this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
45 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ccunning 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternate (More accurate) Headline:
Washington Post editorial writers’ endorsement of Kamala Harris stopped by CEO

“The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

The Washington Post’s editorial writers had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for president, according to four people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive newsroom matters.

[–] zenharbinger 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So much for Democracy Dies in Darkness

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that's all I've ever seen it as.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 1 month ago

That’s all it ever was. Well, besides being a sick joke.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Apparently so.

The Onion's ironic? slogan is 'Twilight's Last Gleaming'... which is now essentially a perfect parody of WaPo's slogan, in that it is now 100% accurate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Fuck Bezos.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was wondering how long Bezos would leave them to their devices. He's been far more cautious about revealing his politics but Amazon's frothing anti-union subterfuge speaks at least something for itself.

He's typically left WaPo alone, so I just wonder whether what's changed is that Bezos feels the writing is on the wall. Maybe sensing a Trump victory, like the hyper rational alien he is, he decided blocking a Harris endorsement is the right move to position himself best for the post-democracy, oligarchical and fascist America on the horizon.

[–] dhork 8 points 1 month ago

He figures that if Trump wins, he will seek retribution, but if Harris wins, she will not seek retaliation at all. Which would you choose, if you had no morals and didn't mind casual fascism as long as you get to keep your insane wealth?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Huh, that's an interesting new Amazon User Policy update.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 1 month ago

Absolute 100% pure, uncut, organic, artisinal bullshit.

Fuck the WaPo. Shit eating cowards.

[–] uberdroog 5 points 1 month ago

Stop shopping, Amazon. It's making everything worse.

[–] TipRing 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our oligarchs are drooling over how much power they imagine gaining in a Trump presidency and will do everything they can to ensure the manipulible fascist wins so they can have the kleptocracy they have been dreaming of for years.

[–] Sanctus 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And they'll keep dreaming about it right on out the 3rd story window if he does win.

[–] TipRing 2 points 1 month ago

"But I didn't do anything wrong!" - Last thoughts of a fascist oligarch.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 1 month ago

The New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The New York Times:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The New York Times is generally reliable. WP:RSOPINION should be used to evaluate opinion columns, while WP:NEWSBLOG should be used for the blogs on The New York Times's website. The 2018 RfC cites WP:MEDPOP to establish that popular press sources such as The New York Times should generally not be used to support medical claims.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/business/media/washington-post-presidential-endorsement.html?unlocked_article_code=1.U04.NYTO._LhIjylYYLB7&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support