AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND
This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
view the rest of the comments
Good enough. What percentage of the population do you figure has even heard of EXIF, let alone how to spoof it? And of those, who would go to the trouble for a fake review?
"Hey fellow believers, use this image for verification so we can review Jim's Unrelated Entity we're currently harassing! FB doesn't want you to have this image so go to X!"
and I never had to explain EXIF to my horde of undedicated monsters.
Presently probably not a huge amount, but its an easy thing to disseminate once it's figured out.
You could keep a hash of a photos EXIF data so that the same photo can't be used for two different reviews, to prevent spamming, but that's a whole other set of questions and problems to build a solution for storing that.
It'd be a fun problem to work on, but wouldn't ever be 100% secure from exploitation. Might be a fun weekend project to get a proof of concept working.