this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
137 points (96.6% liked)

Fediverse

28366 readers
858 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Bluesky is a corporate hedge to delay the social network business from becoming not a business, it is headed by variously naive or disengenous tech people who believe they are creating the future when they are mercenaries for the past.

You know when you see oil company commercials and they have lots of footage of wind turbines, solar panels and other ecofriendly crap? That is bluesky.

[–] Alphane_Moon 2 points 2 days ago

Bluesky is a corporate hedge to delay the social network business from becoming not a business, it is headed by variously naive or disengenous tech people who believe they are creating the future when they are mercenaries for the past.

That's a great sounding description.

It's too bad we can't add it to their about about page.

I personally lean towards disingenuous though. Tech oligarchs and their lackeys are many things, but not naive.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 days ago

That's actually... quite accurate.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This strategy has been working pretty great for oil companies. They've managed to extend their existence for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (13 children)

Misskey and Mastodon are two different types of open-source software for running a social media microblogging website that can interact with each other through the ActivityPub standard.

Bluesky is a similar but incompatible software run by a single company that was founded by ex-Twitter employees and is funded by billionaires and cryptocurrency scammers.

[–] b34k 67 points 4 days ago (3 children)

So what I’m hearing is… Bluesky is the only one that actually has a chance of going mainstream

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand why that's always true but yes

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's because businesses tend to focus on super easy access, user interface and user engagement first, while open source projects tend to focus on tech and often forget about the end user experience.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I guess but with mastodon I literally cannot imagine it getting any easier.

Download app -> make an account (the app will default to some instance, at least it did for me) -> use it exactly like Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do you follow someone you discovered while browsing a foreign instance?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Open app on phone and search them up.

Or go to the instance I use and search them up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bluesky:

  • Download official, fully featured app and not something utterly crippled
  • Looks and feels like Twitter
  • No weird tech mumbo-jumbo (WTF is a server, is that like a Discord server, what's that gotta do with Twitter) confusing you because there are no instances to choose from
  • Make an account
  • UI, UX, look & feel 100%, 1:1 fully identical with immediate pre-Musk Twitter
  • No need to get used to anything because literally everything stays precisely the same as what you're used to, only that it's no longer "Twitter" or "X" or "tweets"
  • Use it literally precisely the same as Twitter
  • Pretend you're still on Twitter, it won't make a difference

If Mastodon wanted to compete with this, it would have to

  • replace its default Web UI with an even more faithful clone of the immediate pre-Musk Twitter Web UI,
  • replace its official app with something that's absolutely identical to the immediate pre-Musk Twitter app in all but name and branding
  • remove the instance chooser without introducing any other option of joining any other instance than mastodon.social
  • completely hide decentralisation and instances from newbies, ideally for a few months or years after they've joined
  • introduce a content-forwarding algorithm like the one on X, but better
  • forcibly ban Mastodon's user-grown culture and force pre-Musk Twitter culture upon everyone
  • mollycoddle its users for months or years so that Mastodon really feels like "literally Twitter without Musk" by shielding them from not only all hints that Mastodon is different, but also from the entire rest of the Fediverse
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe wasn't that way before, but when signing up on Bluesky now you are asked to choose a instance (bsky.social being the default), and the username contains the instance name, exactly like any Fediverse account.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Good to know.

Strangely, people don't seem to mind.

I guess then a key difference is that Bluesky is presented to 𝕏 users as the same kind of monolith as 𝕏 whereas Mastodon is presented to them as a huge number of instances from which they absolutely have to pick one.

[–] deus 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware, the big "problem" with Mastodon (and the Fediverse as a whole) is that you have to choose an instance to join. It's an aditional step that mainstream social media does not have and it's already enough to push regular people away. It's kinda like trying to convince a Windows user to jump ship to Linux, by the time you begin explaining what a distro is you've already lost them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Like I said in my comment tho. When I downloaded the app it automatically chose for me. I just made an account there and boom.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

So you didn’t get the choice at all? I guess people who sign up this way are going to be really confused why they can’t follow some accounts their friends can.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yes the choose was there but it automatically was filled with a default instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

You can choose. But you don't have to.

The official Mastodon app has a box where you can pick one out of several hard-coded instances. It defaults to mastodon.social. You can pick a different instance if you want to. But you can also ignore it, scroll past it and let yourself be conveniently railroaded to mastodon.social without even knowing what an instance is.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is that helpful though? Isn't that the same as everyone registering at Lemmy.world?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

If you've never in your live chosen anything that has to do with IT, if all you know is centralised, monolithic silos, then you can't be expected to first choose one out of literal dozens of microblogging projects in the Fediverse and then one out of dozens, hundreds or thousands of instances.

