this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
257 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19229 readers
3422 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon 41 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Someone at the justice department just found out how expensive seats at a Taylor Swift concert are, didn't they?

[–] Badeendje 12 points 7 months ago

Or they finally watched the last week tonight episode on this monopoly.

[–] SpaghettiYeti 1 points 6 months ago

Literally over a thousand in Boston

[–] Addv4 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Justice dept also clarified in the same press release that, "Water is wet" and the sky is still currently blue.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Water also destroys magnets! Get them wet, BOOM, no more magnet! /s

[–] orclev 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

While I totally agree with you, fun semantic question, is water wet, or does it only make other things wet?

[–] unreasonabro 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

idk about you but when I get in the tub, I don't get wet. The water gets unreasonabroed.

[–] SpaceNoodle 7 points 6 months ago

Particle Man

[–] EmpathicVagrant 2 points 6 months ago

Water is wet The concept of wet is embodied by water, but doesn’t get wet, itself.

[–] SpaceNoodle 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] orclev 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So the crux of it is the definition of wet. A couple definitions: "covered or soaked with a liquid such as water" or "Not yet dry or firm". While you could maybe argue water is "not yet dry", that also implies the expectation that it will at some point be which it won't, because if it's "dry" it's not water anymore. Similarly water is not "covered or soaked in a liquid" as it is a liquid. It's a subtle point but highlights a quirk of English. A liquid almost by definition can't be "wet" unless it also has a dry state (E.G. paint).

[–] SpaceNoodle 0 points 6 months ago

Water is covered in water.

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They've only been letting them get away with it for over 20 years...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 11 points 7 months ago

Yes but ticketmaster has been a menace for far longer and this could have been avoided by regulating them pre merger and not allowing them to become the monster they are. It's like Clear Channel, the government is letting these companies run wild.

[–] Gingerlegs 16 points 7 months ago

Wow, about 35 years late on that one eh

[–] LordCrom 5 points 7 months ago

File this one under "No shit, Sherlock"

[–] unreasonabro 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

oh you noticed, like twenty years later

maybe if we're lucky in another twenty years you'll notice what the capitalists have been doing

farcical motherfuckers

[–] EmpathicVagrant 1 points 6 months ago

That takes about seventy years plus bloodshed and the history about it being whitewashed so it doesn’t seem that bad and someone else does it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, was being brought with 30 state and district attorneys general and seeks to break up the monopoly they say is squeezing out smaller promoters and hurting artists.

The Justice Department says Live Nation also threatened to retaliate against one firm if it didn’t stop a subsidiary from competing for artist promotion contracts.

But competitor ticket sellers have long complained that Live Nation makes it difficult for them to disrupt the market with practices such as withholding acts if those venues don’t agree to use Ticketmaster’s service.

The lawsuit is the latest example of the Biden administration’s aggressive antitrust enforcement approach targeting companies accused of engaging in illegal monopolies that box out competitors and drive up prices.

In March, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Apple alleging that the tech giant has monopoly power in the smartphone market.

“Today’s action is a step forward in making this era of live music more accessible for the fans, the artists, and the industry that supports them,” Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said in a statement.


The original article contains 635 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PlanetOfOrd 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They also make filling up your gas tank an even more unbearable experience.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 1 points 6 months ago

I think it’s the second button on the right, you can nearly always mute any commercial at the pump.

[–] Jimmycakes 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They didn't donate enough this election year. This is a warning to all other corpos to pay up.

[–] ripcord 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Or, you know, a good thing happened.

God damn. You people can't be happy about anything ever, for any reason.

[–] Jimmycakes -2 points 6 months ago

What do you mean "you people" what are you trying to say