this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
227 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6965 readers
476 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

i recognize the ram from AoE2, idk what's the other thing

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh that’s a battering ram from Age of Empires II, I don’t know what AoE2 is.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago

AoE2 is the sequel to Age of Empires. Never heard of Age of Empires II though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

The finest tank armour money can buy

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago

Well, should've expected it, considering they already use russian orthodox priests to Whololo

[–] Delphia 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, its kind of effective as camoflage from aerial recon.

Does look like an old building if you arent looking too closely.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, an old building that got separated from its herd.

[–] HappycamperNZ 13 points 9 months ago

Poor building, hope its ok

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

/credible

What is the consensus on these things? They’re still vulnerable to tank mines, though definitely fares better against ATGMs and FPV - but is it still an effective tank with all those panels bolted on? Could this be the weapon to surpass metal gear!?

[–] Uncle_Sheo217 9 points 9 months ago

I can’t imagine the loss of visibility and potential movement of the turret is worth the protection of some thin, rusted sheets of metal, but I’m all for the Russian troops handicapping themselves further.

[–] Diplomjodler3 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would that thing actually help against a javelin?

[–] mojofrododojo 2 points 9 months ago

I think it would reduce effectiveness but not enough to make a significant difference, certainly not enough to justify the state of it.

[–] Diplomjodler3 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] uebquauntbez 4 points 9 months ago

Some r there already, golf cart style.

[–] supercriticalcheese 7 points 9 months ago

Cope tent ⛺

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Garrison some mobiks inside to make it go faster