this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
475 points (91.2% liked)

Memes

45317 readers
2325 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy 239 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Kinda has a stench of "the wealthy get taxed too much 😢"

The IRS doesn't get that money. The IRS processes that money and prevents your lottery-ticket-buying-ass from hoarding it all, and redistributes some of that unnecessary wealth to the utilities and services were all invested in together as a society.

[–] danc4498 209 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If only actual billionaires got taxed that much...

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what happens if you take it out as a lump sum. If you choose to take your winnings over an extended period of time (20 years or something), it is taxes more like income.

That said, I totally agree with you!

[–] wolfpack86 15 points 1 year ago

A significant amount is "lost" when you get immediate payout versus the annuity. The lottery will invest and be able to pay out more over the thirty years, thus they offer less the the lump sum

On 1.2 billion over 30 years, the average tax rate will not be significantly different year to year vs the avg tax rate on a lump sum.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The poor smuck probably claimed the lottery as an individual. He should have opened a company and claimed the ticket so that he can expense out a lot of his taxable income

/s

I am 99% sure this is not how it will work in this specific scenario but does otherwise when it’s business as usual.

[–] dustojnikhummer -1 points 1 year ago

For the last time, you can't tax net worth.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sadly, the IRS isn't properly staffed or equip to go after rich people...

[–] foggy 32 points 1 year ago

Yeah good thing they take it from lottery winners up front.

[–] rifugee 15 points 1 year ago

I heard this eloquent way of saying it the other day:

The IRS doesn't have the money to go after people with money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Like schools

[–] nomadjoanne 1 points 1 year ago

Ackchyually...

[–] Got_Bent 104 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So we do all realize that advertised jackpots are annuitized amounts and that the vast majority take the net present value lump sum, which is usually about half the advertised amount, right?

Winner probably got about six hundred million, of which roughly forty percent was taken for taxes give or take state income tax rates.

[–] nogooduser 36 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not being from the US I didn’t know that. That takes something from being completely unreasonable to be understandable.

I can’t believe some fake rich guy on the internet lied to us!

Still, if they’re not idiots the winner doesn’t have to work again so they’re still good.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That takes something from being completely unreasonable to be understandable.

Why would taxing a gross income of above a billion US$ by ~66% be "completely unreasonable"? Imo taxes for such incomes should generally be higher if anything.

[–] nogooduser 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that’s not how it works. It would be great if that was how it worked for all billionaires but it isn’t.

Taxing 66% of the winnings of someone who was previously not wealthy is unreasonable if you don’t also tax other rich people at the same rate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, obviously that should go for everyone. I realize it's currently not very realistic in most countries, but I maintain that it would be reasonable. It's also not without precedent, even the extremely capitalist US had top income taxes of above 90% from the mid-40s to the early 60s.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Historical_Income_Tax_Rates_and_brackets.png

[–] DharkStare 2 points 1 year ago

When you win the lottery you have two options:lump sum or annuity. If you take the lump sum you basically get half the advertised amount and then pay taxes on that. If you take the annuity, you are paid out over 30 years and you pay taxes on each payment. It's also setup where they pay you more each year over the pay period.

If you go to USA Mega, you can see jackpot analysis for PowerBall and Mega Millions where you can see the complete breakdown on the payments.

[–] transientDCer 2 points 1 year ago

You can take a lump sum payout or get it paid to you over 20 years. The lump sum is usually around 60% as the other poster said.

[–] Cortell 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you live in Canada as well lottery winnings aren’t taxed so you get the whole lump sum. Other countries probably vary too

[–] nogooduser 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t think that you are taxed on lottery winnings in the UK either.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

I did not know advertised jackpots were annuitized. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Congratulations to the lottery company who was allowed to advertise a $400m prize as $1.28b.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep, that's the real issue!

Over here it's not taxed so prizes are smaller but they represent reality!

[–] mstrk 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

where? In Europe (euromillions) only prizes below 5k are exempt of taxation everything else is taxed 20%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mstrk 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

You'd get significantly more if you didn't take it in a lump sum

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

Damn, only half a billion dollars you didn't have before. Might as well not even bother.

[–] Ryan213 19 points 1 year ago

Is it even worth collecting the prize at this point?? /s

load more comments
view more: next ›