sinceasdf

I see people on this website saying the local version is uncensored all the time lol

The article is a flat lie. It allows attackers to view fragments of an rdp session screen and nothing else like "take over" anything. It's also not remotely new.

There's a good reason why you see Nvidia or AMD splash logos on game startup. Companies 100% get kickbacks to make demanding games that use the newest hardware

I think the baked-in political biases highlight how not "open source" the weights really are without knowledge of the training data. You can bias these systems however you want to and it's nontrivial or impossible to remove it once it's there.

This is why Nvidia stock has been hit so hard. CUDA is their moat

So anyone with an older or non-nvidia card can just get fucked?

This sounds like an Nvidia monopolistic backroom deal or something. Bet you'll see an Nvidia splash on those games' startup.

I can't find any remotely authoritative sources saying this. Who is this YouTuber?

Repeal citizens United and institute ranked choice voting nationwide (USA)

Lol kinda funny how NIN is almost as big as all the whole genre options. Only other actual artists I see are Metallica and Michael Jackson and they're relatively small.

Would be interesting to see a govt tackle setting up a trustless system like it required for cybersecurity best practices. I think it's a thorny issue without a trusted authority though.

What stops an ID for being posted publicly or shared en masse? So one ID can be used unlimited times - just share the key with minors for $1 at no risk to oneself since there's no knowledge of the 'transaction' being sent around. Better for individual privacy but that undermines the political impetus for wanting the verification. Usage would probably have to be monitored or capped, kind of defeating the advantage of the anonymous protocol (or accept that abuse is unenforceable).

Interesting explanation. Democracy can't really work unless people have a trusted source of truth and those seem hard to come by these days with the struggles of for-profit news orgs (mostly owned by the same few giant media conglomerates). Would make sense that an effective angle of propaganda is to exacerbate that in any way possible.

For sure, I think the research is more relevant to other research professionals rather than us plebs on social media though. Posting it here is kinda puts it out of context I think