this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
105 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

60208 readers
2402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

If we're really lucky, maybe they'll patent the idea and then everyone else will have to stop doing it.

[–] Sanctus 56 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So its social media without the social part?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

maybe the most raw form of corporate media

[–] VubDapple 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It's para social. The person consuming it feels as though they are part of a relationship. EFIT: like TV but more interactive.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

Damn, we're refining Fahrenheit 451's "Families" already.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Parasitic more like.

[–] jaybone 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would anybody want this?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The line has to go up.

More engagement = more views = more ads = more money for the shareholders

Doesn't matter how that engagement is generated, whether it's human content or AI trash.

Late stage capitalism is hell.

[–] P1nkman 28 points 4 days ago

Science: "Look, we're destroying the earth, and this graph explains it."

Shareholders: "Great job. Now for the next fiscal year, line must go up, so continue what you're doing if you want to keep your job to survive, else, we'll take our money and give it to someone who can make the line go up."

[–] gedaliyah 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Isn't that what Facebook is already?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

But now they can directly sell the AI manipulation instead of watching others sell it.

[–] dinckelman 36 points 4 days ago

The mental gymnastics they had to fucking do there. Absolutely insane

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

Literally the dead internet theory

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago
[–] TomMasz 28 points 4 days ago

Eventually, it will be all AI-generated users, selling AI-generated products to each other and Zuck will no longer have to pretend to be human.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Owen noted that while AI characters could be a “creative new entertainment format”, there was a risk that they might flood platforms with low-quality material that undermines creators’ craft as well as erode confidence among users.

"Hey, humanity, how's it going?"

"The world's most technical minds have found a way to make social media worse just to squeeze out just a little more profit"

"Jesus Christ"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dead Internet Theory on purpose.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

For facebook that's a good thing lol

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

It makes me think of Fahrenheit 451 where everyday people would sometimes become bit actors in these long form tv/hologram shows and describe the other actors as their friends and family, even though they never actually interacted beyond the scripted bits.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 18 points 4 days ago

Typical of Meta to steal an idea from every social network on Earth, including its own, and make it 90% bots. They haven’t had an original idea since pokes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Even more reason for staying as far away from anything meta/fakebook

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Headline sounds as if they want to replace all the users with AI

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

In their defense, it should make the numbers look good.

[–] DesertDwellingWeirdo 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Politicians and corporations will be able to pay and use these bots to influence users on policy and politics like they would with advertisements. They're cutting out the shadowy troll farm and PR firm middlemen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

They will use still use bot farms, but they become much more automated and effective . Doubt PR firms and influence peddlers are going anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Imagine training an AI of yourself and gifting it to your grandma to hang on her fridge.

[–] spankmonkey 5 points 4 days ago

No, I don't think I will.

[–] friend_of_satan 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Who needs grandma's love and attention when an artificial surrogate can consume it and dump it all into an aggregated user profile of grandma instead? /s

Meanwhile, my late grandmother was the kind of woman who would notice the television distracting from a conversation, turn it off, and say "tv dominates the room." I miss her a lot.

Plus AI can't eat grandma's peach cobbler a la mode.