this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
796 points (99.5% liked)

Stick Enthusiasts

773 readers
6 users here now

A place for enthusiasts of sticks of all shapes and sizes. We all love a good stick! Is it a walking stick? Light Saber? Gun? Looks brown and sticky? You decide!

Feel free to post sticks to rate, sticks that look like things, memes about sticks, long winded rants about the superiority of birch sticks over oak, anything stick related! Natural sticks are preferred, but modification and ornamentation is also fine.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
796
Well, does it? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Found this post on IG and I'm wondering what this community's stance is. With winter now officially here*, I think it's a valid question.

Edit: *where I live

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kerrypacker 7 points 2 days ago

This is why there are 12 types of Christianity. No it's not a stick and I will crusade against anybody who claims it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Bread sticks
Stick of butter
Stick of dynamite
Carrot sticks
Stick shift

I feel like there's enough precedent to allow the Ice stick, given the circumstances

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Well played.

[–] Serinus 119 points 4 days ago

Local variants of sticks are acceptable.

[–] finkrat 1 points 1 day ago

You can melt and solidify metal but that is considered a rod, not a stick

You can melt and solidify water

That is a rod of ice

[–] Podunk 80 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I just realized there is an entire continent where there are no trees, and thus no sticks.

And it isnt a small continent either. it is larger than all of Europe and also larger than Australia. We arent talking about an island or archipelago or even some random landlocked desert. It is a continent.

the fact that there are no sticks that naturally occur there at all... it confuses and concerns me.

This is deeply unsettling to me.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, flowers are starting to bloom more and more on Antarctica.

Soon, trees will start to grow so even that continent has sticks!

Wait ... that is even a bigger concern to worry.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

When humanity has to move to the poles to survive, I'd rather have trees than not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender 11 points 3 days ago

Before it slipped down to the bottom of the world, it used to be covered in jungles.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

also larger than Australia

Not all that well-known, but Australia claims about 42% of Antarctica as part of it's territory.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Don't worry. At this rate, the ice will be gone soon and... oh

[–] Podunk 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So i did a little research. The sad/fun part about my realization is... if you go back far enough in time, before the ice and nothingness, archeologists have pointed out that Antarctica was once a massive forest continent.

Millions of years ago, it had trees, and thus, sticks for days and days.

Once again we are living in the wrong time. Too late to explore all continents having sticks. But also too early to live where all continents have sticks. In the grand scheme of things, we exist in the uneven ground.

It's a sad equilibrium to be sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

It makes sense why there are no sticks. But I agree, the thought of a lack of sticks seems to be unsettling, not a lack of trees or bushes.

Are we that naturally attracted to sticks because of primate evolution? I wonder if the earliest human ancestors developed this awareness of sticks as it is a primitive tool used to survive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We grant you the rank of honorary stick.

[–] agent_nycto 6 points 3 days ago

Motion seconded

[–] BambiDiego 7 points 3 days ago

"This is acceptable! This is fair!"

[–] [email protected] 78 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is likely an extremely powerful weapon that can only be used once before it breaks so save it for the last boss.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck, I beat the last boss and I forgot this was in my inventory...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Along with 999 medium health elixirs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

That's an icicle, sticks are wooden. I like his spirit though, that icicle has stick vibes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'd say an icicle defines as a stick. A stick does not need to be wooden (like a stick of dynamite).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I guess it depends on how much of a stickler you are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

the “stick of dynamite” argument really gums up the works here. i reckon it’s under the larger stick-umbrella, but still doesn’t meet the criteria of JUST “a stick”. think like, a capital-S-stick in the same way christians refer to capital-G-god.

an icicle is the “other minor deity” of sticks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, it's a stick of ice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

ice-stickle

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

My first glance I thought it was a narwhal tusk o_o

[–] AeonFelis 20 points 3 days ago

It is an ice sculpture of a stick.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope. Ignore the pandering milquetoasts.

A stick is a stick. This is not one. Do we have no standards?

[–] naught101 2 points 2 days ago

What are you, some kind of stick adjudicator?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago
[–] spittingimage 21 points 4 days ago

Can you poke things with it? Can you swish it around and pretend it's a sword? Does it bring joy to your heart? Then it's a stick.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is there no flotsam from elsewhere washed ashore in Antartica?

But independent of that, I think that's an awesome ice stick!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

can't bring sticks? i have questions

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago (6 children)

You can't bring anything that could carry non-native lifeforms on it, to preserve Antarctica's unique Flora and Fauna from invasive species.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

What, not even our nice Norwegian ~shape-shifting assimilating microbes~dogs?

EDIT: I am sad lemmy doesn't appear to support strikethrough.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Lemmy ~~doesn't~~ support strikethrough.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you poke someone in the butt with it?? Fuck yeah you can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just like dopamine and serotonin: If you don't have homemade, store bought is just fine

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

shore brought is fine

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"...there are no sticks here. Nothing grows..." so far...

[...] we demonstrate a clear but nonlinear trend towards a greater area of vegetation cover across the [Antarctic Peninsula] in recent decades [...] Crucially, the rate of change in vegetation cover has increased considerably in recent years

[...]

Regardless of the complexities discussed in the preceding, the overall statistically significant trajectory of APwide greening from 1986 to 2021 [...] provides strong evidence of rapid and ongoing response of AP vegetation to climate change, and presents a compelling case for future widespread changes in the AP’s terrestrial ecosystems.

load more comments
view more: next ›