this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
247 points (94.6% liked)

196

16412 readers
1244 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RangerJosie 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Butcher got bored. Had to. Nobody in a position to say no would have let this happen.

[–] RyanLiu 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe Texas is just crazy like that

[–] NegativeInf 29 points 1 month ago

Can confirm, Texas is this crazy. I have seen this in multiple meat markets in the small town I'm from.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I chose to believe this to restore my sanity.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

That sounds like a rock fact.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Pacmanlives 9 points 1 month ago

11 out of 10 would eat reverse seared

[–] RestrictedAccount 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

$8.88?!?!

I guess it is a pound and a quarter, but still.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

maybe there's prime beef on the inside

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

how is an agglomeration of meat in the shape of a turtle offensive?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine you are a turtle scrolling trough Lemmy and then you stumble upon this. How would you feel?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

same way i would feel if i saw an agglomeration of meat in the shape of a person i guess:

kinda disgusted, kinda interested about the reason someone would do such a weird thing

(seeing that brings out the same feelings, but less)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I hate this, it is revolting!

"more?"

Please!

[–] Noodle07 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Even though I'm a vegan and I'd prefer not to see displays of dead animals, I'm not as sensitive to seeing this. Others might be. No harm in adding an NSFW tag in my books

Edit: Guess I'll just go fuck myself for stating an opinion

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not even vegan/vegetarian and I find it vaguely disturbing

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

it IS disturbing because its an agglomeration of different types of meat in the shape of a turtle

but i dont think it should be nsfw

[–] Captain_Buddha 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is it not safe for work though? Nsfw isn't "potentially offensive" tagging.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the closest to having a "trigger warning" tag, which doesn't exist afaik. NSFW, NSFL

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

the closest to a trigger warning is marking it as spoiler and saying what appears on the image in the title or description.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

eh, it happens

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

eh, it happens

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Humans are animals too. So, it's somewhat ironic that you've got a stylized exposed human skull as a profile picture.

Yes, I know it's from Diablo 2; great game!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'll be honest, I actually hadn't thought about that before - good point

[–] ZILtoid1991 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Ah, there’s sausages with this, so could be

[–] sachamato 2 points 1 month ago

TIL that ttb exists