EGS, on the other hand, is still an abysmal failure beyond the lure of free (and increasingly shittier) games and a yearly 25% off discount coupon that people fall for.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I really wish they'd start by not making the EGS program a fucking UE5 app. Seriously, using the whole ass engine to render html is stupid beyond belief

[–] pivot_root 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait, is it seriously a full-blown UE5 application?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I was going to call shenanigans, but then I looked at the details of the application:

https://i.imgur.com/J30SGAr.png

So it seems there is something to it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If you peruse the folder where it's installed and compared to any UE4 or UE5 game, you'll notice all the other similarities in .dll files, folders and whatnot. Even the CrashReporter.exe is the same you see in unreal games. Or you can check the config files at Epic Games\Launcher\Engine\Config which has stuff like BaseEngine.ini which, among other networking configurations, also has this:

[/Script/Engine.Engine]
ConsoleClassName=/Script/Engine.Console
GameViewportClientClassName=/Script/Engine.GameViewportClient
LocalPlayerClassName=/Script/Engine.LocalPlayer
WorldSettingsClassName=/Script/Engine.WorldSettings
NavigationSystemClassName=/Script/NavigationSystem.NavigationSystemV1
NavigationSystemConfigClassName=/Script/NavigationSystem.NavigationSystemModuleConfig
AvoidanceManagerClassName=/Script/Engine.AvoidanceManager
PhysicsCollisionHandlerClassName=/Script/Engine.PhysicsCollisionHandler

Meanwhile, in Epic Games\Launcher\Portal\Config, the "game" part of the launcher, you have DefaultGame.ini and DefaultEngine.ini, the latter's first 2 lines pointing back to the Engine folder: [Configuration] BasedOn=..\Engine\Config\BaseEngine.ini

So, yeah, it's the actual engine. I was going to complain about disk bloat, but my Steam install is currently sitting at 1.3GB and I'm not entirely sure how much of that is from cached stuff. GOG Galaxy is taking ~980MB, but roughly 650MB are from redist installers (MSVC2005, 2007, dotnet, etc), so a "clean" install would be way lighter than Steam or EGS, the latter at 1.1GB on a clean install.

[–] pivot_root 2 points 8 months ago

That is ridiculous. Even Electron would have been better...

load more comments (8 replies)

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Rose 1 points 8 months ago

Steam is largely driven by Valve's own games and freebies as well. 1.5M currently playing Dota 2 and CS 2, with the next best being F2P games: PUBG with 370K online, Apex Legends, and Naraka.

[–] ABCDE 1 points 8 months ago

Rocket League and Fall Guys are also on there. Not sure how much paid games sell there though.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exclusive deals suck ass. So good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They are anti-consumer, but for smaller devs in particular, they can mean the difference between between canceling and releasing a game, between bankruptcy and the studio's continued existence.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (8 children)

If your success depends on a storefront paying you to sell your game to less people, maybe it is for the best that it doesn't succeed.

load more comments (8 replies)

[–] Donkter 51 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, game publishers are in their "cash out" phase after realizing there's no competing against steam.

[–] ampersandrew 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There is if they're interested in competing with Steam. Epic made some very competitive offerings for the supply side of things and then provided very little reason for customers to ever shop there, which it turns out is just as, if not more important.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let me gift games, let me wishlist games to receive gifts. There's lots of other features I would also like but if other stores had that I'd be much more inclined to use the other stores.

[–] ampersandrew 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

GOG does those things, for what that's worth.

[–] Veraxus 9 points 8 months ago

GOG is great. I do wish Epic would improve their platform, though. It’s like they’re not even trying.

[–] johannesvanderwhales 43 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I really wonder how the palworld devs feel about being gamepass day 1. I have no idea what the payouts look like for them. It probably got a lot more people to try their game, but would they have done better selling it only on steam? They probably weren't in a position to negotiate a very favorable contract with Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that's looking at the deal in hindsight. Palworld had just as good a chance at flopping completely as hitting #1 worldwide, I imagine they were grateful for the opportunity to have some guaranteed income at the time.

[–] _sideffect 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some? Didn't they make over 400m?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think they meant guaranteed income prior to selling the game, since they had no way of knowing how successful (if at all) the game was going to be once released.

[–] _sideffect 3 points 8 months ago

Ah, makes sense

[–] sinceasdf 22 points 8 months ago

Because craftopia and palworld have a social aspect getting a big seed of players who only played it because it was free (for them) was I think a catalyst in making palworld blow up like it did. There are too many games out there for people to look through so it probably helps get word out effectively to sell out cheap for a big initial audience like gamepass when you're a small dev. I only knew of craftopia or palworld because of gamepass at least

The flip side is Microsoft is 100% giving the above as a sales pitch to devs why they should put their game on gamepass for peanuts (paid in exposure!). That's probably some of what drives the shittier deal devs get now

[–] sonovebitch 9 points 8 months ago

Their previous game Craftopia was also on GamePass and somewhat successful. They probably had some leverage for negotiations.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Maybe... just not make exclusive deals? Especially not on mediocre game distribution platforms.

[–] MurrayL 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"I talked to at least five small teams, like 35 [members] and under, during GDC, and they're like: Cuts, cuts, cuts, funding canceled, talks that were going on for a year, canceled," said Casey Yano, the co-founder of Slay the Spire studio Mega Crit. "It sounds like it's shit. We're definitely very privileged to be able to self-fund. [Otherwise] I'd be very, very, very scared right now."

If these deals didn't exist, lots of games simply wouldn't get made. You can hate on the platforms all you like but the deals are one of the only sources of funding for small & solo developers.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Oh no! Not the games I will never play because they're exclusive to EGS!

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] rtxn 12 points 8 months ago

Remember DARQ? Taking a stance against third-party exclusivity pays off.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 25 points 8 months ago

Hawkish monetary policy has a way of making it hard to turn a profit on long horizon projects.

load more comments