this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
246 points (94.2% liked)

196

16745 readers
2793 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RangerJosie 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Butcher got bored. Had to. Nobody in a position to say no would have let this happen.

[–] RyanLiu 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe Texas is just crazy like that

[–] NegativeInf 29 points 3 months ago

Can confirm, Texas is this crazy. I have seen this in multiple meat markets in the small town I'm from.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I chose to believe this to restore my sanity.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

That sounds like a rock fact.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago
[–] Pacmanlives 9 points 3 months ago

11 out of 10 would eat reverse seared

[–] RestrictedAccount 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

$8.88?!?!

I guess it is a pound and a quarter, but still.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

maybe there's prime beef on the inside

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

how is an agglomeration of meat in the shape of a turtle offensive?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imagine you are a turtle scrolling trough Lemmy and then you stumble upon this. How would you feel?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

same way i would feel if i saw an agglomeration of meat in the shape of a person i guess:

kinda disgusted, kinda interested about the reason someone would do such a weird thing

(seeing that brings out the same feelings, but less)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I hate this, it is revolting!

"more?"

Please!

[–] Noodle07 3 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Even though I'm a vegan and I'd prefer not to see displays of dead animals, I'm not as sensitive to seeing this. Others might be. No harm in adding an NSFW tag in my books

Edit: Guess I'll just go fuck myself for stating an opinion

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not even vegan/vegetarian and I find it vaguely disturbing

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

it IS disturbing because its an agglomeration of different types of meat in the shape of a turtle

but i dont think it should be nsfw

[–] Captain_Buddha 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is it not safe for work though? Nsfw isn't "potentially offensive" tagging.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's the closest to having a "trigger warning" tag, which doesn't exist afaik. NSFW, NSFL

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the closest to a trigger warning is marking it as spoiler and saying what appears on the image in the title or description.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

eh, it happens

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

eh, it happens

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Humans are animals too. So, it's somewhat ironic that you've got a stylized exposed human skull as a profile picture.

Yes, I know it's from Diablo 2; great game!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I'll be honest, I actually hadn't thought about that before - good point

[–] ZILtoid1991 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Ah, there’s sausages with this, so could be

[–] sachamato 2 points 3 months ago

TIL that ttb exists