this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
292 points (99.3% liked)

Excellent Reads

1566 readers
74 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

God, this article was full of lines that just made me want to cry.

This past Christmas Day was the 30th anniversary of the public execution by firing squad of Romania’s last Communist dictator, Nicolae Ceaușescu, who’d ruled for 24 years. In 1990, the outside world discovered his network of “child gulags,” in which an estimated 170,000 abandoned infants, children, and teens were being raised. Believing that a larger population would beef up Romania’s economy, Ceaușescu had curtailed contraception and abortion, imposed tax penalties on people who were childless, and celebrated as “heroine mothers” women who gave birth to 10 or more. Parents who couldn’t possibly handle another baby might call their new arrival “Ceauşescu’s child,” as in “Let him raise it.”

To house a generation of unwanted or unaffordable children, Ceauşescu ordered the construction or conversion of hundreds of structures around the country. Signs displayed the slogan: the state can take better care of your child than you can.

At age 3, abandoned children were sorted. Future workers would get clothes, shoes, food, and some schooling in Case de copii—“children’s homes”—while “deficient” children wouldn’t get much of anything in their Cămine Spitale. The Soviet “science of defectology” viewed disabilities in infants as intrinsic and uncurable. Even children with treatable issues—perhaps they were cross-eyed or anemic, or had a cleft lip—were classified as “unsalvageable.”

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Everyone read this. It's an incredibly well written article. Journalism like this is so rare.

Jesus fucking christ. This has hit me like a ton of bricks. And this is all so recent. What a stupid bubble I've grown up in. Glad to be edified, but mortified at humans, as well as totally inspired by them. Izidor and all of the other suffering people out there put me to shame. What a dumb thing to complain about work today.

Wishing that peace finds all those who have suffered at the hands of monstrous humans.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What a dumb thing to complain about work today.

Trauma is trauma. This isn't the Olympics, and we do not judge and compare trauma.

YOU'RE ALLOWED TO FEEL SAD or pissed or frustrated or hungry or lonely or happy. The existence of people more happy or lonely or hungry or sad than you does not rob you of your right to feel.

Don't minimize your own experiences. They're the only ones you get.

I hope tomorrow goes better. No more free slurpees tomorrow, but it is Friday.

[–] TargaryenTKE 3 points 5 months ago

They're the only ones you get

Ha, jokes on you, that's what TV and books are for! (Mostly kidding, but not completely)

[–] captainlezbian 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah I’ve been having to remind myself of this as I (diagnosed with ptsd) have been hanging out a lot with someone whose life is an unyielding horror show. It’s important to be sensitive and acknowledge the differences with her, but it’s also important to understand that my life has been pretty fucking rough in its own right.

And both of us manage to complain about a bad day at work. Sure her night terrors aren’t about her bad day at work, and none of her shifts have resulted in one of her traumatically originated mental illnesses, but I still get a text bitching about it from her when it happens.

[–] HerderHilton 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Highly recommend subscribing to The Atlantic. It’s about $50 for a year but has some of the best journalism across a variety of perspectives that will challenge you. Sometimes emotionally, like with this article, other times politically, but I always come away feeling more informed.

[–] Dasus 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Well, you make a good case.

Have you read this from them?

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1996/05/the-nitrous-oxide-philosopher/376581/

(I can't, I'm not a subscriber. But I think it used to be free or smth. I'm pretty sure I've read it in the past.)

[–] [email protected] 70 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ceaușescu had curtailed contraception and abortion, imposed tax penalties on people who were childless

He was an incompetant monster and damn that's an exemplary case.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, it gets better. The Romanian government couldn't feed all the orphans because his dumbass tried to turn a bread basket with significant oil reserves into an industrial powerhouse (so he could have more guns), burning a lot of the oil that the economy relied on to pay for services to do it, so he came up with the bright idea of just giving them micro blood transfusions.

Of untested blood. With often unsterilized needles. Up to 120 times in a month.

During the AIDs epidemic.

They kind of mention this but the author didn't seem to realize it was actually supposed to be a replacement for food instead of a medical procedure.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

where the fuck did they get all that blood --

romania

oooooh

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah they had some leftover from the vampire times.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We may soon see this in Russia, where they’re talking about banning the idea of not having children as “extremism”

[–] [email protected] 71 points 5 months ago (2 children)

We might even see something like it in the USA, thanks to the evangelicals and Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] SkyezOpen 5 points 5 months ago

Broke teen parents having no choice but to join the military? That's a republican wet dream.

On the plus side, they were smart enough to go air force.

[–] Delusional 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With them, I imagine the US will become more like Israel. They're religious extremists.

[–] Anticorp 4 points 5 months ago

They're not following the teachings of Jesus though. What they are is some nationalistic spin-off that doesn't have much in common with actual Christianity.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Russia’s system isn’t/wasn’t any better, unfortunately. This was incredibly brutal and so hard to read.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The funny thing is the Soviets actually warned him about literally everything. He wouldn't listen, and Romania had enough independence to ignore them.

The Soviets made some huge unforced errors, but never "feed the orphans blood transfusions" errors.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds 4 points 5 months ago

What reading that last line felt like 😅😂

[–] Mango 13 points 5 months ago

All of this is basically my worst nightmare. Fuck anyone imposing the way this guy did.

-antinatalist

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Truly the most horrific of crimes against children. Nothing makes me more sick.

[–] LesserAbe 7 points 5 months ago

An important story.