this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
538 points (99.8% liked)

196

15665 readers
2638 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TotallynotJessica 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is the peak of evolution. It's been downhill ever since.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Hard agree.

Some evil cabal intolerant to vast variety of species orchestrated mass extinction so that now we are all this uniform fish-bird things.

I want to go back.

[–] bamfic 5 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 86 points 4 days ago

The spore period

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago

They managed to procreate successfully. Can you say the same about yourself?

[–] Zachariah 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zachariah 8 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Fun fact, prior to the Cambrian explosion animals did not have hard parts. There is a theory in a book called "in the blink of an eye " that some animal evolved eyes followed quickly by the evolution hard parts and the Cambrian explosion. They're were three phyla of animals before the Cambrian explosion and whatever the current number is now I think it's like 28 after the Cambrian explosion which took place in a very short period of time. link to book edited comment to have better search

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Your “link to the book” seems to be a link to a search from that title with a billion results that aren’t the book you’ve described.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those are images made from the data recovered from their fossils. I guess they didn't look like that at all. If the same process was done with human skeletons we'd have a very good laugh.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those are trilobites, part of the arthropod phylum. They have exoskeletons (i.e no inner bones), so they would probably look quite a lot like their fossils. Comparing them to vertebrates like humans (or dinosaurs, or whatever) in this context makes no sense.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And an exoskeleton can't have anything covering it because... ?

[–] WoahWoah 15 points 3 days ago

Because that's what the "exo" part means.

[–] niktemadur 7 points 3 days ago

Go home, evolution, you're drunk... or tripping balls on a heroic dose, sounds more like it.

[–] militaryintelligence 1 points 2 days ago

It's not a phase mom this is who I am

[–] unreachable 5 points 4 days ago