this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
116 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39208 readers
3261 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukraine is pushing for NATO membership, proposing that only areas free from Russian occupation join initially. President Zelenskyy argues this could deter further Russian aggression and facilitate peace talks.

However, key NATO members, including Germany, oppose the idea, fearing it could escalate the conflict. France, Poland, and the Baltic states are more open to partial membership, while former NATO chief Stoltenberg supports fast-tracking the process.

NATO's new Secretary General Mark Rutte prioritizes arming Ukraine over membership discussions.

U.S. policy remains uncertain, especially with President-elect Trump reportedly skeptical of Ukraine's accession.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose 35 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Escalate how, exactly? Is Russia going to be at more war with Ukraine?

And WTF do they think is gonna happen after Jan 20th?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's sickening how so many people are willing to just sacrifice Ukraine to appease Russia. When they say "escalate", what they really mean is "make us feel some of the hurt that Russia is sending Ukraine's way".

[–] brucethemoose 4 points 14 hours ago

Not even that, they really just need to pay more taxes to help Ukraine.

But nope.

And Russia wouldn't dare bomb NATO unless they want to get totally screwed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They might escalate by getting other countries soldiers to.....oh yeah......

[–] brucethemoose 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

What could they do, enlist North Korea?

Thats an Onion headline, surely...

[–] disguy_ovahea 20 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

“Hard to predict the Trump factor” is absurd. They need to be approved for admission before January 20th.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Get Ukraine in NATO now! Let Trump ragepost on Twitter/Stupid Social, he's going to forget about it before the day his tantrums have consequences.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

As inventive as Zelenskyy's solution is, I don't think you can ignore borders like that and ask the international community to recognize a separate, untouchable region that's somehow distinct from the rest of Ukraine. I'm all for less restrictions on how Ukraine fights back, but I don't have much faith this Incremental approach to joining NATO will work. I feel like if NATO wanted to or had the capacity to waive the part about joining while involved in conflict, we would have already seen something.

[–] brucethemoose 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The entire point of NATO is to defend against Russian aggression, so waiving parts of rules seems like fair game if addressing that goal so directly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Like I said

I feel like if NATO wanted to or had the capacity to waive the part about joining while involved in conflict, we would have already seen something.

You'll have to take those concerns up with the member states. I'm not trying to espouse whats physically possible, Putin getting assassinated tomorrow is physically possible, don't make your plans around it though. I'm trying to understand this plea in the context of who it's made to and where we are after years of this.

[–] brucethemoose 5 points 16 hours ago

I suppose there hasn't been much urgency and thr goal of many members is 'stability,' but they are now facing a new reality where, according to historical precedent, there will be much less stability after Jan 20th, and there is new urgency to bend rules before then.

[–] baronvonj 8 points 14 hours ago

Zelensky isn't really proposing for NATO to admit only part of Ukraine. He's suggesting the existing recognized borders be admitted, but only unoccupied parts of Ukraine fall under article 5 for now. That would prevent Russia from occupying any more land and hopefully bring them to a negotiating table to peacefully return the occupied land. After which the whole of Ukraine would fall under article 5.

[–] Buffalox 5 points 16 hours ago

Of course we can if we want to.

[–] JigglySackles 1 points 14 hours ago

It doesn't have ti be complicated