this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
152 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39352 readers
3633 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump on Friday added the 27 countries that make up the European Union to the list of trade partners he’s threatening with tariffs — unless the group takes steps to import more U.S. goods.

“I told the European Union that they must make up their tremendous deficit with the United States by the large scale purchase of our oil and gas,” Trump posted shortly after 1 a.m. on social media. “Otherwise, it is TARIFFS all the way!!!”

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23 5 points 2 hours ago

he's just going full Oprah with these things isn't he?

did someone tell him it's a game like duck duck goose?

tariff. tariff. tariff. tariff. tariff. tariff.

Donald, you can't give everyone tariffs!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

"Did you just said we have to build more solar power and fuck you?"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Great. In the end, Europe and China are even closer... Voting for idiots has consequences.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

Yes, it seems that if he has his way, the whole world will have to unite against the USA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

@ America, if you want us to invade and establish a real democracy, just call us...

Best regards, The Germans

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

The Germans, circa '40 FTFY

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago

hope everyone enjoys argentina style 200% inflation

[–] [email protected] 59 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

OK. The rest of the world can forget the US for the next 4 years. We'll see you guys in 2029 if there's anything left.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't the US leading the world in AI? How else will the world access chatbots that make confidently make shit up?

[–] TheBat 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They even made one a president!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

"Hello America this is John Henry Eden"

[–] [email protected] 67 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

He has found an efficient way to damage every economy and the planet at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Interestingly enough, his tariffs are slowly expanding to cover everyone that Putin/Russia considers an enemy, and his original plan for major tariffs on China are conveniently no longer mentioned. I'm sure there's absolutely zero correlation of course.

[–] Sanctus 23 points 13 hours ago

If we had anymore evidence for Trump's sphincter hugging Putin's wrist it would be lost in the mountains of that which already exists.

[–] HowRu68 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

He is an efficient expert.. in demolition. We should make a top 10 list. Including Putin, Bashar-Al-Assad, Musk and others.

Edi: sorry, just realised that Putin and Al-Assad fall in another special category.

[–] 9point6 29 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Interesting he's had the idea to force the world to become less dependent on trade with the US

Kinda thought of all things he wouldn't want to risk reducing the value of the dollar like that

Edit: won't this also make the prospect of moving more global businesses abroad more appealing?

[–] Dragomus 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I'd say "dew it"!

Let's see if your top-secret-paperwork dumpsite mar-a-lago can pay for it's flowers and Gouda cheese selections.... And how long 'till it will serve domestic boxed Florida Swamp wine and "bubbles" since Italy or France won't ship anymore.

In his mind it's a trade deficit that the EU refuses to buy the US' chlorine drowned chickens, or make their own coca cola without corn syrup...

[–] orclev 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

So, not to detract from your overall point, but apparently there's functionally no difference between soda sweetened with sugar and corn syrup. The reason why is after a month or so of sitting on the shelf the acidity of a carbonated drink has converted all the sucrose (table sugar) into a 50/50 mix of glucose and fructose. Corn syrup is a 45/55 mix of glucose and fructose.

So while a corn syrup sweetened coke would have ~5% more fructose than one sweetened by sugar, the difference is so minuscule as to be effectively identical. In other contexts (such as in baked goods, candies, or non-carbonated drinks) there is a difference between using sugar and corn syrup, it's just in the specific case of carbonated drinks that it doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Other than, you know, taste. People can tell the difference in blind taste tests. And most people prefer the sugar sweetened version. It's just that in the US the corn lobby will not give you the option to choose anything else.

[–] orclev 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You actually can't taste a difference. The taste tests are between so called Mexican coke and US coke, but it's not apples to apples. Mexican coke is a different formula which is why it tastes different, it's not just corn syrup replaced with sugar. For instance Mexican coke has less than half the sodium of US coke. People prefer the Mexican formula, not the sugar.

Edit: for comparison here's the nutrition label of Mexican coke and US coke. Notice the sodium and carbohydrate quantities. The formulas are different, it's like comparing Sprite and Sierra Mist, they're a similar flavor but ultimately different.

You can also just watch this: https://youtu.be/NY66qpMFOYo

It explains all of this and debunks every possible argument for why sugar might be better than corn syrup in soda.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Big corn would never lie. Line goes up.

[–] orclev 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. None of this is based on anything claimed by the corn industry but rather on a series of studies that were done (technically one paper followed by a paper by a different group refuting that paper due to it overlooking an important detail).

For a pretty good explanation of all of this check this video out: https://youtu.be/NY66qpMFOYo

[–] [email protected] 14 points 13 hours ago

Can someone just declare war on us already and end your suffering

[–] random_character_a 6 points 13 hours ago

Mr Cheetos has an interesting view on free market.