this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
41 points (90.2% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3228 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
41
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/politics
 

A new internal memo by Tony Fabrizio, chief pollster for all three of Donald Trump's presidential campaigns, tells the former president he's in a radically better position than he was right before the 2020 election.

Why it matters: The memo reflects the exuberance that Trump staffers and allies exude in interviews and behind-the-scenes conversations. The optimistic framing could make it even more difficult for Trump followers to accept a loss as legitimate.

The memo, addressed to "TEAM TRUMP," has the subject line: "PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ON THE VERGE."

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lettruthout 58 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey conservatives: Trump is doing so well that you don't have to vote! You can stay home! He'll win easily without your one vote!

[–] IphtashuFitz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

After all, Trump did say you wouldn’t have to vote ever again.

[–] lettruthout 3 points 2 weeks ago

Good point. They could even start with this election!

[–] DirkMcCallahan 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure he's being told that, but if the polls are to be believed, he IS in a radically better position than he was this time in 2020.

Which is absolutely horrifying.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Seriously... This time it more than likely isn't bullshit. I honestly feel like it's a guarantee he wins at this point...

[–] reddig33 19 points 2 weeks ago

This sounds like propaganda designed to be leaked to provide spin.

[–] dhork 19 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't they tell him the same thing if his chances were bad though? He doesn't seem to be the type of guy who would take bad news well.

[–] fubo 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This just in: Yes-men say "yes"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's even worse than that I believe. They've all probably been instructed to never show any doubt regarding the election outcome in any hard correspondence to prevent rebuttal evidence in court.

They're not even yes-men. They are simply obedient little bitches.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I like how the betting market odds have changed. Kamala +170 must have been too tasty to pass up, I know it was for me.

What I don't get is Trump was like -200, but Republican president, Democrat popular vote was +240... in what world is Trump going to win the popular vote???

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 2 weeks ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Axios:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that Axios is generally reliable. Some editors consider Axios to be a biased or opinionated source. Statements of opinion should be attributed and evaluated for due weight.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.axios.com/2024/10/31/trump-2024-election-polls-memo?utm=axios_app
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support