confused supporters of U.S. president-elect Donald Trump
Interesting tautology there.
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
99 points (98.1% liked)
AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
1103 readers
841 users here now
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
❻ Don't be a dick.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Well, these Trump supporters are sure doing a good job of showing why the florist in TN needed to bar them from entry.
Shouldn't take reviews from people who've never visited or ordered anything from a shop.
Software designer here. Quick question on the spec. How do you want us to validate that?
if visited == true
next
Unethically invasive data
Public toilets with stool analyzers.
Totally invasive idea here but just spitballing.
Take a photo at the location, upload photo so that EXIF data can be used to geolocate you at the business you are reviewing. Photo doesnt have to be used in the review, just as a passkey to verify you were St least present at the place you were reviewing at least once.
Cons: faking EXIF data let's people review places they never went to, sharing a photo with a horde of review bombers so they can all upload it and still reviewbomb the place
Fun thought experiment.
Good enough. What percentage of the population do you figure has even heard of EXIF, let alone how to spoof it? And of those, who would go to the trouble for a fake review?
"Hey fellow believers, use this image for verification so we can review Jim's Unrelated Entity we're currently harassing! FB doesn't want you to have this image so go to X!"
and I never had to explain EXIF to my horde of undedicated monsters.
Presently probably not a huge amount, but its an easy thing to disseminate once it's figured out.
You could keep a hash of a photos EXIF data so that the same photo can't be used for two different reviews, to prevent spamming, but that's a whole other set of questions and problems to build a solution for storing that.
It'd be a fun problem to work on, but wouldn't ever be 100% secure from exploitation. Might be a fun weekend project to get a proof of concept working.
Ask in a stern voice if they're sure they were really there?
Qr code in the location, you have to scan it to post a review. Your phone keeps track of the last years worth of lcation qr codes, and you have automatic permission to review anything youve already reviewed.
OTP
Trump-supporting hateful dumbasses, more like.
In the days since the owner of Memphis-based Everbloom Design...
Holy shit! She's local. I'm going to pay a visit to support my local businesses.
As dumb as blocks of wood and not nearly as useful.
Of course they do. They have now become Scientology.