Wikipedia?
this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
26886 readers
2873 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Strictly speaking, I believe that it's Creative Commons rather than public domain. Pretty similar, but IIRC it addresses some differences in European law.
Great resource, but it's not in the public domain.
I can't speak to public domain or not but it is available for download. If Wikipedia had a problem with it being downloaded, I'm sure they would be asking Google to remove the Kiwix app from Google Play.
what does being able to download it have to do with it not being public domain?
I can't speak to public domain...
Commenter admits that it isn't public domain. So Wikipedia isn't a great suggestion for this answer, although I would argue that it is indeed "very valuable or worth archiving"
Wikipedia is under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License which again, isn't public domain. However it is a largely permissible license which allows people to do close to whatever they'd like with the material - which some people might find similarity with the public domain if they don't know how the licensing works.
Tons of books. Basically anything made before the 1900s.
I haven't done it myself, but I plan to watch a bunch of pre-Hays Code movies from the late 20s and early 30s. Many of these movies are in the public domain and more are entering it for the next few years.