this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
890 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39327 readers
1679 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Diplomats walk out on Israeli prime minister’s speech at UN to protest against devastating war on Gaza and latest attacks on Lebanon

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 210 points 2 months ago (11 children)

He is such a fucking scumbag. Fuck him and fuck the rest of Israel.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 141 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

Fuck the USA, and every country too chicken shit to oppose a criminally corrupt sociopath committing war crimes to delay his own imminent corruption trial and imprisonment.

[–] gnomesaiyan 63 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Fuck the USA government, you mean. I only live here, and all I get to do is choose between the lesser of two evils every 4 years. What a nightmare.

[–] Zorque 48 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If you think you only get a choice once every four years, that's part of the problem. There's elections every single year, many of which you have more choice and more power over.

Maybe if people showed up to vote more than once every four years we'd actually see some effective change.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The US election system is set up for the rich and powerful to stay in charge. It's ridiculous that there's effectively only two parties, and it's ridiculous that a single person, the president, holds so much power. No accountability. Their system needs an entire overhaul, IMO:

Compulsory voting Ease of access for voting Preferential voting Lower bar for running, meaning every citizen has the opportunity to run

[–] Zorque 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The president sure gets the credit for a lot of things (the president signed this into law, the president enacted this policy) but in reality Congress makes most of that a reality.

There is also accountability... but only if the congress acts on it. Which is where that whole "vote more than once every four years" thing comes in. Congress has power... we just have not elected people who use that power responsibly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, obviously. If you blamed the entire population for its governments actions then every human alive is guilty.

Fuck the US government, and everyone who supports their crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] wolfeh 138 points 2 months ago (4 children)

including scores of women and children

This always assumes that there are no civilian men. I get that men are the ones usually conscripted, but... that's always seemed weird to me.

[–] AstridWipenaugh 58 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It makes for a more defensible argument. No sane person is going to argue that a 4 year old child is an enemy combatant. But a 20 year old male? It's easy to argue they could have been an enemy combatant and so maybe the numbers are inflated. Saying 1000 people can be interpreted as 999 enemies and only 1 civilian casualty. Saying 1000 women and children is usually interpreted as 1000 innocent lives lost.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's true, but super fucked that women get the innocence of children and men are assumed to be not innocent in any situation.

Life is harsh when you're a guy.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Given the Israeli position on military rape, it's just a different flavor of attrocity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 14 points 2 months ago

But a 20 year old male? It’s easy to argue they could have been an enemy combatan

The age old problem of "excess males" solved by declaring open season on anyone with facial hair.

[–] Evrala 53 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In Gaza casualty numbers any adult man is assumed to be a combatant by Isreal.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And a child is assumed to be a future combatant.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And woman a combatant factory?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

They’ll probably start calling grains of sand terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Anyone past puberty actually.

[–] Maalus 17 points 2 months ago

Call to emotion, nothing else. Women and children "sounds" worse than "people" dying.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 6 points 2 months ago

I mean, a score is 20. I think that means they've killed two thousand scores of people. "Scores of women and children" doesn't really do that justice.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If he is still able to speak and be heard, then they arent loud enough. Every single person in that room needs to be screaming to demand his immediate arrest.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Good point, them leaving says I don’t want to be involved not that I want to stop the injustice.

[–] wurzelgummidge 4 points 2 months ago

It's the only way they can express their revulsion at Israel, and the US who constantly block anything else they might try

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Cool. Now do something that stops him. Going for a coffee won't save lives.

[–] Badeendje 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

The UN is a forum for dialogue. Expecting the UN to do something other than either say stuff or help by mandate supported by countries just shows you don't understand what their purpose is.

Walking out in this case sends the message. If these countries want to do something about it they can, other countries might intervene on Israëls behalf. The UN provides a forum to discuss this kind of stuff. So countries don't end up in wars they did not want.

[–] brucethemoose 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Maybe so... but I feel like this is one of the biggest mistakes in the post WWII order. Imagine what things would be like if the UN had more teeth (and no security council)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Imagine what things would be like if the UN had more teeth (and no security council)

well then russia would be right about NATO lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Only the US (or Israel's Arab allies bought by the US) can do that and yeah.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

why isn't he arrested already? I wish I had similar privileges, where I could break laws (thst don't violate human rights ofc.), make a shitload of money and travel the world freely.

[–] Azamandriel 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now if they would actually take action.

[–] pingveno 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, they'll pass another strongly worded resolution.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which the USA will find a way to veto or Israel will continue to ignore it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cley_faye 13 points 2 months ago

We've always been good at walking away, closing our ears, turning a blind eye…

load more comments
view more: next ›