this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
538 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19244 readers
3104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dezmd 16 points 4 months ago

They're really trying to couch the narrative.

[–] voldage 14 points 4 months ago

They could have memed it to hell and back with stuff like "I did not have a sexual relationship with that furniture mr. Clinton" or "only inanimate thing im horny for is democracy" but they had to go full serious damage control mode. Like, if they told us there are no aliens invading and put soldiers in the streets we would look out for ufos. What did they think they were going to gain by that kind of response? Completely detached from the ether, they are.

[–] Snapz 14 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

If you're not gonna talk about it, just don't talk about it. This counts as talking about it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

He still hasn't denied it!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

Streisand'd the narrative wonderfully

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I don't blame them. You don't want Vance to lose his concentration and start fantasizing about couches.

[–] paddirn 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What happens in the couch, stays in the couch. But hey, loveseats got that name for a reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustZ 11 points 4 months ago

A lot of people are talking about couches and other sexy furniture.

[–] Sarmyth 11 points 4 months ago

They don't kiss and tell! /wink

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Don't wanna discuss it huh? So you've got something to hide about it?

[–] Snapz 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"..because now we fucking LOVE SEATS, y'all!!!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 58008 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I heard he has a secret nest of tables with his mistress.

[–] Etterra 6 points 4 months ago

How dare you talk about his ottomans that way!

[–] demizerone 7 points 4 months ago

The pig fucker strategy happened by accident for the Democrats. Thanks goodness for the tik tokr that started that. When Walz cracked that joke in his first speech as VP candidate it clearly upset Vance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

To the tune of “We don’t talk about Bruno”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

This is just too much. Ha ha ha.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Not evading the couch allegations.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Technically, they’re talking about it!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›