this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
145 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mPony 151 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Holy Fucking Shit what a goddamn baby.

[–] Bdtrngl 51 points 7 months ago
[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 7 months ago
[–] themeatbridge 70 points 7 months ago

Yes, spend more of the RNC's money on fruitless legal maneuvers. Drain the accounts, and fail to fund downticket races across the country. Hopefully, progressives can capitalize on this and replace some of the shitbags that have been creeping into state and local offices where much of the actual governing takes place.

[–] blazera 39 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Its like when you're watching an action show, and the protagonist is in peril, the situation is dire, you cant imagine how he's gonna get out of this one but you know he will because that's how the show works.

So a judge is presiding over a case for a crime that we already know happened and how it played out, people are already in jail because trump ordered them to buy this girl's silence, this trial is basically just a formality. He's been harassing the judge, their family, and the court staff, and realistically putting their lives in peril trying to incite violence against them. Now he is also suing the person who gets to decide his verdict in the crime that's already been settled in court as having happened.

I already know he's going to avoid consequences, but god how?

[–] FenrirIII 5 points 7 months ago

The American legal system is not meant to deliver justice, it's a mechanism for the rich and powerful to break the law.

[–] Rapidcreek 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The TRUMP brand after shave is called "Desperation"

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fragrance Notes

Head: Treason, Ego, Narcissism

Heart: Cowardice, Failed Insurrection, Porn Star Juice

Base: Soiled Diapers, Fake Gold, Russian Hooker Piss

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Fortunately Trump couldn't kill any women and use them for their scent in a massive orgy.

[–] DeepThought42 20 points 7 months ago

Just another delay tactic. Here's hoping that the courts eventually get tired of all his BS and throw the book at him.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Donald Trump has sued the judge overseeing the Manhattan hush money case against him in another last-ditch effort to stop his first-ever criminal trial, less than one week before jury selection is scheduled to begin.

Mr Trump is expected to ask appeals court judges to block the gag order and move the case out of Manhattan, among the latest attempts to delay the proceedings after failing to stop the first among the four criminal trials he is expected to face in the coming months.

Last year, in the first criminal indictment against him, a grand jury charged the former president with 34 counts of falsifying business records in connection with repayments to his then-lawyer Michael Cohen, who arranged a hush money scheme to prevent the release of potentially compromising stories about Mr Trump and his affairs.

The case from the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg could rely on Cohen’s testimony that Mr Trump authorised his business to falsely file payments as legal expenses, part of an alleged effort to quash stories that could interfere with then-candidate Trump’s 2016 campaign, according to prosecutors.

That motion represented “yet another last-ditch attempt to address [the] defendant’s real objective … to delay this proceeding indefinitely.”

Mr Trump’s attorneys similarly sued a judge last year to block gag orders in a sweeping civil fraud case that prevented the former president from disparaging court staff.


The original article contains 351 words, the summary contains 231 words. Saved 34%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] LordCrom 4 points 7 months ago

Bet he would like to .ove the trial to deep south Mississippi or Alabama. He's Sure he could get a jury of racists down there to find him not guilty.