this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
895 points (98.0% liked)

Housing Bubble 2: Return of the Ugly

330 readers
771 users here now

A community for discussing and documenting the second great housing bubble.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
895
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by SeattleRain to c/housing_bubble_2
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72 97 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You don't have kids because it's too expensive.

I don't have kids because I'm immature, irresponsible, would screw it up like everything else in my life, can't even take care of myself let alone another human, these genes aren't worth passing on, climate change will almost certainly never be taken as seriously as it should be, and it's not like there's anyone that would want to have my kids anyway.

We are not the same.

And also it's too expensive.

[–] JustAnotherRando 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't have kids because I find fulfillment in life without them. I get to travel, spend time on hobbies, and have a social life. I know you can technically do those things while having kids, but generally not to the same degree.
Also, I think letting our population decline a bit is probably better for our species and our planet.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 13 points 4 months ago

I get to travel, spend time on hobbies, and have a social life.

I have kids, travel, hobby, and have a social life. Introducing kids to new places, ideas, and people has given me a new perspective on them and made these activities more fun.

Also, I think letting our population decline a bit is probably better for our species and our planet.

The biggest waste producers on our planet aren't the areas with the most people. They're the areas with the access to the most money and the least political consequence.

The OpenAI project is a great example of this. Phenomenal consumption of domestic resources - land, minerals, energy, water - at the hands of a few thousand people. If everyone in Brazil stopped existing tomorrow, Sam Altman would still be pumping out huge plumes of CO2 and sucking up hectares of water to cool his data centers.

Similarly, the assorted wars in Europe and the Middle East - Russia/Ukraine, Israel's genocide in Palestine, the US/Afghanistan and US/Iraq missions - have been resource hogs that vastly outstripped anything a comparable number of civilians would have consumed.

Idk what the "correct" number of humans is, but the notion that we can end the ecological degradation if the population gets cut in half really underweight the biggest drivers of the harm.

[–] FlashMobOfOne 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I grew up in a family with over a dozen siblings.

I didn't have space to myself nor a quiet Saturday morning until I was 21 years old, and I did a shit-ton of parenting without my consent.

Kids suck. Childrearing sucks. My dogs are nicer, cleaner, more loving, and cuter than human children. You couldn't pay men enough to give up my quiet, clean condo on a Saturday morning.

Also it's too expensive.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Who cares, let population decline for a generation or so. Maybe we will stop producing so much shit and scale back

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 23 points 4 months ago (5 children)

let population decline for a generation or so

But that's bad for the Big GDP Number

[–] HappycamperNZ 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Not necessarily - less people means lower unemployment resulting in higher wages to attract people to your organization (income is directly linked to GDP). Phillips curve relationship.

Its a bitch for inflation though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh no, not the economy!

Anyways...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pyre 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

that's not how capitalism works. if you're not selling enough shit you find a way to make the same people buy more or pay more. line must go up. no scaling back. line must go up.

[–] Dkarma 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But, now hear me out...what if it doesn't..

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand... Are you saying, line go down? I've never heard of such a thing

[–] HappycamperNZ 8 points 4 months ago

You've never seen my bank account ....

[–] pyre 10 points 4 months ago

hahaha... haha... ok now that we laughed at that ridiculously absurd idea, let's watch the line go up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paddirn 54 points 4 months ago

Make it so that families can afford to have one parent stay at home all day while the other parent does some basic shit off of a high school education for a job they just walked in off the street for.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (15 children)

Maybe you can solve the problem by letting immigrants in

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Our leaders wouldn't mind that except that immigrants might come from countries where they grew up with access to banned books...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 46 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Government in the 1940s: "Here, we're demolishing black and rural neighborhoods to give returning veterans a cheap suburban housing stock. Also, we're doing big industrial jobs programs and ramping up our domestic manufacturing base."

Baby Boom Happens

Government in 2020s: "Here, we're larding you up with debt all through your twenties and turning every facet of life into a micro payment we can ratchet upwards on a whim."

Baby Bust Happens

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hmm, will Gen Z become known as the Busters?

I kinda like that

[–] Deftdrummer 8 points 4 months ago

Already known as the roommate generation.

[–] SlopppyEngineer 46 points 4 months ago

After a century of telling people work, career, consumption and wealth are the most important thing in their life, business leaders are now shocked people will prioritize work, career, consumption and wealth over having many children.

Furthermore, after cutting programs for making child care, health care and education affordable, politicians are wondering why people don't bring as much children into the world that need a lot of health care, child care and education.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There was a time when a man with a highschool education could work a single full-time job to buy a house and support a stay at home partner and 2 children. Bring that back and you'll probably get more babies.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen 41 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Now you know why the corporate backers of Republicans want to use their platform to outlaw abortion and birth control.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

Reminds me of the CEO who took a giant paycut so everyone in his company can earn 70k/yr minimum. Guess what some of his employees started doing. They started to have kids.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

People like him should be the norm, not an anomaly. In a system in full support of greed, only the greedy are meant to thrive unfortunately.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

GOP: "that's okay, just trap them to have children and make abortion illegal."

Remember JD Vance said that childless individuals "should not have as much of a voice."

[–] Nuke_the_whales 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People who fuck couches should have less of a voice

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa 34 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Where can I get some of that $1200 rent that isn’t in the middle of some hillbilly backwater?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ignoring the elephant in the room called "Child Care." Often that's more expensive than housing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iarwain 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

When did we go from “baby boom” to “this is the correct population level we should sustain”. A boom eventually gets a correction

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

when it became clear that the people who "weren’t having enough kids" were white, it’s been white supremacy this whole time

[–] iAvicenna 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

jokes on billionaires, because of your shitty greed there wont be anyone left to buy your worthless junk

[–] HeyJoe 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

They will be long dead before any of this matters, so I doubt they will care.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Dang millennials! They must be the most powerful generation in... generations! Is there anything them avocado toasters can't ruin?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The baby boom generation is dying off and you're supposed to replace that?

Who writes these articles? Do they even think? Do they pause for one moment to think?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AI. AI writes these articles.

The I stands for 'Incompetence'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

$1500? That's mad cheap. A small 2 bedroom in my city goes for $2500 or so

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

Republicans: the solution is fascism!

[–] Mango 12 points 4 months ago

Life fucked me up. I'm not giving it fresh sacrifices.

[–] Thcdenton 12 points 4 months ago

Ohhh we're causing it. Ok cool.

load more comments
view more: next ›