The Fediverse would be a whole lot smaller if not all newbies who didn't come from Reddit were railroaded hard to mastodon.social. Oh, and Lemmy would be a whole lot smaller without Redditors having been railroaded first to lemmy.ml and now to lemmy.world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel with mastodon it's different because instances don't host communities to subscribe to. Just people to follow

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@secret300 @fediverse @can There are bots that cross-post posts, they actually implement groups.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Oh neat I didn't know that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wasn't it founded by the original founder of Twitter, not ex-employees? Not that it makes much difference...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Afaik it was an internal project at Twitter at first that was spunn off as a seperate company some time before Elon Musk bought Twitter. Jack Doresy only invested some start capital and was a board member for a while.

[–] jqubed 9 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Any significant reason to make an account with Mastodon vs. Misskey (or I seem to remember the latter having several forks?)?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

It's the culture of an instance that makes the difference, not which software it runs, but there is often a correlation. Misskey tends to get more people who appreciate cute emoji and comfy vibes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

I prefer Misskey (Misskey fork at least) because it's just much more feature rich, Mastodon doesn't even have quotes, on the other hand Misskey has a lot of cool stuff like markdown, more customization, avatar decorations, emoji reactions etc But to each their own, from minuses Misskey has it's own API so the variety of apps is smaller compared to Mastodon

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mastodon is your coworker who’s honestly well-meaning and kind, but seems to have fits of upset for seemingly no reason at all and random beefs and drama with people that arise from nothing at all. She’s not very good at her job, but she can get it done, and she seems like a sincerely good person, which is enough that people like her.

Misskey is the employee who’s incredibly efficient, but has her own system that no one else can make sense of or follow. You have to just let her do things the way she wants to do them, but it all works. She does not hang around with anyone, just comes in and does her thing.

Bluesky is the guy who is always talking buddy-buddy while either wasting time or asking people for things, blows coke in the bathroom, is constantly hyping himself up. He seems to be very qualified, but it’s hard to tell how much of that is an act, and he’s also clearly a huge piece of shit. For some reason he is wildly popular with everyone.

You didn’t ask, but Bonfire is the IT guy who seems to live in his windowless office, wears T-shirts to work, speaks to no one, and is personally responsible for about 40% of the company’s products and services. Most people have no idea who he is.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I really like the way you described Mastodon compared to all the other platforms.

Keep up the good work.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Adding random information regarding Misskey. Misskey is specifically created to tackle Japanese internet culture and its own interpretation of fediverse.

For example, Misskey software allow the instance owner to run ads (usually community ads like promoting indie games, open for art illustration, or vtuber) while Western-made fediverse software are anti-ads.

Misskey also allows a lot of fun feature like social games, blogs, groups, emoji reaction, Misskey-flavored Markdown (people are getting wild with it).

It also have drive, which allow user to reuse existing uploaded image without using additional server storage.

Also, fun achievements!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

Misskey is way more interactive. Dang!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

https://itsfoss.com/bluesky-vs-mastodon/ This is a comparison about Mastodon vs Bluesky.

Misskey is most similar to Mastodon. Bluesky is also a bit similar to both but still the most different one from the other two. All three are different social networks. Mastodon and Misskey are ActivityPub compatible, meaning they can "speak with" other ActivityPub compatible social networks, e.g. Lemmy, Pixelfed or PeerTube. Together, that's what's called the Fediverse (different federated social networks being able to talk to each other). Bluesky is based on a similar, but different protocol called AT Protocol. It also means it's possible for social network services using this protocol to be compatible to each other. But not sure if it's there in practice yet, if there are even other social networks using this, and so on.

I'd recommend using Mastodon, and in general ActivityPub compatible social network services. They're all open source, anyone can host a server (which is very important, because if the server operator ever does any bullsh!t you're not forced to stay there and still can remain on the social network, just from a different node), they're federated (servers can talk to each other and usually do unless some specific servers are blocked on purpose by the other server), and they're compatible with multiple services also using the same protocol. And there are "big" networks already existing using ActivityPub, most notably Mastodon and Lemmy of course. Also, Meta's Threads is also using ActivityPub, however some Mastodon instance hosts have decided to block Meta's servers (there are good reasons for doing so but explaining this would make this post even longer).

Bluesky is controlled by a company made by ex-Twitter employees, I think its federation capabilities are still limited right now(?), and one can't be so sure how its future is going to look like under these circumstances. We've all seen what happened to Twitter after Musk bought it, so I think only the true, unrestricted open source social network platforms like Mastodon, Lemmy, Pixelfed, Loops.video, PeerTube and so on are the future.

[–] Eldritch 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Mastodon and miskey are interface's to the same open public protocol.

Bluesky is another, largely private, twitter like microblog. That can, but may never in a significant sense allow something close to what the fediverse does.

load more comments
view more: next ›