this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
151 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2839 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For me, the funniest part about this is that if he succeeds in getting all the courts in the nation to essentially declare that he’s legally untouchable across the board, I’m reasonably sure a lot more people are probably going to try to touch him with bullets and energetic exothermic chemical reactions.

[–] HairyHarry 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago
[–] kikutwo 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems that the party of law and order isn't so much into the law part.

[–] ThePantser 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] kmartburrito 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The party of anarchy and chaos is more fitting

[–] ThePantser 14 points 3 months ago

That actually sounds cool, let's not give them cool slogans.

The party of Weird and Creepy is more fitting.

[–] 2piradians 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Basically their argument is "we would hate for him to face consequences for his actions from two elections ago because he's, uh well, running for office again".

Fuck all the way off. Time for a spanking, bitch boy.

[–] fluxion 12 points 3 months ago

Oh shit, I might go to jail for serious crimes! Guess i better run for president of the USA again.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Another rich asshole avoiding consequences.

Epstein.

Sexual assault.

Fraud.

Insurrection.

And yet he’s walking free and running for POTUS. Again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

A list of facts

[–] Myxomatosis 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)

More whining and expectations of coddling from the career criminal.

[–] chiliedogg 11 points 3 months ago

It's worked for him so far.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump is trying to delay? For what purpose? What on earth could his strategy be here? Who can fathom what he's thinking with such a confounding move?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

If he puts it off long enough he will find a way to get even more immunity.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 5 points 3 months ago

That is one slimy dude

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 3 months ago

ABC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for ABC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-seeks-delay-upcoming-sentencing-criminal-hush-money/story?id=113262533
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support