiniest effort into not being assholes.

The next major reason is that smoking is basically burning a plant. There's already a factor where you're dropping ash, so there's a predisposition to forgetting there's a difference. And some people seem to think that because the cig was burning that it shouldn't go in regular trash. Those folks are usually pretty good about using public ashtrays with a dedicated disposal container. Not all of them all the time, but more often than not.

I'm not saying I never left a butt behind (I love that phrase), but for me it was only when circumstances made it such that I wasn't paying attention. High stress circumstances, and I wouldn't be paying attention to what my hands were doing. I'd be done smoking, walking back to wherever and realize I didn't have the butt with me.

There are portable options. My car didn't come with an ashtray, but there are portable ones that cost less than a pack of cigarettes, even back when cigarettes were cheaper. There's are also ones you can carry in a pocket or purse. I used to carry one in my pocket that was great because it was sealed well enough that you couldn't smell anything from it.

But, barring a rare situation where the residual ember is too dangerous to stub out and then dispose of the little bit of tobacco left with a certainty of safety, there's really zero excuse to not do that and at least carry your butt away to a receptacle of some kind, even if you're in your own yard. But if things are that flammable, you shouldn't be smoking to begin with.

Back when I would work the door as a bouncer at bars and clubs, I was kinda known for being pissy about it. I'd be smoking myself, see someone toss a butt and give them shit for it. "Why you fucking up my parking lot? Pick your shit up." Benefit of being a bouncer and looking like a bouncer is you can get away with that kind of thing. Like, motherfucker, I'm standing right here next to a giant ashtray with a disposal bucket for the butts. Don't just drop your trash. My boss at the one place said I was scaring customers. I said good, now the place won't look trashy, and you can get customers that aren't lazy assholes that leave the parking lot littered up. Besides, if a bouncer can't put a little fear into lazy assholes, why do the job? That's practically part of the benefits of the job lol.

But, yeah, the vast majority are lazy assholes. Not just the smokers, it's anyone with something small enough they don't think it's worth any effort to dispose of properly. A single napkin, straws, straw wrappers, toothpicks. Cigs are just more frequent because smokers go through then in bigger numbers, so they pile up more obviously.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 22 hours ago

To add to this, it's also modeled in our media.

Characters be flicking them everywhere, pitching them to the ground and decisively tamping them out with their foot, because that is what being cool and tough is about. The only time someone is depicted properly disposing of a cigarette is if there's an ash tray they smish it in, preferably next to a glass of hard liquor or a beer.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago

In addition to other suggestions, which are likely largely correct, I'll pose another potential factor:

Smoking is self-harm, in addition to addiction. Some people are too fucked up on depression and self-loathing to see their impact on the world around them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

If they don’t care about polluting their own bodies, why would they care about littering?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

There used to be ash trays in public spaces. Like, it was super common.

Since public smoking bans are more common, there are no ash trays anywhere. So people just throw their shit on the ground.

Removing ash trays isn't going to make smokers go "oh well, guess I should stop smoking." It makes them go "oh well, I guess there's nowhere to throw this away, it's going on the ground now."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

How often do you see somewhere to put a cigarette butt? Sure people are selfish and lazy but if there was somewhere to put them in public spaces they would be used. People who smoke in the car and toss them out the window are dickheads though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

And most public bins and all smoking areas have ashtrays and dedicated cigarette bins so it wouldn’t be hard to dispose of them properly like any other piece of rubbish and even then there’s often cigarette butts within sight of the bins and ashtrays.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I think this is a big part of it, but it's also our mentality -- in Japan, there are hardly any public garbage bins. Yet there's hardly any litter.

At least from what I've seen in North America, people seem to think it's someone else's problem that there's no garbage bin. But that's not an excuse.

[–] seaQueue 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

In the US a sizable chunk of the population watched those anti littering campaigns and said "you're not the boss of me!" then made it a point to litter more. You tell an American what to do and you've got a 50/50 chance that they'll do the opposite purely out of spite, even if they otherwise agree with you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›