this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
181 points (84.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12483 readers
2356 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 109 points 1 week ago

It's still just money laundering

[–] ambitious_bones 90 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For anyone else wondering:

"The artwork owner is given a certificate of authenticity that the work was created by Cattelan as well as instructions about how to replace the fruit when it goes bad."

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is it really the same artwork, in that case?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 92 points 1 week ago

Snack of Theseus

[–] Maalus 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bingo, that's the point. It's a statement on the value of art. At the end of the day, a painting is just a piece of linen with shit smeared all over it. You might as well just tape a banana to the wall and be done with it. But it also shows something else - art isn't just paint smeared canvas. It has meaning behind it and it evokes emotion.

So this guy eating it and pissing off 90% of people does the best thing that he could have done. Also, the remaining 10% know that it is not about the banana on the wall which was replacable. It was about the emotions - the outrage, the trolling. It is the same artwork - since art isn't just paint / just a banana.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This is something I've never really stopped to think about until now, but this artwork is actually a piece of genius.

It's an idea, or a concept, expressed in the form of a banana taped to a wall. It cannot be destroyed, or duplicated. You can tape a banana to a wall, but there can be only one banana taped to a wall. You can destroy the banana, the tape, or even the wall, and the artwork remains, because you cannot destroy an idea. In fact, someone already has eaten the banana.

Furthermore, everyone talking about it merely increases the value of the piece.

It's absolutely genius.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildcardology 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ductaping a banana on a wall needs instructions?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Don't underestimate how dumb people can be.

[–] Agent641 7 points 1 week ago

Howtobasic taught me how to touch wall with apple

[–] aesthelete 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The type of idiot that pays 6.2 million dollars for a duct taped banana exhibit needs those instructions.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 week ago

It's one banana, what could it cost, 6.2 million?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Anyone who says the rich deserve to BE rich because they are "clever businessmen" need to repeatedly kicked in the balls.

Most folks could live comfortably for the rest of their lives on what this idiot spent on a banana.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Moderate investing of $6.2 million with a 4-6% return would amount to a monthly payout of $25,833/month. Very comfortably.

[–] Serinus 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Which is why it's really weird for people to be so greedy after they've already accomplished five million.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Accumulating money is addictive. These people have an addiction problem and we all suffer for it :/

[–] DoYouNot 1 points 1 week ago

If some is good, then more is better, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

25,833 USD a month will result in the ultimate comfortable lifestyle. A big house, car, 100% Healthcare. Everything you could possibly need and a loy more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

And here I am glad that my savings account interest pays for my phone bill+90% of my car bill. Meanwhile I could just be buying a new car every month, instead, with a small loan of $6M

[–] LowtierComputer 4 points 1 week ago

All people really...

[–] Agent641 63 points 1 week ago

This is a special keystone headline used to warn time travellers to keep on driving to the next timeline, this one is cooked, attempt no landing here

[–] Modva 59 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I'll never understand spending that money like that instead of helping kids with cancer.

Probably one of the several reasons why I am not rich.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

It's usually an investment. Or in this case: a publicity stunt.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] itsathursday 32 points 1 week ago

Fuck this insufferable world.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~surely the banana is rotten by now wasn't this years ago~~ yup he just replaced the banana so he just ate... a banana, which he could've done with every previous banana that went rotten too if he doesn't mind soft bananas

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Wow food prices have really risen.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I respect every part except "crypto entrepreneur".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think it adds to the contemporary symbolism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Idk it seems par for the course

The 34-year-old crypto businessman was last year charged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission with fraud and securities law violation in relation to his crypto project Tron.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

There's never been a better time to reference Arrested Development;

"There's ALWAYS, money, in the Banana Stand"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] horse_battery_staple 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thank you! The whole point of the artwork is that it can reproduced by anyone.

[–] iAvicenna 8 points 1 week ago

wow that is a very long article to say bullshit

[–] VubDapple 7 points 1 week ago
[–] brucethemoose 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

NFT artists kind of hide behind the oldschool art world to justify it...

I think it shows how stupid that world is.

The point of art is to move people, to make them think and feel something by conveying the artist's thoughts, not be a store of value. And while I've been to museums with gorgeous pieces, if you're paying millions for a painting, at some point most of that value is the gratification of hoarding it. That same money could buy you an incredible experience in today's art landscape, but it's not about the experience, is it? And NFTs are like the perfect deconstruction of that.

That being said, OP I am downvoting your post because eyeballs are exactly what crypto bros want, no offense :P

load more comments
view more: next ›