this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
263 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1865 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Crazy how it took the FBI 3 years to find a guy with distinct face tattoos.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

some criminals are aided by the fact that they're so ass-ugly, nobody can stand to look at them for long enough to recognize them from a wanted poster. just a split-second to notice that everything above the neck looks like an exploded baby's diaper, and you're staring at the floor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Came here to say the same.

The FBI affidavit in Knight's Jan. 6 case says he has "several distinctive tattoos, including one under his left eye ... and what appears to be the emblem of the Cadillac car company on his neck."

But, then again, people often mistake the Honda Civic tattoo on my neck for other cars, so it must be rough ruling us out.

(I have no tattoos on my neck. Learn to internet.)

[–] Theprogressivist 22 points 7 months ago

Delicious schadenfreude.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Well that’s an unfortunately worded headline. “dreaded” as in the noun, of having dreadlocks. Not “dreaded” as in the adjective, regarded with great fear. Although this does spark an interesting thought. Apparently dreadlocks originated from the English invaders in the colonial world, as they encountered native tribes with “dreadful” hair.

[–] Everythingispenguins 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah I read it that way first too.

[–] suction 2 points 7 months ago

It's just NBC News, who cares if their headlines are unwieldy and cumbersome /s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Another one about to find out

[–] CharlesDarwin 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Why does it take so long to find these clowns? Just imagine if they were left wing...

[–] shalafi 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The sedition hunters have been after them for 3 years. You saying they're also right-wingers who don't show enough interest?

The FBI launched the largest investigation in their history. Think they're holding back?

FFS, they found him in South Dakota. There's 343 people farming corn and tending, uh, whatever animals they can grow in that wasteland.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 7 months ago

I applaud them for tracking them down. I just wonder if these terrorists had been left of center (or were Muslim, or POC) if they would have been permitted to make all their plans out in the open for months in advance, then carry them out, then scamper off with no one detaining them...

But because they are who they are, this was allowed to fester and be planned - again, OSINT definitely saw all this - and no extra security was done, and none called in during, and it seems like they get slaps on the wrist when they are tracked down.

It's all very suspect, yes.

[–] MojoMcJojo 2 points 7 months ago

I thought that too, but then if someone gave me a picture of a random face it might take me a while to find them, especially if they don't have a publicly facing social media account with their face all over it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — A Jan. 6 participant whose dreaded blonde locks and face tattoos made him a memorable face in the pro-Trump mob has been arrested in South Dakota, the FBI said, accusing him of shoving an officer during the Capitol melee after "ramming" a giant metal-framed “TRUMP” sign into a line of police officers.

Footage compiled by "sedition hunters" who have aided the FBI in hundreds of cases against Capitol rioters shows the man identified as Knight was one of the first people to breach the initial barriers at the Capitol and shows him ripping away police barricades as the mob confronted officers.

Video shows the same man aggressively confronting law enforcement, at one point rushing towards the police line with an extended flag pole and then smashing it on the concrete in front of officers.

That man was initially dubbed "Dreaded Proud Boy" by online sleuths due to his hairstyle and proximity to members of the far-right organization during the initial breach of the Capitol grounds, but federal prosecutors did not present any evidence to connect Knight to the organization.

Footage from before the Capitol attack also shows the man identified as Knight banging on glass near the Washington Monument after officers took another man into custody near the Trump rally on the Ellipse, where the election-denying former president told the mob to "fight like hell" or they wouldn't have a country anymore.

The FBI affidavit in Knight's Jan. 6 case says he has "several distinctive tattoos, including one under his left eye ... and what appears to be the emblem of the Cadillac car company on his neck."


The original article contains 620 words, the summary contains 270 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Everythingispenguins 2 points 7 months ago

I don't know that Trump had the white rasta vote. /s