AnxiousOtter

joined 2 years ago
[–] AnxiousOtter 4 points 4 weeks ago

Nice, good reference.

[–] AnxiousOtter 18 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] AnxiousOtter 1 points 1 month ago

That sounds delicious.

[–] AnxiousOtter 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's clear you're a misogynistic incel that thinks you deserve access to a woman's body against her will :). Thanks for the self report.

[–] AnxiousOtter 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nobody is prejudging anyone. It's risk mitigation. I don't lock my doors at night because I'm prejudiced or bigoted towards my neighbors. I lock them because there's a non zero statistical chance that someone might try to break in. Do you not understand what risk management means? Then you need to look up what the definitions of those words mean.

[–] AnxiousOtter 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Rofl, can you point to the prejudice and/or bigotry? Nobody is suggesting we deny service to men, remove men's civil rights, or do literally anything to men. All your rights and liberties are fully intact. Women being cautious, scared and wary of men because they fear for their safety is not bigotry, prejudice, or sexism. It's a rational and direct response to society's complete and utter failure to protect them, and even further, society's active efforts to protect the rapists and punish the victims.

We're all in here talking about protecting women in a world where way too many people think rape is perfectly acceptable, and you're in the back shouting "but how do we protect the men!?" and you genuinely don't see a problem with that. Jesus Christ. Men are protected, it's women who are vulnerable.

[–] AnxiousOtter 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I already made my point? Society at large doesn't take sexual assault seriously, as evidenced by many factors such as lack of police response, hostile judicial systems, health insurance companies not covering rape kits, the existence of manosphere pieces of shit like the Tates, America recently electing an adjudicated rapist to the highest office of the country, the misogynistic teachings of all major religions, the misogynistic practices of all right-wing political ideologies, etc... Women face a harsh reality where they're forced to protect themselves.

Even here, in a post about a woman raped by over fifty men hundreds of times, you're shrieking "BuT WhUt AbOuT MEnS FeEliNgS".

So, what exactly is your point? Women should just swallow all of these fears and concerns? Why? To spare men any sort of introspection and emotional discomfort? Just deal with it ladies, you're gonna get raped, big deal.

[–] AnxiousOtter 2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I'll take your pivot to a well known misleading and unrelated statistic with no comparable qualities aside from both being a statistic as admittance that you have no counter-argument.

Not surprised.

[–] AnxiousOtter -1 points 1 month ago (13 children)

What an absurdly bad faith argument to make. I assume you're trying to get me to write several paragraphs explaining why it's so damn stupid just so you can reply with a one word gatcha or something.

Anyways, eat shit incel.

[–] AnxiousOtter 2 points 1 month ago (16 children)

1 in 5 women in the US are raped at some point in their lives. It's not misandry to avoid men when there's a 20% chance you'll be raped. That's just good sense.

Unhappy with that? Work to create a safer society for women, instead of trolling a post about a woman who was raped hundreds of times by fifty different men.

[–] AnxiousOtter 6 points 1 month ago (18 children)

You're in a thread about a woman who was raped by over 50 different men, and all you're concerned with is "WhAt AbOuT tHe MeN!?!?!".

Crawl out of your own asshole please.

[–] AnxiousOtter 4 points 1 month ago

Ya. I'm a man and I'd also 100% choose the bear.

view more: next ›