CFC’s are great at coolimg things as long as you do not care about having an ozone layer.
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
393 points (96.9% liked)
Funny
7228 readers
1708 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
CFC’s are great at coolimg things as long as you do not care about having an ozone layer.
They're even fine if you care about the ozone layer so long as you never ever let any leak. Until the coolant leaks the CFCs are cycling in a closed system in which they can't do any damage. The problem is that "not letting any leak" is harder than it sounds, and the newer coolants just don't do the job as well.
It's like how asbestos tiles are fine until they get damaged, and then they fuck the lungs of anyone unfortunate enough to breathe in a tiny bit of it.
I thought that was over
The ozone hole is mostly repaired, because we stopped using CFC's.
Yup much like with acid rain Reagan and George HW Bush stepped up environmental regulations to confront the problem.
As most of the problem was due to America’s use of CFC’s it was their issue to solve.
Although hugely inefficient in both materials and energy.
Reliability tends to be in opposition to efficiency for mechanical stuff. Yeah, it sucks more energy which is bad, but if you use 50% less stuff for an efficient unit but end up replacing it 4 times while the old one still runs you end up using more materials.
We need a happy medium between as efficient as possible but only last for a few years and reliable but very inefficient.
Cost is the third point of the triangle. You can get good efficiency and reliability if it costs more.
That might be true for materials but a large percentage of those can likely be reused while energy inefficiency is a much larger problem.
Also louder, bigger, noisier
Draft Punk
Draft Punk
They're called window rattlers for a reason.
I love when it’s a hot summer day and you’re in a big city. You get to play my favorite game of “is it raining or are there ACs dripping on me”
And noisy as hell, and they take up way more space, and they look trashy
And breed bacteria and mold.
Mold. So. Much. Mold.
A common feature was to let the interior fan blades sit above a pool of condensate and flick water over the coil to aide in cooling.
This is not appropriate for humid weather.
Where I lived as a teenager, we had a window unit that couldn't easily be removed. Second story window, required a ladder. After multiple years, and some issues, we took it out, I disassembled it, and found ALL of the styrofoam, fan, and housings, to be coverered in mold 😬 Dry, dark, crusty. It was a whole world in there...
I installed a mini-split system in my house, each individual unit has a couple of safety switches that need to pressed in in order to operate and make sure you still count to ten after sticking your grubby little fingers up its fan. Some of the units work as intended, others, a Christmas tree of error codes and mystery breaks loose if you even think about touching those switches funny. And every single one has to be set to a random degree beyond what you actually want before the thing even tries to turn on. LG deserves suffer slowly in the fires of Mordor for all eternity for the atrocity they have created.
a Christmas tree of error codes
I'm a programmer and I still try to avoid appliances with a computer in them. It's impossible to avoid every sort of computer unless you buy vintage stuff, but something like a microwave with a digital timer is still OK. However, something with wifi or a display showing more than the basic seven-symbol characters is out.
The old stuff is often not just less annoying but works better. For example, my old washer/dryer each took about 20 minutes for a standard cycle. My friend's fancy new ones take an hour. Dishwashers have the same issue. I expect that the modern ones use less water and electricity, but I don't think the savings would be worth the inconvenience even if they used none at all.
Dishwashers have the same issue.
Newer dishwashers cycle the same water through repeatedly during the wash cycle, only bringing in fresh a few times during the process. Old ones from before they were concerned about water efficiency would just pull in fresh water and drain out dirty water instead of cycling the same water through repeatedly during each phase of the process.
Because they only run clean water it takes less runtime on the older dishwashers but they're also constantly pulling in fresh water. It's also why newer dishwashers require more cleaning out filters - they don't just drain to the drain, so they need to care that the water draining won't gum up the sprayers and such because it's going to go back through. The point is that they use much less total water to get the job done.
A lot of the new ones, as you said, take longer because they default to an eco mode and use less resources. Mine at least has a mode that ignores that and just goes all out.
I usually don't use it because it's easier to just plan ahead and I don't really ever need it to finish that fast.
It's also nice that it can tell if something needs more or less washing by checking the water occlusion.
Both my split systems are "dumb" where their only controllable out the box via an IR remote. A couple of ESP32-C3 later and their WiFi enabled without the calling home jargon that comes with the oem add-on wifi modules.
My dryer is a heat pump - it takes longer than the old unit, but the energy consumption is far far less than the unit we had installed from the 80s. No need to make modifications to the house for a vent, or have the machine vent humid air into the house during a cycle either. Safety is another big plus on the dryer, old units are horribly dangerous by comparison.
Huh, I have an LG and haven't had any issues like that at all. My only complaint is home assistant can't manage them directly and has to go through their cloud.
If you feel like being adventurous: https://community.home-assistant.io/t/lg-ac-wired-controller-integration-via-esphome-esp32/582954
Oh that's super interesting, thanks for the heads up.
If it was unreliable I'd do this, but despite going through the LG cloud it's pretty bulletproof and instant. I just have to open their app every 6-12 months or so to accept a new EULA. Really shows how shitty their app is though, since their cloud back-end seems solid.
Edit: Oh actually, this feature might sell me on doing it: "the unit doesn’t make annoying sounds when settings are changed by this controller"
im sad my 20 year ild one just died, but we are going to get a heat pump instead of fixing the broken one. the broken one uses the super toxic old stuff (even though it worked very well, it was missing parts, and hadnt been serviced for a very long time, heh)
I also had one for 20 years. The standing newer model one I got threw a belt in about five years and was garbage.
Standing ac are inefficient though, yes?