this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
331 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4367 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluxion 69 points 4 months ago

I love that line. It's gonna drive Trump nuts because he'll sound like a little weasel every time he opens his mouth to trash talk Kamala and he knows it, but if he debates he'll also look like a lying weasel 🤔

[–] FuglyDuck 55 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We are one step closer to witnessing a presidential candidate kick another presidential candidate in the balls for being a pig, during a live debate.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 4 months ago (1 children)

With the amount of damage she could do to the Republican election chances in a fair debate, by the time she's done with them they'll wish she just kicked them in the nards instead

[–] FuglyDuck 23 points 4 months ago

So… I’ll settle for at the end of the debate?

Please?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then all his worshippers will wear a crotch bandage in solidarity

[–] aseriesoftubes 9 points 4 months ago

Does the crotch bandage go inside the adult diaper or outside it?

[–] AlternatePersonMan 50 points 4 months ago

Just say "I get better ratings than you anyway, tiny hands."

Done

[–] Nuke_the_whales 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

She should keep calling him out like it's WrestleMania till he snaps. "What's the matter toadstool dick? You afraid to debate this Queen? Put down the big Mac and pick up your balls old man"

[–] BeMoreCareful 5 points 4 months ago

Snap into a slimjim™️

[–] melisdrawing 4 points 4 months ago

Oh I love this idea so much. Can we get some luchadores just chilling behind her at one of these press events?

[–] psycho_driver 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's lately become afraid of prosecutors. That's why he keeps going after Biden, instead of who he's running against.

[–] BeMoreCareful 4 points 4 months ago

Nah, he did that with Clinton and Obama. I think he just forgets.

[–] Rapidcreek 6 points 4 months ago

I'm sure many a ketchup bottle died due to that line.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

CNBC Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

CNBC is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnbc/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Credibility: High Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual

IMO it would be better to highlight factuality over credibility in the .