this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
141 points (97.3% liked)

Games

32908 readers
1291 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Didn't even see the UI. Effectively an in-game cinematic trailer.

Hope there's more forthcoming soon. Civ's gotten to a point where I have to know if there's enough to chew on in the vanilla game if I'm going to buy in early.

[–] camr_on 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's a 20 minute gameplay reveal today, this is just the trailer

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Thank you! Looking forward to it.

[–] TheBat 3 points 3 months ago

Civ 6's UI was so boring compared to 5's art deco inspired UI.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wish it didn't require a 2k account. don't need another account to play a video game.

[–] alilbee 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't. They mentioned there would be a unique skin for Napoleon if you signed up but it didn't sound required.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The steam page literally says that it requires a 3rd party account for online play (just not required for offline play). so I'm not sure if that's what you're referencing.

[–] alilbee 11 points 3 months ago

Ah, there's the catch and confusion. Not required for single player but required for multi, I guess? Not sure how others play Civ but that's not gonna affect me. I've only ever played these games solo besides a very rare duo game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Uh-oh. That's the sort of thing that would lead me not to buy it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ah, so that's why your leader now appears when you are communicating with a different civ. They had to add this for bullshit skins monetization.

Edit: I wonder if this will be moddable: I now wanna see Master Chief teabagging Cleopatra when I declare war

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why would you need an account to play a single player, non cloud hosted game?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shitty publisher mandated launchers.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 2 points 3 months ago

Good, I wonder if they removed it for Xcom 2 yet. I haven't played that since they sideloaded that crap into my steam install.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Didn't they announce that there would not be a launcher? Also removed for Civ VI.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I look forward to maybe buying this in 5-10 years when it's on sale with dlc for a reasonable price.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I look forward to buying this day one and playing it for 5-10 years and then buying the DLC when it's on sale for a reasonable price.

[–] trolololol 4 points 3 months ago

I look forward to playing it in 10 years when I get a computer with the minimum requirements for a payable price

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

My first impressions:

  • I like the art style, I'll have to see about the leaders.
  • Gwendolyn Christie is a really good choice for the narrator.
  • I don't like the sound of there only being three ages, but maybe there's more to it.
  • Also not sure about switching civs mid-game, but being able to do things like a French Cleopatra might be fun.
  • Are they going to restrict this to avoid potentially offensive combos, especially in multiplayer? I'm thinking of things like using real-world colonizers for leaders of places they occupied (like an English ruler in charge of India and stuff like that.) At the very least it seems like they're inviting trouble unnecessarily.
  • The prices are completely bonkers, nearly $170 CAD for the Founders Edition! This is gonna be the first Civ game in a long time that I don't pick up on launch day.
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't civ a game about colonisation? If the stuff you described is offending to some, the whole game already is to them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

No, you're thinking about Sid Meier's Colonization

[–] TheBat 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  • I don't like the sound of there only being three ages, but maybe there's more to it.

I thought the same thing. I'm guessing more will be added via DLC?

Which is a scummy move tbh

[–] Jyrdano 2 points 3 months ago

From what I’ve heard, the ages are going to be much longer and more game-changing that Civ 6 eras. Like age of exploration unlocking new parts of the world and new era appropriate civs to play with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I would bet that there will be a new space age era added on as a DLC

The ages concern me most though - what progress carries across? Are you going to be going full land grab because your infrastructure resets etc?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Civ 2 is still peak for me, although I did like Leonard Nimoy's contribution to Civ IV.

[–] Wogi 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The best civ is always your first.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

In that case it should be the original on the Amiga 500 😄, but I still prefer the improvements in Civ 2.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think that's true for everything but civ 2. It seems like everyone agrees 2 is just better

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

2 was primitive, but designed in a way that allowed much more freedom than later versions.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still play civ v with a few friends pretty much weekly. A couple times a year one of our wives and kids go out of town and we lan party from 4pm to 6am and actually finish a game!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

That's awesome!

[–] ripcord 4 points 3 months ago

IV for me. Plus that theme song....it's possibly my favorite from any song ever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Give me more soldiers noble leader!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This looks like the live stream of the gameplay reveal, starting now:

https://www.twitch.tv/firaxisgames

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Highlights as I remember them from the live stream:

  • Play progresses through 3 ages: Antiquity, Exploration, Modern
  • Continue as a different civ when starting each new age
  • Map expands with each new age
  • Leader choice is separate from civ choice
  • Districts
  • Christopher Tin soundtrack
  • Gwendoline Christie narration
  • February 2025 release

Edit: Here's the rerun:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc3_EO6Bj2M&t=5406s

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Also noted :

  • Navigable rivers
  • terrain has cliffs
  • armies seems to be condensed, with generals leading them. Fighting looks to be constant in some way? (or that's just the render for the trailer)
  • cities seem to expand much more
  • the leaders looks to have some stats which can be improved
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Sounds similar to Humankind. Which is nice cus I like that game.

[–] TheBat 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
  • Play progresses through 3 ages: Antiquity, Exploration, Modern

Anyone want to bet there would be more ages after DLCs are released?

I'm guessing Industrial and Information ages added before and after Modern age, respectively.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Also a possibility of a humankind style neolithic era?

But yes, expecting some required DLC unfortunately.

But civ is a patient gamer staple - just wait for 8 to come out and 7's dlcs will be cheap! 🤣

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Interested how the map expansion will work in multiplayer.

Concerned about the era resets.

I like what they appear to have taken from humankind (eras, leader swaps, outposts/yowns, map elevation?) and old world (tile improvements culture bomb)

Also concerned about how the maps seemed to just be cities, no gradual domestication of the world with farms, mines etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm a bit torn. On one hand it seems like a step back from the Civ 6 cartoon garbage. On the other hand the ground textures still look like blurry paint vomit. It's kinda weird because the foliage and mountains / rocks seem to be in a higher resolution and much more detailed. I guess it might be WIP and a remnant from Civ 6. The unit sizes also seem gargantuan? I guess that part would not be as hard to fix via mods but that was already a compatibility nightmare before, especially when the mod authors quit.

So, graphically it might be a buyable Civ game again, but... Picking a new civ or mismatching leaders makes me worry though, because that sounds awfully familiar to another game that had a similar terrible feature. The Aztecs turning into France while being led by some Japanese dude just does not feel right.

The FOMO unlocks to bait you into signing up AND buying the cartoon shit are a hard pass for me though. Selling that as a "thank you" is nothing but insolent.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

TIL some people play Civ games for the graphics.

[–] jorp 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not graphics, art style. It's a valid critique and not snobbery.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh ffs what is it with people thinking it looks like a cartoon. As for scale, that's every 4x game.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Are you seriously claiming Civ 6 does not have a cartoon art style..? And no, Civ V had a much better unit scale & diversity, especially with certain mods.

[–] Visstix 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From what I saw of the gameplay is that civilizations are sorta locked on a path, but you get a choice of similar civilisations. Unless you play in the style of a different civ and unlock certain milestones you could unlock other paths. At least from what I understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they took features from humankind and added them in for some reason

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I like Humankind.

I like the civ switch since you can change you priorities each age. Also I like having a leader I actually like with a civ I like.

Let's me do what I want to do the entire campaign instead of having to be stick with some stuff I don't like just to play with the things I do like.

I'm terrible at these games so I can't speak to balance and strategy and stuff. I use lots of auto stuff or relying on suggested choices from advisors lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›