I don’t think we should let speedy drivers determine the limits.
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
80 points (94.4% liked)
United Kingdom
4092 readers
83 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Speedophiles.
(Gas) Pedalphiles
Yeah, but that only works in countries where you mispronounce any word beginning with ‘pae’.
What about countries which use 'pe' in place of 'pae'?
They must surely be too busy confusing child abusers with foot fetishists for us to worry about it
I’m not sure what to suggest, you’ve had a few hundred years to catch up :-P
Forget it, let's go watch some associations football instead. You call that soccer right?
I wouldn’t know, I don’t follow it or know much of its history. All I know is it dates back to the Middle Ages. Lots of history. And culture of our own.
Ideally the design of the road should bring the speed down. Speed humps, snaking S's, flexible poles close to the driving area, etc
You can't effectively legislate away a safety issue, using fines. Make the system safer.
This is exactly my issue. I'm not against 20mph in urban areas, but 20mph limits on roads that are clearly designed for 30mph (or more) are a lazy solution. Every subconscious instinct of an experienced driver on these roads will be telling them to drive at 30 so they have to consciously focus on the speedometer to stay within the lower limit for prolonged periods, particularly with the proliferation of speed cameras we have in the UK - my fear in a 20 zone is often now that I'm going to cause an accident because I'm so focused on the speedometer and not the road.
The right solution is to actually turn these roads into 20mph roads (not 30mph with 20mph limits) through simple road design measures that will align drivers' subconscious perception of the road with the speed the government wants them to drive at. I recognise that this can't happen overnight but I see no effort by local or national government to even start investing in the set of changes needed to make 20mph sustainable. If these roads just felt like 20mph roads then people would be a lot less annoyed at driving within the speed limit and the government wouldn't just be stoking up a massive political backlash that will end up returning them all to 30mph and abandoning all the road safety and air quality benefits that these policies are supposed to deliver for us.
Set your cruise control for 20 mph, sit back, set your seat to 'massage' if you have that luxury, close your eyes, and enjoy the ride.
I've talked to so many fucking idiots about this that don't get it.
Look roads are for cars and we all did a driving test and we know how fast is safe. Numbers don't mean anything.
I should be able to drive 60 down a residential if I think I can. If some kid gets run over then that's their fault and their parents. Roads are for cars. What you expect me to slow down and be late for work? I was already late when I left and this is going to add minutes to my journey people just don't think.
I know I'm a good driver, I've only ever got points for speeding and for drunk driving (but I was still driving well). There some fucking idiots on the road I agree but we shouldn't all be punished. We need more roads so we can go faster that's the real issue.
this has got to be some solid satire
Idk... He's missing the /s
It seems satire tho.
Aren’t you too busy running a pub and a farm to be on here posting?
Well played.
1 bump 😂, on the assumption this is satire despite no /s.
This is the united kingdom anyone that needs a /s should be taken out by firing squad at first light.
I would like this expanded into England please
Edit: I mean I want more 20 zones in England.
In Greater Manchester, we have 20mph zones in suburban areas and side roads with housing. I think this is sensible and safe for families, dog walkers and the elderly, who walk around the area they live. However, very few people appear to stick to the limit, as enforcement is lacking. This is the perfect place for speed cameras, to enforce the local speed limits.
Any motoring organisation that proposed speed humps should be ignored, as they clearly aren't competent. Proper road design slows drivers without needing to impede emergency services or add wear to vehicles. Adding bike lanes or planter boxes to the road center brings the desired behavior (slows drivers) with literally no negatives.
As someone who drives to and around Wales multiple times a year, it's a poorly thought out and implemented policy.
Many people speed and break the limit, particularly on main roads, and it's lack of popular support is an issue in itself.
The policy could work if the speed limits was reverted to 30mph on bigger roads but local councils and the Welsh assembly blame each other for the issues.
There is also little enforcment at present - that is changing and once people start getting fined for breaking the 20mph limit it's likely to become much more unpopular.
It could have probably been implemented successfully and with popular support with more careful designation of 30mph roads. It's a failure of politicians rather than the idea itself.
As someone who lives in Wales and drives, cycles and walks around daily, I think this is a great policy, but poorly communicated and has been a target by populist politicians which has fed into the discontent.
Many people speed and break the limit anyway regardless of the speed limit. In my experience about 80% of cars will be sticking to 20 - either abiding by the limit or stuck behind someone keeping to it. The majority of people speeding will only speed up to ~30mph, which will be less than what they'll be speeding if the limit was at 30 originally.
It may vary by council, but I personally can't think of any roads near me that could do with reverting back up to 30 (that haven't already). Some main roads will still be 20, but then there are schools and residential on these roads which doesn't make sense to revert - but some people will still complain.
Personally I don't think this policy will ever have national popular support. It is a policy that directly affects someone's day to day rather than a stat which makes it a perfect candidate for people to complain about (potholes are similar). This is despite polling also saying that the vast majority support 20 outside their own house (but outside other people's houses should be reverted?).
I am kinda sick of how much this policy is brought up. It seems like every month there is a new article critiquing the limit and it is getting quite repetitive.
It's poorly thought out because entitled cagers break the laws?
This is sadly quite common, and I think by design in many places.
Rather than long, open roads having a 30mph speed and smaller residential roads at 20, the opposite is chosen, purely because councils know that they can put speed cameras there to make some money. Making roads safer through design costs money, and many roads where accidents are common are largely ignored.
It's these tactics that feed into the hysteria that these measures are an attack on motorists. While I largely agree with the rules, many councils really take the piss. I was caught doing 24mph in a 20, but was able to overturn it because the camera was placed in the middle of a hill with a sharp enough decline to not make it legal to police.
They probably made a ton from that camera, all while the top of the hill is a small junction where people regularly crash - which is 30 and is only repaired when someone crashes into the traffic lights (not a rare occurrence).
Waah waah not killing people is slow and boring waaaaah.
Wait wiat... UK used mph over kph? Lol wtf?
Police point to a drop in road causalities
Freudian slip?
Fix: Calls made for 1500 streets to revert to 30mph.
Roads are for cars, streets are for people.
What?