this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
306 points (99.4% liked)

Ukraine

8033 readers
1094 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

To be more precise, fuck the current Russian government. Its not like all Russians are evil, they just happen to be born in a country with oppressive governments for the past... 2000 years or so?

[–] Crampon 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you seen russian first aid? (Nsfl)

Russians are, lets say unique. Always has been. There are attitudes in the Russian population that are cultural conflicting with peaceful societies. Dont excuse this campaign by blaming it on one individual. He has support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, past 1800 AD or so they were all degrees of shit everywhere agriculturalised. I don't have any reason to expect Feodor I was noticeably worse than Elizabeth I.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Serfdom proves otherwise, but it's not like it was a whole different ballgame.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Hmm. It had mostly died out in England by her time, apparently, which is interesting. It wasn't formally abolished until 1925, but obviously was in practice.

Elizabeth was the first pre-modern English monarch I thought of, but she was also one of the most repressive from what I've heard. She was also the first to adopt a policy of genocidal brutality in Ireland. Feodor... was apparently sickly and possibly intellectually disabled. I wonder if life was easier or harder at the time than it had been under the princes.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Damn 32 F-16s could fuck some shit up, godspeed guys, godspeed.

[–] NOT_RICK 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ukraine has stated they need 150-200 of them and I believe this commitment plus those from Denmark and the Netherlands will get them near 100.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

200? do they plan to no-fly-zone the whole of Russia?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can only carry a few missiles at a time, ukraine is huge, and some will inevitably get shot down.

200 sounds about right.

[–] NOT_RICK 8 points 1 month ago

Factor in service rotations too and it makes even more sense

[–] Dremor 9 points 1 month ago

Not all of them will fly at the same time.
Some will be unavailable for various repairs, some will be too far from the interception target to get in time, some will inevitably destroyed from time to time. 200 isn't that far fetched.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There are some small concerns about parking to contend with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Will they be able to get 3 working ones from these wrecks though? If they were in good condition, they'd still be using them.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If they've already had their most advanced pieces of hardware pulled out, its doubtful. Nevermind finding someone to actually pilot the damned things.

What Ukraine needs more than anything right now is more young professionals capable of operating the hardware of war. What they're getting is a military garage sale.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

If nothing else, these can parts and trainers . That's pretty important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Eh. They have range issues IIRC. They'll mostly be good for interception.