I feel that direct video evidence of Trump partying it up with Epstein would still be rejected by his worshippers.
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
385 points (99.7% liked)
News
23649 readers
3826 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
He said it himself years ago, he could shot someone on 5th avenue and still be praised like an idol, he's like Homelander in S3 final https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWAKlnR6MLs
Probably. But he needs more than the MAGA faithful to get elected.
It really annoys me that I have to keep explaining this.
i would pay money to see @[email protected] just go off on someone
I don't. I just get more and more sarcastic until my eyes roll back into my head and shoot into my brain and kill me.
Seriously though, since becoming a parent I almost never truly lose my temper.
i know, that's why it would be worth a price of admission to see
After cleaning your first blowout nothing seems so bad does it
My daughter didn't shit for like 3 days after she was born and I was getting worried. Then one day, I was holding her out on the balcony and suddenly my hand was all wet. It all came out at once and a diaper was nowhere near enough.
It definitely puts what you've had to deal with in life so far in perspective.
And I'm a man. I imagine pushing that thing out of you does the same... although my wife is still pretty good at losing her temper.
Kids do change many people. I think the last time I truly lost my temper I realized what a bad example I was being and haven't really freaked out like that since.
I lost my temper at my wife a while back. And for good reason. I almost never make a true request of her like I really need her to do something on a high level of importance that had to do with my mental health and she basically blew it off a couple of times. I was pissed off to the point of packing a bag and leaving.
But that's really rare.
Look at the polls - 49% ARE the faithful
No. Voting for someone is not the same as being faithful to him. You are making the same error his supporters made in 2020 when they said everyone who voted for Biden loved him.
I know it will take more than that to put him back in, but the faithful feed the ignorant.
It will take a lot more than that. MAGA faithful are less than 30% of the country. Every new detail about how awful Trump is shaves another few voters away. And it's only going to take a few.
Thanks for the perspective. I want to agree with you. Pessimistically, I feel like I'm watching a train wreck. My family is reducing their voting to single issue so they don't have to feel guilty about who they are voting for. I have to imagine that there will be many Republicans that choose not to vote because they can't bring themselves to vote for either.
They cannot be saved or forgiven at this point.
Can anyone explain to me what makes this trial "special"?
As in: In what kind of trial do you have to UNSEAL evidences ?
Should they not all be brought up to the court as soon as they are available to have a fair trial ? Why is the defendant even able to ask for the evidence to not be used ? I'm struggeling to make sens of this…
An accused can request that evidence against them be sealed for lots of reasons. Usually because it might prejudice public opinion before guilt has been established in court. In this case, Trump’s attorneys argued that releasing the information to the public could interfere with the election. The judge’s response was that not releasing it simply because it might affect the election would itself represent interference by the court.
The judge’s response was that not releasing it simply because it might affect the election would itself represent interference by the court.
Delaying/hiding important information interfering with an election? Who would have thought! Oh wait wasn't he also convicted in civil court for... paying to hide information and trying to cover it up?
Clearly he knows the importance of information and how it can interfere with an election including not releases it.
Thank you for your explanation !
It feels a bit silly to have evidences kept away when they could speed up the process, or even change the very outcome of it…
Also glad that the judge is not a morron can see how it would be important for the elections.