this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
244 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

1572 readers
75 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The call spoofed Biden’s voice urging voters to stay home.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 106 points 4 months ago (2 children)

“Don’t do that again, now pay a cookie crumb for this highly illegal attempt to meddle with democracy”.

Sigh.

[–] shalafi 39 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

The government doesn't get to make up fines according to how heinous they feel the offense is. Their abilities are written in stone. This is why we see larger companies get off with a pittance, because it is a pittance to them.

A great fix would be to levy fines based on annual revenue or profit, something like that. Suddenly a violation becomes real, not merely a cost of doing business.

[–] halcyoncmdr 14 points 4 months ago

I've been saying for years that fines for these issues need to be based on revenue, not profit, and tripled. Unless they're selling their products for a 300% profit margin, they still lose money because of the bullshit. Anything else can still be justified as a cost of business.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Definitely.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

These fines have not kept up with inflation

[–] homesweethomeMrL 9 points 4 months ago

So, 50 cents.

[–] okamiueru 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious. And I ask, because US politics has normalised what would be clear corruption in most other places:

Is the illegal part here spoofing Biden, or also a private company trying to manipulate the electoral process?

If its only the former, then, what an absolute shit show.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

A bit of both, but mostly about elections. The specific act used was "Truth in Caller ID Act by maliciously spoofing the number of a prominent local political consultant."

Though, the settlements also require the company to screen calls more aggressively and implement KYC.

[–] ganksy 9 points 4 months ago

It's the B that matters not the M. Nothing will change otherwise.

[–] Stovetop 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Oh no, now we'll have to cut some (non-executive) bonuses this year and skip a few pizza parties, the horror."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Let's just cut 30 jobs to make it up within the year.

But while we're at it, might as well just round it up to cutting 600 jobs, right? Then we can still have those bonuses!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Which telecom? I tried to read the article but got greeted with a broken, non-dismissible pop up that went off about having 848 intimate partners.

[–] Reddfugee42 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Firefox + uBlock Origin

Kiwi browser + uBlock Origin on mobile

Every now and then I see the web how everyone else sees it. Jesus Christ.

[–] uranibaba 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Kiwi browser

Why not firefox for android?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Does Firefox allow extensions now in mobile?

(The answer is yes and no. Its must be an approved Firefox addon. Ublock is one of those, however all of the other scripts I use do not work in Firefox for Android. Kiwi still wins for me.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I believe that is no longer true. I just checked and it is letting me install any of the extensions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Not for my scripts, I tried it while writing the comment just to be sure. Didn't want to accidentally be wrong 😅

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

you can also have a custom extension list and put whatever on it. that's what I did before they opened it up as much as they have now.

[–] uranibaba 2 points 4 months ago

That's fair.

I like to sync my history across devices. I sometimes open a link on my phone, leave it there and then pick it up on my computer via the account sync.

[–] Agent641 5 points 4 months ago

Its like looking at a welding arc without a mask. Instant pain and recoil

[–] j0j0 4 points 4 months ago

Don't forget consent-o-matic

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

According to the article they're called Lingo Telecom. I've never heard of them (which is probably a good thing).