this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
814 points (85.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36107 readers
1177 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

300 million lbs of fireworks and 2.7 billion dollars gone in a cloud of smoke.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

No, fireworks are cool and fun and people enjoy them.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I absolutely hate them. Birds die because of them, and they terrify my dog.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Personally I hate them and I think they are more harm than good.

Let's do some clarification: I can appreciate the high in the sky fireworks, while I simply hate those you fire by hand in between the legs of other bystanders.

Overall I think they are dangerous and should not be freely sold, while keep doing the big ones in the sky.

But, honestly, a form of art that harms so many people and animals maybe should be banned after all.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

For pollution, at least CO2, 300M lb is 136k metric tons. I didn't know the water to CO2 ratio for solid rocket motors, but I'd guess maybe half is CO2. Cars produce 1.5B tons of CO2 per year in the US, so the CO2 would be about equivalent to about 24 min of driving cars. That doesn't seem too unreasonable.

But maybe you were taking about the metals? I don't know how much of an issue those are.

[–] someguy3 8 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Unfortunately this isn't complete combustion. There's a shit ton of PM and everything else. Ever go to a big show? They have to take pauses for the smoke to clear so that you can see the next batch.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jimmy90 11 points 5 months ago

no i think they are beautiful

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (29 children)

The art of it has use. However I think drone shows would be an interesting replacement.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

So many injuries and fires every year, aside from all the noise and pollution. My friend’s house (old farm) burned down because a firework landed on the roof :(

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Does anyone else feel like adding salt to food is a complete waste of money?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BigBenis 10 points 5 months ago

They also cause fires, severely injure and kill people, trigger people with PTSD, frighten animals and disrupt local wildlife.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago

Fireworks are art. Art isn't inherently wasteful.

[–] Marthirial 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

As someone who grew up in a country where fireworks are legal and used on every festivity, they suck if you are a baby, a dog or not the one lighting the up.

[–] NutWrench 9 points 5 months ago

If it weren't for fireworks, we wouldn't have funny stories about dumb people shoving them in their ass cracks, setting them on fire and cauterizing their buttocks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Bread and circus, boys, bread and circus.

[–] Resonosity 8 points 5 months ago

Yes, I wholeheartedly think this

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree that they've moved into the territory of mostly annoying, but getting rid of the fireworks is unlikely to reduce the cost of celebrations. they'll just be replaced with equally expensive drone shows and the like

[–] kaffiene 7 points 5 months ago

less environmentally damaging and less harmful to wildlife. Sounds like a great idea

[–] Feathercrown 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Several other people feel this way and you're all wrong. Is good food wasted because after you eat it it's gone? Are vacations stupid because once it's over nothing has materially changed? No? So why are fireworks pointless simply because they're temporary?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Boozilla 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They seem very backwards when there are drone displays and other forms of entertainment. Humans cling on to things way too long.

[–] ChexMax 7 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I think a big part of it is that they're dangerous. It's fun to experience just a tinge of fear from how big they sound, or even just from being near the little street versions. It's a (relatively) safe way for us to experience something that would otherwise be terror inducing explosives.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I'm not totally against fireworks. As others have mentioned, sometimes we do need to just have some fun and not worry about the consequences. But they should be done far from residential area, so that unwilling people (e.g. vets, children, or pets) aren't disturbed. (Honestly though, I wish we didn't have any vets with PTSD, that's the worse problem. As long as we still have wars, I'd say let the people have some fun.)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›