this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
284 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19267 readers
2184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Antony Vo, convicted for participating in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots alongside his mother, has fled to Canada and applied for asylum instead of reporting to prison to serve a nine-month sentence.

Vo claims his conviction was “political persecution” and part of a government conspiracy.

Currently living in Canada with his mother, who also faces federal charges, Vo believes Trump will pardon Jan. 6 rioters.

U.S. authorities have been actively searching for him, while his asylum application remains under review by Canadian officials.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tillyrblue 127 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seeks asylum in another country while probably having a problem with people seeking asylum in the US

[–] whostosay 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Well his situation is different. Did you ever stop to consider that?

[–] Tillyrblue 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thats right I forgot he is one of Trump’s “warriors”

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

9 month sentence? Just go do it you pussy. I've served longer for possession of fucking WEED.

[–] Tyfud 37 points 3 days ago

You have to understand though, these people are cowards who absolutely do not think the laws or rules should apply to them, because they've never faced any consequences in their life up to this point.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As a Canadian I feel like I just saw a rat scurry under my bed while I'm snuggled under the covers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, now We got to root the bastards out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Since Trump's going to pardon them, justice will never be done by the judicial system. So if justice is to be done, it will be by other means.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Keep Alberta rat-free

[–] Bonesince1997 48 points 3 days ago

Do the time, assholes

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Get him the fuck outta here.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's just waiting out the clock, Trump is almost certainly going to pardon his insurrection accomplices.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would he do that?

What do they have to offer him now?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Adoration from his base.

It's a mistake to assume because he's been voted in his base has nothing left to offer.

For him to fully seize permanent autocratic power or even implement the most horrific parts of his agenda, he needs Congress to stay under his thumb. The pardon will cost him nothing, and keep his base rabid, which will keep Congress in line.

Edit: A few important additional reasons:

  • Trump never admits he's wrong and never forgets being "wronged."
  • Pardons continue to overwrite history of Jan. 6th with the narrative he was the victim.
  • They help create noise to drown out signal as to whether it was an insurrection, demotivating people to further seek justice.
  • They solidify further his claim related prosecutions (including of him by extension) were politically motivated.
  • They demoralize his opponents by subjugating reality to his own narrative (a classic Putin move, maybe not coincidentally).

It's doubtful he consciously thought any of this through. If probably just "feels right" to him. But in typical Trump fashion, by pardoning those involved, he'd be doing something deeply nefarious for coincidentally shallow narcissistic and instinctive reasons.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

Someone else on Lemmy referred to him as an instinctual fascist, and I really thought that was a succinct way of framing the "just feels right" aspect you laid out here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if he has to physically sign each pardon. That alone could keep him from getting everyone off.

[–] clif 2 points 2 days ago

I doubt he's ever gotten anyone off.

[–] sturmblast 16 points 3 days ago

Sounds like a something a piece of shit traitor would do. Fuck that guy and his mother.

[–] normalexit 19 points 3 days ago

Hopefully they catch another charge for resisting, which isn't pardoned.

[–] madcaesar 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is why trebuchets were invented. Load them up and yeet them back to the USA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Make sure you secure a rope around his neck that will reach over the boarder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

No need to bring another character into this

(It's spelled 'border' when talking about the line between countries; a boarder is a person renting a place to sleep)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this headline needs some work. I can see a few different meanings...

dude is seeking asylum in Canada with his mom

they're both seeking asylum because they skipped prison

dude skipped his prison time (for some other offense) to go storm the Capitol with his mom (awww...)

one or both of them stormed the capitol, got prison time, skipped it, and have fled to Canada to ask for asylum.

...

probably some others...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

They probably did that deliberately, to draw you into reading the article to solve the conundrum

[–] someguy3 16 points 3 days ago

Well he only has a few more weeks until he's pardoned.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Send him back. We don’t need no seditionists.

[–] Lennny 2 points 3 days ago

Just shoot him and save us both some tax money. He's Asian so the people that should care, won't.

[–] theangryseal 1 points 2 days ago

Ain’t you about to be da fiddy first state doe?

[–] affiliate 5 points 2 days ago

“I really thought that the police were keeping their oaths to the constitution and were stepping aside to let us exercise our constitutionally guaranteed rights,” he told WISH. “I thought it was totally permitted.”

on one hand, this is so dumb that i have a very hard time believing anyone would actually think this. on the other hand, he is a trump supporter, and he did walk into the capital with his mom and then take pictures of it. i’m really at a loss here.

[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is one of donvict's patriotic heroes. He should come on home since donvict will likely pardon all these pillars of humanity.

"Political persecution", LOL.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They could just return Jan 20 at noon, and kneel and lick the boots of their master and beg for a pardon, and maybe get a pardon.

[–] jaybone 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some 4d chess there. When Canada becomes the 51st state, they’ll have to extradite him. But when Canada becomes the 51st state, all Jan 6ers will be pardoned.

[–] bitchkat 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hypothetically, if Canada and the US merged, wouldn't they add like 10 states?

[–] whostosay 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They know so little about Canada that they think it's just one continuous state.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Technically there are zero states in Canada

[–] whostosay 3 points 2 days ago

True, was just using it loosely kinda like we call our states states in the US, but it could also refer to a nation state, or separate providences, etc