Total subscribers:
🇬🇧 Let's discuss art and design!
Join us and
This community is about art in all its form, as well as its influence on culture and its application at the service of society: architecture, music, literature, performances, video games, graphic design...
You're on a francophone instance, don't be scared if you see some posts in french!
🇫🇷 Discutons d'art et de design !
Vous pouvez ici :
Le sujet de la communauté concerne toutes les formes d'art, ainsi que leur influence sur la culture et leur application au service de la société : architecture, musique, littérature, performances, jeux vidéos, design graphique...
Communautés similaires :
Pour toute question, suggestion, réclamation, etc. N'hésitez pas à utiliser le sujet épinglé.
✅ Les règles de l'instance s'appliquent bien évidemment.
Interesting website to see what you personally perceive as "blue"
Kinda wondering if you'd get different results for using a different display (especially of different technology)
This what I got from two consecutive tests anyways (weird that the percentage is different)
Your boundary is at hue 168, greener than 81% of the population. For you, turquoise is blue.
Your boundary is at hue 168, greener than 85% of the population. For you, turquoise is blue.
I got 176 on both phone and monitor.
The percentage is based on how many people have used the thing, so if it is suddenly popular and a lot more runs are completed it can shift the percentage.
The percentage is based on how many people have used the thing, so if it is suddenly popular and a lot more runs are completed it can shift the percentage.
Ohh now it makes sense, thanks
Definitely different depending on your screens. I tried it on my desktop monitor, which is fairly decently calibrated, and I got 192 (quite high - bluer than 98% of pop. at the time). It was basically impossible not to notice any hint of green tinge in the background. On my phone, I got 171 (bluer than 68% pop. at the time). I took the tests back to back.
I moved the window between my two desktop monitors just now, and my second monitor is not only older tech, but it's also not color-calibrated at all (or calibrated poorly). A lot of the greener-looking colors on my more accurate monitor looked sky blue on the other monitor.
Edit: eh... I just took it on my phone again and got 192 this time lol. It's probably because the colors close to the boundary don't fit into blue or green for me, I'd rather be able to select both/none. Being forced the choose one kinda makes it subjective to how I'm feeling about it at the time. But I know that's not really the point of this test.
Your boundary is at hue 175, bluer than 65% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.
Actually hard, because I use to distinguish Cyan from Green and Blue, so categorizing it to either blue or green was a bit difficult
Yep, for me the test felt like if someone would ask me if orange is yellow or red
Well, which is it??
If you could hurry please, I dont have much time left
Test is flawed. Does not allow for demilitarized zone between blue and green!
This leads to blueward expansion by green and a preemptive war by blue!
Turquoise is green!
Your boundary is at hue 185, bluer than 94% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.
Funny because I what I call turquoise is what I call blue. The example they gave was too green in my mind.
Your boundary is at hue 192, bluer than 98% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.
You all need to get your eyes checked
Says the blue dude
Yo, listen up, here is the story
dude you literally can't see one of those colors
30 years on the internet, never seen so many people being wrong.
Perception isn't a straightforward answer that is "right" or "wrong"
On the internet, your perception is always wrong.
My perception is right.
Hue 174 a true neutral was my description
174 for me as well.
182 for me. Apparently I am picky about my blues
Doesn't the intensity of blue fade over the life of most OLED displays? Couldn't that skew the results?
J'ai fait le test et je trouverais intéressant de le refaire en changeant la luminosité/clareté des tons. Pour les tons clairs, dans le doute je choisi bleu, mais c'est possible que je fasse pas pareil pour les tons foncés.
Ouais je pense que le calibrage de l'écran joue beaucoup aussi, sur mon pc les trois dernières couleurs étaient les mêmes à mes yeux, à cause de mon écran un peu nul
Guess my eyes are a Lil off
"Your boundary is at hue 185, bluer than 97% of the population. For you, turquoise is green."
Don't worry; this is a completely pointless test if you didn't have your monitor professionally calibrated beforehand.
Much like Eiffel 65, I appear to be blue...
This is actually the opposite, as most of these hues appear green to you.
So you are blue, da ba di da ba die, but only in specific circumstances
True neutral
Although the colors change every time so the result is different every time too
So I found that I pretty reliably get 185ish if I don’t think about it and just click. Now what happens is the test gives you a blue blue or green green, then throws you color just a bit over the line opposite of your first then throws you colors the opposite but closer to that line back and forth about every time. Seems like my picks tend to be A, B, A, B, A, B pretty consistently, which lead to the same outcomes. Not intentional choices for me, but it feels like the shock of seeing a color variance compared to the last color makes it feel like it’s “more green” or “more blue” than the previous. I feel like they should have a sort of pallet (unintentional pun) cleanser in between each color to give a true test.
Does this exist for other colors? Would be interested to see the entire spectrum done like this.
our boundary is at hue 176, bluer than 75% of the population. For you, turquoise is green.
Je distingue ce que j'appelle en français, le bleu turquoïse et le vert turquoïse. Dans mon langage, c'est là que ce trouve la frontière entre les bleus et les verts.
lol
Both my runs were higher than the average, but the second run fell about where I would probably put the line if I manually did it (182). I think it depends on the samples you get (along with your device of course). Now, let's do one where we divide things into blue, blue-green, and green. I would think the lines would be a lot similar for most people, but who knows.
Just shows that green / blue is too binary. Learn more colours
I did it twice and got 164 and 165, greener than 95%. Idk man, shit just looks blue to me.
Mine is at 185. I have red/green colorblindness. Wonder if that pushes me more to the blue side?
I got exactly 172 as well.
I wonder where they get their population distribution info
My bet is from the “submit results” button
167 here. I think the phrasing means I see a whole lotta blue
Gang gang