this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19229 readers
3422 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is bracing for major upheaval if Donald Trump returns to the presidency, with anticipated cuts to staff and environmental protections.

During his previous term, Trump rolled back over 100 environmental regulations, leading to staff departures and a weakened EPA.

Now, with plans under “Project 2025,” Trump allies aim to dismantle offices focused on environmental justice and pollution enforcement, prioritize loyalty in staffing, and potentially reverse Biden-era policies on PFAS, lead, and climate regulations.

EPA employees express heightened anxiety, fearing intensified ideological interference.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] disguy_ovahea 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yup. Without planning or support, and during a pandemic, Trump was able to repeal 112 environmental regulations in his first term. He’ll definitely be more damaging this time around.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/climate/trump-environment-rollbacks-list.html

[–] Kyrgizion 40 points 1 month ago

He already said he wants to divy up all protected lands and sell them to the highest bidder. All your national parks will become playgrounds of the 1% and off limits to vile proles such as us.

[–] Kaput 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Curious, How many of those regulation were put back place in the last four years?

[–] disguy_ovahea 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Regulations are written by Congress. The Republicans controlled the House this term, so not many. Legislation is much quicker and easier to repeal than to enact.

Many of the climate actions that can be directly overseen by the President have been addressed by Biden. He rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement, revoked the Keystone Pipeline permit, created a 13 million acre federal petroleum reserve for Alaskan wildlife, greatly increased oil site lease cost, signed $7B in solar subsidies, invested $66B in passenger rail, enacted the Inflation Reduction act to support clean energy, increased energy efficiency standards on cars, appliances, and industry, and created new permitting rules to streamline transmission lines, all in one term.

[–] Kaput 2 points 1 month ago

Informative, Thank you.

[–] NocturnalMorning 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Seems stupid to get rid of pfa, and lead enforcement. That will affect even the dickheads who are repealing the laws.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not when you have money to mitigate or even remove problems. The 1% are a sheltered bunch. It's like The Purge movies. The people that commoners would probably like to get to are the most protected by their money and what it can buy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hah lol no. PFAS are so pervasive already that you get exposure from wind coming off the ocean at a beach. Only way the 1% can keep themselves safe from pollutants would be to buy hermetically sealed bunkers to live in and never come out. Oh wait, never mind...

https://theconversation.com/billionaires-are-building-bunkers-and-buying-islands-but-are-they-prepping-for-the-apocalypse-or-pioneering-a-new-feudalism-223987

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 1 month ago

Lol no.

"You can just buy a different environment" is an immediately self-disproving statement.

[–] Blue_Morpho 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They don't care. They will be in the hospital dying of cancer and mail in their Trump vote.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 1 month ago

Trump-brand cancer!