this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
-23 points (29.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3402 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Given the state of the GOP, and who would be beating the "liberal" candidate, this makes a lot of sense. Probably some decent reading for anyone still thinking they just won't vote because Harris isn't progressive enough. She might not be your cup of tea, but I'm betting the other guy is way less so.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

They're already moving right. I don't think a lot of Americans fully understand how radicalized their politics have become over the past 20 years or so. Even your most radical leftists, like Bernie, is pretty moderate when compared to politicians in other developed democratic countries. Harris isn't very progressive to begin with, she's just infinitely better than Trump which makes her look like the best candidate in history.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly.

Today's Democrats are Republicans from 20 or 30 years ago.

There is no left in the U.S.

[–] return2ozma -1 points 1 month ago

Michael Moore sums it all up in a few minutes from his documentary:

https://youtu.be/MVnIatb7iVI

[–] givesomefucks 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The last president before neoliberalism got it's death grip on the party was Carter, and even the "moderates" can't stop talking about how amazing he is, while refusing to ever go back to candidates like him.

Like, the vast majority of voters don't even know the first presidential platform with universal healthcare was Teddy Roosevelt over a century ago.

Anyone that says we "need more time to evaluate" is lying or has no idea what they're talking about

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Carter was the first neoliberal president.

https://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/

The only difference is he actually seems to believe in it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Harris isn’t very progressive to begin with, she’s just infinitely better than Trump which makes her look like the best candidate in history.

did acab stop being a thing because of her?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Acab can't stop being a thing until they all stop being bastards.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Harris is doing multiple campaign events with Liz. Fucking. Cheney. A warmongering, anti-LGBT, anti-choice neocon. Remember when she threw her own gay sister under the bus to try to win an election (which she lost anyway)? I do. Now I personally haven’t decided if Harris is right to use Cheney like this, but it doesn’t feel great to a base voter like me who remembers 9/11 and her family’s Iraq hawkery. The Cheney family used to be universally reviled on the left, and this effort is doing a fair amount to rehabilitate her reputation with some dems, and I’m not thrilled about that.

I’m voting for Harris, without a doubt, but she is already moving to the right, at least as a political strategy. FFS she has already promised to put a Republican in her cabinet!! If she goes any further in that direction she’ll be at a serious risk of losing some dependable progressive base voters. But as some other comments have mentioned, if she wins there’s no reason to believe she won’t continue rightward.

[–] Carrolade 4 points 1 month ago

Let's not ignore the Tim Walz pick when she could have gone with the Pennsylvania guy. If she's going to run as a coalition president, she has to offer every part of the coalition something they will like.

But yes, I do hope it is mostly campaign rhetoric. We'll see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Harris is doing multiple campaign events with Liz. Fucking. Cheney. A warmongering, anti-LGBT, anti-choice neocon. Remember when she threw her own gay sister under the bus to try to win an election (which she lost anyway)? I do. Now I personally haven’t decided if Harris is right to use Cheney like this, but it doesn’t feel great to a base voter like me who remembers 9/11 and her family’s Iraq hawkery. The Cheney family used to be universally reviled on the left, and this effort is doing a fair amount to rehabilitate her reputation with some dems, and I’m not thrilled about that.

i have similar memories & thoughts pertaining to biden & clinton with 10450; doma; don't ask, don't tell; ICE & immigration reform; etc. experiencing first hand how our collective memories about biden stop working before 2008 shows that reality of the past doesn't matter at all. every time we're in this situation we collectively agree that there's a problem; but then we opt to do the same things over and over again (eg democrat or republican) instead of trying something new.

no one knows what the right answer is; but we know what the wrong ones are because we keep doing them and here we are; each time squabbling all over again and thinking that the next time will be different despite doing nothing different to make it happen.

I’m voting for Harris, without a doubt, but she is already moving to the right, at least as a political strategy. FFS she has already promised to put a Republican in her cabinet!! If she goes any further in that direction she’ll be at a serious risk of losing some dependable progressive base voters. But as some other comments have mentioned, if she wins there’s no reason to believe she won’t continue rightward.

here's one of the clearest examples: we know democrats are moving rightward and we know that they're usually the lesser evil. so we support them more often in the hopes that they don't fully embrace a rightward movement and they move rightwards anyways and we have no leverage to get them to change because we're going to vote for them anyways.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

100%. It’s tragic that we’re so incapable of remembering the lessons we convinced ourselves we’d learned from all your examples and more. Biden’s chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee still gives me nightmares…

[–] anticolonialist 3 points 1 month ago

Biden’s chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Which we are still feeling the impact from, like much of his legislation as a Senator

[–] jordanlund 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Harris wins, expect Democrats to move right. It's pretty much what they do...

[–] givesomefucks 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Regardless of anything that will ever happen, two things are certain:

Neoliberals will say it proves the Dem party needs to move right. And Republicans will say they need to move to the right.

Because the same billionaires and corporations pay them to move everything to the right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So where does this leave those of us who want things to move back to the left? Where do we go from here?

[–] anticolonialist 9 points 1 month ago

Democrats have filled the void left by Republicans shifting further to the right. This is the end result of Clinton's triangulation of the 1990s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

~~If Harris loses,~~ expect Democrats to move right

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Harris loses, I don’t expect the Democratic Party to exists as a meaningful political presence in a couple years, because I anticipate aggressive and violent persecution of any and all people who don’t vociferously support Trump in any and all regards.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I feel like your comment is the real reason. Why wouldn't we believe the maga people even they say they want to arrest and execute? The left may not literally exist if certain people follow through on their rhetoric.

[–] d00phy 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Adding to this: All politicians will always go where they think the votes are. Of course there's some nuance to this. Trump doesn't think he has a chance in Hell of winning a state like NY or CA. Sure, he'll do some appearances, but everyone knows it's a lost cause. Same w/ Harris and the red flyover states. But if polling shows there are votes to be had and the campaign is willing to "shift" their stance, they will go after it. Every. Time.

I keep seeing people post and/or suggest on Lemmy that the US is overall more liberal than our national representation would suggest. If that's the case, why is the national polling still so damn close!? If I'm not mistaken, national polling reflects the hypothetical popular vote - i.e., no Electoral College bullshit. I even got into a pretty good discussion not too long ago over how voters can pull the Democratic party back to the left - by holding their collective nose and voting for the "left" candidate and holding the party's feet to the fire if they keep sliding right. At this point, any vote that isn't for Harris helps Trump get reelected. Regardless of what anyone thinks will happen in a Harris administration, we all pretty much know what will happen in a second Trump term.

Yes, the Dems have been pulled to the right by the GOP and the nature of the Electoral College, but an argument can be made that they've been pushed as well by apathetic, otherwise liberal, voters not voting. I get it. Every time I walk in the ballot box, there's a growing part of my brain that wants to vote for the craziest MF'er on the ballot in the hopes that all this nonsense will just burn down so we can start over. So far, the other side of my brain is still winning that argument. I did not enjoy voting for Biden. I won't enjoy voting for Harris. I didn't really enjoy voting for Obama the second time. But I'll still do it because the alternatives (including the "burn-it-down" one, for now) are worse.

[–] anticolonialist 1 points 1 month ago

Dems have been pulled to the right by the GOP

Bill Clinton's triangulation did that to us, not the GOP. As dems kept shifting right to get more votes, the GOP kept shifting even further to the right.

[–] Ensign_Crab -1 points 1 month ago

Democrats will move right no matter what happens.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 1 month ago

Vox - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Vox:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.vox.com/politics/378977/kamala-harris-loses-trump-2024-election-democratic-party
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support